Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Multistudy Report

Personality Across the Lifespan

Exploring Measurement Invariance of a Short Big Five Inventory From Ages 11 to 84

Published Online:September 25, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000490

Abstract

Abstract. Personality is a relevant predictor for important life outcomes across the entire lifespan. Although previous studies have suggested the comparability of the measurement of the Big Five personality traits across adulthood, the generalizability to childhood is largely unknown. The present study investigated the structure of the Big Five personality traits assessed with the Big Five Inventory-SOEP Version (BFI-S; SOEP = Socio-Economic Panel) across a broad age range spanning 11–84 years. We used two samples of N = 1,090 children (52% female, Mage = 11.87) and N = 18,789 adults (53% female, Mage = 51.09), estimating a multigroup CFA analysis across four age groups (late childhood: 11–14 years; early adulthood: 17–30 years; middle adulthood: 31–60 years; late adulthood: 61–84 years). Our results indicated the comparability of the personality trait metric in terms of general factor structure, loading patterns, and the majority of intercepts across all age groups. Therefore, the findings suggest both a reliable assessment of the Big Five personality traits with the BFI-S even in late childhood and a vastly comparable metric across age groups.

References

  • Allik, J., Laidra, K., Realo, A. & Pullmann, H. (2004). Personality development from 12 to 18 years of age: Changes in mean levels and structure of traits. European Journal of Personality, 18, 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.524 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Anglim, J. & Grant, S. (2016). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: Incremental prediction from 30 facets over the Big 5. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9583-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Asendorpf, J. B. & van Aken, M. A. G. (2003). Validity of Big Five personality judgments in childhood: A 9 year longitudinal study. European Journal of Personality, 17, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.460 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Goldberg, L. R. & DeVries, R. E. (2009). Higher order factors of personality: Do they exist? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309338467 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baltes, P. B., Lindenberger, U. & Staudinger, U. M. (2006). Life span theory in developmental psychology. In W. DamonR. M. LernerEds., Handbook of Child psychology (pp. 569–664). New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Biesanz, J. C. & West, S. G. (2004). Towards understanding assessments of the Big Five: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of convergent and discriminant validity across measurement occasion and type of observer. Journal of Personality, 72, 845–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00282.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bleidorn, W. & Ostendorf, F. (2009). Ein Big Five-Inventar für Kinder und Jugendliche [A Big Five inventory for children and adolescents: The German version of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC)]. Diagnostica, 55, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.55.3.160 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Booth, T. & Hughes, D. J. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling of personality data. Assessment, 21, 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114528029 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Caliendo, M., Fossen, F. & Kritikos, A. S. (2014). Personality characteristics and the decisions to become and stay self-employed. Small Business Economist, 42, 787–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9514-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Caspi, A. & Shiner, R. L. (2006). Personality development. In W. DamonR. LernerN. EisenbergEds., Handbook of child psychology (pp. 300–364). New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W. & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chang, L., Connelly, B. S. & Geeza, A. A. (2012). Separating method factors and higher order traits of the Big Five: A meta-analytic multitrait-multimethod approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 408–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025559 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Church, A. T. & Burke, P. J. (1994). Exploratory and confirmatory tests of the Big Five and Tellegen’s three- and four-dimensional models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.93 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R and NEO-FFI professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1997). Longitudinal stability of adult personality. In R. HoganJ. A. JohnsonS. R. BriggsEds., Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 269–290). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50012-3 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeFruyt, F., Mervielde, I., Hoekstra, H. A. & Rolland, J.-P. (2000). Assessing adolescent’s personality with the NEO-PI-R. Assessment, 7, 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319110000700403 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DePauw, S. S. W., Mervielde, I. & Van Leeuwen, K. G. (2009). How are traits related to problem behavior in preschoolers? Similarities and contrasts between temperament and personality. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9290-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1138 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fuchs, G. & Brunner, M. (2014). Kompetenzentwicklung und Schulqualität an Brandenburger Grundschulen: Abschlussbericht der KEGS-Studie [Development of competencies in primary school: Final report of the KEGS study]. Berlin, Germany: ISQ. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gerlitz, Y. & Schupp, J. (2005). Assessment of Big Five personality characteristics in the SOEP (DIW Research Notes 4). Berlin, Germany: German Institute of Economic Research. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Guenole, N. & Brown, A. (2014). The consequences of ignoring measurement invariance for path coefficients in structural equation models. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 980. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00980 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hahn, E., Gottschling, J. & Spinath, F. M. (2012). Short measurements of personality – Validity and reliability of the GSOEP Big Five Inventory (BFI-S). Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 355–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.03.008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hildebrandt, A., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Sommer, C. & Wilhelm, O. (2016). Exploring factor model parameters across continuous variables with local structural equation models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 257–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2016.1142856 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hildebrandt, A., Wilhelm, O. & Robitzsch, A. (2009). Complementary and competing factor analytic approaches for the investigation of measurement invariance. Review of Psychology, 16, 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/t27207-000 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • John, O. P., Caspi, A., Robins, R. W., Moffitt, T. E. & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1994). The “little five”: Exploring the nomological network of the five-factor model of personality in adolescent boys. Child Development, 65, 160–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131373 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • John, O. P., Donahue, E. M. & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory–Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • John, O. P., Naumann, L. P. & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five Taxonomy. History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. JohnR. W. RobinsL. A. PervinEds., Handbook of personality (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • John, O. P. & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. PervinO. P. JohnEds., Handbook of personality (pp. 102–139). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, F. R. (2005). Erfassung des kognitiven Leistungspotenzials und der “Big Five” mit Computer-Assisted-Personal-Interviewing (CAPI): Zur Reliabilität und Validität zweier ultrakurzer Tests und des BFI-S [Assessment of cognitive capabilities and the Big Five with Computer-Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI): Reliability and validity]. (DIW Research Notes 9). Berlin, Germany: German Institute of Economic Research. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, F. R., John, D., Lüdtke, O., Schupp, J. & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Short assessment of the Big Five: Robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 548–567. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0066-z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY/London, UK: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lucas, R. E. & Donnellan, M. B. (2011). Personality development across the life span: Longitudinal analyses with a national sample from Germany. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 847–861. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024298 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lüdtke, O., Roberts, B. W., Trautwein, U. & Nagy, G. (2011). A random walk down university avenue: Life paths, life events, and personality trait change at the transition to university life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 620–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023743 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1986). Negative item bias in rating scales for preadolescent children: A cognitive-developmental phenomena. Developmental Psychology, 22, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.1.37 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U. & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019227 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B. & Morin, A. J. S. (2013). Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1194–1218. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026913 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. JohnR. W. RobinsL. A. PervinEds., Handbook of personality (pp. 159–181). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr., Terracciano, A., Parker, W. D., Mills, C. J., DeFruyt, F. & Mervielde, I. (2002). Personality trait development from age 12 to age 18: Longitudinal, cross-sectional and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1456–1468. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1456 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Measelle, J. R., John, O. P., Ablow, J. C., Cowan, P. A. & Cowan, C. P. (2005). Can children provide coherent, stable, and valid self-reports on the Big Five dimensions? A longitudinal study from ages 5 to 7. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.90 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Milfont, T. L. & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Apllications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 111–121. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.857 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Putnick, D. L. & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rammstedt, B. & Farmer, R. F. (2013). The impact of acquiescence on the evaluation of personality structure. Psychological Assessment, 25, 1137–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033323 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roberts, B. W. & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E. & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A. & Evans, D. E. (2000). Temperament and personality: Origins and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.1.122 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74. https://www.dgps.de/fachgruppen/methoden/mpr-online/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sirois, F. M. & Hirsch, J. K. (2015). Big Five traits, affect balance and health behaviors: A self-regulation resource perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.031 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP). (2016). Data for years 1984–2014 version 31. SOEP. https://doi.org/10.5684/soep.v31.1 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D. & Potter, J. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of Big Five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 718–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.718 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Specht, J., Egloff, B. & Schmukle, S. C. (2011). Stability and change of personality across the life course: The impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 862–882. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024950 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross‐national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78–107. https://doi.org/10.1086/209528 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • van der Linden, D., te Nijenhuis, J. & Bakker, A. B. (2010). The general factor of personality: A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.03.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vassend, O. & Skrondal, A. (1997). Validation of the NEO Personality Inventory and the five-factor model. Can findings from exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis be reconciled? European Journal of Personality, 11, 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199706)11:2<147::AID-PER278>3.0.CO;2-E First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R. & Schupp, J. (2007). The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP)–Scope, evolution and enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 127, 139–169. https://www.diw.de/sixcms/detail.php?id=diw_02.c.233221.de First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Widaman, K. F. & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. BryantM. WindleS. G. WestEds., The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zentner, M. & Bates, J. E. (2008). Child temperament: An integrative review of concepts, research programs, and measures. European Journal of Developmental Science, 2, 7–37. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ziegler, M., Poropat, A. & Mell, J. (2014). Does the length of a questionnaire matter? Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000147 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar