Skip to main content
Multistudy Report

A Theoretical Approach to Resolving the Psychometric Problems Associated With the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory

Results From the USA, Australia, Slovenia, and the United Kingdom

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000313

Abstract. The Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI; Zimbardo & Boyd, 1999) assesses five time-related constructs – Past Negative (PN), Past Positive (PP), Present Fatalistic (PF), Present Hedonistic (PF), and Future (F) – and is one of the most frequently used time measures in the extant literature. Versions of the ZTPI have been translated into a variety of languages, but the psychometric support for ZTPI scores remains contested. We examined the internal consistency, structural validity, and convergent validity of scores on a version of the ZTPI that consisted only of items that specifically referenced time constructs, the ZTPI-TP. Participants consisted of five samples of adolescents and adults from four countries: Australia (653 adults), Slovenia (425 adolescents and adults), the United Kingdom (913 adolescents; 455 adults), and the United States (815 adolescents). Structural validity analyses provided stronger support for ZTPI-TP scores than for ZTPI scores, and convergent validity evidence also provided support for ZTPI-TP scores. However, analyses revealed that the PF and PH factors were still problematic, especially with regard to factor coefficients and internal consistency estimates. We concluded that the ZTPI-TP can form the basis for a more robust version of the ZTPI.

References

  • Adewuya, A. O. (2005). Validation of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (Audit) as a screening tool for alcohol-related problems among Nigerian university students. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 40, 575–577. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agh197. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alansari, M., Worrell, F. C., Rubie-Davies, C. & Webber, M. (2013). Adolescent Time Attitude Scale (ATAS) scores and academic outcomes in secondary school females in New Zealand. International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, 1, 251–274. doi: 10.1504/IJQRE.2013.057687. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Apostolidis, T. & Fieulaine, N. (2004). Validation française de l’échelle de temporalité the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI).[French validation of the temporal scale the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI)] Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 54, 207–217. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438. doi: 10.1080/10705510903008204. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beauducel, A. & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 186–203. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. & Wu, E. J. C. (2002). EQS 6 for Windows: User’s guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bjelland, I., Dahl, A. A., Haug, T. T. & Neckelmann, D. (2002). The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: An updated literature review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 52, 69–77. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00296-3. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buss, A. H. & Perry, M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452–459. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carelli, M. G., Wiberg, B. & Wiberg, M. (2011). Development and validation of the Swedish Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 220–227. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000076. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Comrey, A. L. & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Crawford, J. R., Henry, J. D., Crombie, C. & Taylor, E. P. (2001). Normative data for the HADS from a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 429–434. doi: 10.1348/014466501163904. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Crockett, R. A., Weinman, J., Hankins, M. & Marteau, T. (2009). Time orientation and health-related behaviour: Measurement in general population samples. Psychology and Health, 24, 333–350. doi: 10.1080/08870440701813030. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • D’Alessio, M., Guarino, A., De Pascalis, V. & Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Testing Zimbardo’s Stanford Time Perspective Inventory (SPTI) – Short Form: An Italian study. Time and Society, 12, 333–347. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Meneses-Gaya, C., Zuardi, A.W., Loureiro, S.R. & Crippa, J.A.S. (2009). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): An updated systematic review of psychometric properties. Psychology and Neuroscience, 2, 83–97. doi: 10.3922/j.psns.2009.1.12. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Díaz-Morales, J. F. (2006). Estructura factorial y fiabilidad del Inventario de Perspectiva Temporal de Zimbardo.[Factorial Structure and Reliability of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory] Psicothema, 18, 565–571. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G. & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Geisinger, K. F. (2003). Testing and assessment in cross-cultural psychology. In V. J. R. GrahamJ. A. NaglieriI. B. WeinerEds., Handbook of psychology – Vol. 10: Assessment psychology (pp. 95–119). NJ: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gray-Little, B., Williams, V. S. L. & Hancock, T. D. (1997). An item response theory analysis of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 443–451. doi: 10.1177/0146167297235001. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gullone, E. & Robinson, K. (2005). The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment-Revised (IPPA-R) for children: A psychometric investigation. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 12, 67–79. doi: 10.1002/cpp.433. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heene, M., Hilbert, S., Draxler, C., Ziegler, M. & Bühner, M. (2011). Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: A cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices. Psychological Methods, 16, 319–336. doi: 10.1037/a0024917. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • International Test Commission (2005). International guidelines on test and adaptation, Retrieved from www.intestcom.org First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Joireman, J., Balliet, D., Sprott, D., Spangenberg, E. & Schultz, J. (2008). Consideration of future consequences, ego-depletion, and self-control: Support for distinguishing between CFC-immediate and CFC-future sub-scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.02.011. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D. & Strathman, A. (2012). Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: Evidence from the two-factor Consideration of Future Consequences-14 Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1272–1287. doi: 10.1177/0146167212449362. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Keough, K. A., Zimbardo, P. G. & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Who’s smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and Applied Psychology, 21, 149–164. doi: 10.1207/S15324834BA210207. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Khachatryan, H., Joireman, J. & Casavant, K. (2013). Relating values and consideration of future and immediate consequences to consumer preference for biofuels: A three-dimensional social dilemma analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 97–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.001. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laghi, F., Baiocco, R., Liga, F., Guarino, A. & Baumgartnet, E. (2013). Identity status differences among Italian adolescents: Associations with time perspective. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 482–487. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lasane, T. P. & O’Donnell, D. A. (2005). Time orientation measurement: A conceptual approach. In A. StrathmanJ. JoiremanEds., Understanding behavior in the context of time: Theory, research, & application (pp. 11–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11, 320–341. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, A., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S. & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 439–476. doi: 10.1080/10705510903008220. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., Rogers, W., Raczek, A. E. & Lu, J. F. R. (1992). The validity and relative precision of MOS short and long form Health Status Scales and Dartmouth COOP charts: Results from the medical outcomes study. Medical Care, 30, 253–265. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McKay, M. T., Andretta, J. R., Magee, J. & Worrell, F. C. (2014). What do temporal profiles tell us about adolescent alcohol use? Results from a large sample in the United Kingdom. Journal of Adolescence, 37, 1319–1328. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.09.008. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McKay, M. T., Worrell, F. C., Temple, E. C., Perry, J. & Cole, J. C. (2014). A critical examination of the reliability and validity of the SZTPI-15 in British, American and Australian samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 168–172. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.030. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McKay, M. T., Worrell, F. C., Temple, E. C., Perry, J., Cole, J. C. & Mello, Z. R. (2015). Less is not always more: The case of the 36-item short form of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 68–71. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.018. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C. & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternate fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568–592. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Milfont, T. L., Andrade, P. R., Belo, R. P. & Pessoa, V. S. (2008). Testing Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory in a Brazilian sample. Revista Interamericana de Psicologia, 42, 49–58. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, B. O. & Muthén, L. K. (1998–2012). Mplus User’s Guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Perry, J. L., Clough, P. J., Crust, L., Earle, K. & Nicholls, A. R. (2013). Factorial validity of the Mental Toughness Questionnaire-48. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 587–592. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.020. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reinert, D. F. & Allen, J. P. (2007). The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: An update of research findings. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 31, 185–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00295.x. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image, (Rev. ed.). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R. & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction, 88, 791–804. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seijts, G. H. (1998). The importance of future time perspective in theories of work motivation. Journal of Psychology, 132, 154–168. doi: 10.1080/00223989809599156. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R. & Schurer-Lambert, L. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.001. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sircova, A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Osin, E., Milfont, T. L., Fieulaine, N., Kislali-Erginbilic, A. & 54 members of the International Time Perspective Research Project (2014). A global look at time: A 24-country study of equivalence of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. SAGE Open, 4, 1–12. doi: 10.1177/2158244013515686. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Snaith, R. P. & Zigmond, A. S. (1994). HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Windsor, Canada: NFER Nelson. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stolarski M.Fieulaine N.van Beek W. (2015). Time perspective theory: Review, research, and application. Essays in honor of Phillip G. Zimbardo. Zug, Switzerland: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S. & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742–752. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 99–103. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thompson, B. (2003). Understanding reliability and coefficient alpha, really. In B. ThompsonEd., Score reliability: Contemporary thinking on reliability issues (pp. 3–23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ware, J. E.Jr., Manning, W. G.Jr., Duan, N., Wells, K. B. & Newhouse, J. P. (1984). Health status and the use of outpatient mental health services. American Psychologist, 39, 1090–1100. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1090. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weisner, M. & Schandling, G. T. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling, bifactor models, and standard confirmatory factor analysis models: Application to the BASC-2 Behavioral and Emotional Screening System Teacher Form. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 751–763. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.09.001. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Worrell, F. C. & Mello, Z. R. (2007). The reliability and validity of Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI) scores in academically talented adolescents. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 487–504. doi: 10.1177/0013164406296985. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Worrell, F. C., Mello, Z. R. & Buhl, M. (2013). Introducing English and German versions of the Adolescent Time Attitude Scale (ATAS). Assessment, 4, 496–510. doi: 10.1177/1073191110396202. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T. & Bowerman, T. (2013). Validating a brief measure of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Time and Society, 22, 391–409. doi: 10.1177/0961463X12441174. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zigmond, A. S. & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zimbardo, P. G. & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Time perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar