Skip to main content
Multistudy Report

A Psychometric Evaluation of the Short Grit Scale

A Closer Look at its Factor Structure and Scale Functioning

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000535

Abstract. Grit, the passion and perseverance for long-term goals, has received attention from personality psychologists because it predicts success and academic achievement. Grit has also been criticized as simply another measure of self-control or conscientiousness. A precise psychometric representation of grit is needed to understand how the construct is unique and how it overlaps with other constructs. Previous research suggests that the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S) has several psychometric limitations, such as uncertain factor structure within and across populations, uncertainty about reporting total or subscale scores, and different assessment precision at low and high levels on the construct. We conducted modern psychometric techniques including parallel analysis, measurement invariance, extrinsic convergent validity, and Item Response Theory models on two American samples. Our results suggest that the Grit-S is essentially unidimensional and that there is construct overlap with the self-control construct. Subscale factors were the result of an item doublet, where two items had highly correlated uniquenesses, showed similar item information, and were more likely to exhibit measurement bias. Findings replicated across samples. Finally, we discuss recommendations for the use of the Grit-S based on the theoretical interpretation of the unidimensional factor and our empirical findings.

References

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carey, K. B., Neal, D. J., & Collins, S. E. (2004). A psychometric analysis of the Self-Regulation Questionnaire. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chalmers, R. P. (2012). mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i06 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2014). Comparative measures of grit, tenacity and perseverance. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 8, 16–30. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Credé, M., Tynan, M. C., & Harms, P. D. (2017). Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 492–511. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000102 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duckworth, A. L., Grant, H., Loew, B., Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2011). Self‐regulation strategies improve self‐discipline in adolescents: Benefits of mental contrasting and implementation intentions. Educational Psychology, 31, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2010.506003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duckworth, A. L., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Self-control and grit: Related but separable determinants of success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414541462 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duckworth, A. L., Kirby, T. A., Tsukayama, E., Berstein, H., & Ericsson, K. A. (2011). Deliberate practice spells success: Why grittier competitors triumph at the National Spelling Bee. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610385872 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634290 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Edwards, M. C., Houts, C. R., & Cai, L. (2018). A diagnostic procedure to detect departures from local independence in item response theory models. Psychological Methods, 23, 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000121 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eisenberg, I. W., Bissett, P. G., Canning, J. R., Dallery, J., Enkavi, A. Z., Gabrieli, S. W., … Poldrack, R. A. (2018). Applying novel technologies and methods to inform the ontology of self-regulation. Behavior Research and Therapy, 101, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2017.09.014 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eskreis-Winkler, L., Duckworth, A. L., Shulman, E. P., & Beal, S. (2014). The grit effect: Predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school and marriage. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00036 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eskreis-Winkler, L., Shulman, E. P., Young, V., Tsukayama, E., Brunwasser, S. M., & Duckworth, A. L. (2016). Using wise interventions to motivate deliberate practice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 728–744. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fiske, D. W. (1971). Measuring the concepts of personality. Chicago, IL: Aldine. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haktanir, A., Lenz, A. S., Can, N., & Watson, J. C. (2016). Development and evaluation of Turkish language versions of three positive psychology assessments. International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling, 38, 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-016-9272-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lai, K., & Green, S. B. (2016). The problem with having two watches: Assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1134306 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Li, J., Zhao, Y., Kong, F., Du, S., Yang, S., & Wang, S. (2016). Psychometric assessment of the Short Grit Scale among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36, 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916674858 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lubinski, D. (2004). Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 years after Spearman’s (1904) “‘General intelligence’, objectively determined and measured”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.96 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCornack, R. L. (1956). A criticism of studies comparing item-weighting methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 40, 343–344. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Millsap, R. E., & Olivera-Aguilar, M. (2012). Investigating measurement invariance using confirmatory factor analysis. In R. HoyleEd., Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 380–392). New York, NY: Gilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muenks, K., Wigfield, A., Yang, J. S., & O’Neal, C. R. (2017). How true is grit? Assessing its relations to high school and college students’ personality characteristics, self-regulation, engagement, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000153 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • O’Neal, C. R., Espino, M. M., Goldthrite, A., Morin, M. F., Weston, L., Hernandez, P., & Fuhrmann, A. (2016). Grit under duress: Stress, strengths, and academic success among non-citizen and citizen Latina/o first-generation college students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 38, 446–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986316660775 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Revelle, W. (2017). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research (Version 1.7.5.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21, 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rojas, J. P., Reser, J. A., Usher, E. L., & Toland, M. D. (2012). Psychometric properties of the academic grit scale. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, F. T., Fleckenstein, J., Retelsdorf, J., Eskreis-Winkler, L., & Möller, J. (2017). Measuring grit: A German validation and domain-specific approach to Grit. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000407 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Shechtman, N., DeBarger, A. H., Dornsife, C., Rosier, S., & Yarnall, L. (2013). Promoting grit, tenacity, and perseverance: Critical factors for success in the 21st century. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Department of Educational Technology. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Strayhorn, T. L. (2014). What role does grit play in the academic success of black male collegians at predominantly white institutions? Journal of African American Studies, 18, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-012-9243-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self‐control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thissen, D.Wainer, H. (Eds.). (2001). Test scoring. New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tyumeneva, Y., Kardanova, E., & Kuzmina, J. (2017). Grit: Two related but independent constructs instead of one. Evidence from Item Response Theory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015–5759/a000424 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Weston, L. C. (2014). A replication and extension of psychometric research on the grit scale (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Maryland, College Park, MD. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, E. J. (1959). The comparison of regression variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 21, 396–399. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar