Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Short Form of the Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC-L9) in the US, Germany, and Russia

Psychometric Properties and Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance Test

Published Online:December 02, 2019https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000561

Abstract

Abstract. Validation of a 9-item version of the Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC-L9) and testing its cross-national measurement invariance and latent mean differences in representative samples from the United States of America (US), Germany, and Russia. The psychometric properties of the SOC-L9 were tested with representative samples aged 18–100 years from the US (N = 2,972), Germany (N = 2,005), and Russia (N = 2,726). Both a model with a general factor and method effect of items with negative wording and a unidimensional model were tested for structure validity. Measurement equivalence and latent mean comparisons were conducted across the samples. The SOC-L9 showed good reliability and validity in all countries. Rather than the unidimensional model, the model with additional method effect showed excellent fit across countries. Cross-national measurement invariance testing found partial strong measurement invariance across the three samples. The latent means of the SOC-L9 in the US sample were higher than those in German and Russian samples. The SOC-L9 has proved to be economic, valid, reliable, and cross-nationally applicable in the US, Germany, and Russia. Meaningful differences across countries were found, suggesting the importance of taking cultural background into account in SOC-related research.

References

  • Amirkhan, J. H., & Greaves, H. (2003). Sense of coherence and stress: The mechanics of a healthy disposition. Psychology and Health, 18, 31–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/0887044021000044233 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Antonovsky, A. (1987). Health promoting factors at work: The sense of coherence. In R. KalimoM. A. El-BatawiC. L. CooperEds., Psychosocial factors at work and their relation to health (pp. 153–167). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Antonovsky, A. (1993). The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social Science & Medicine, 36, 725–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(93)90033-Z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bieda, A., Hirschfeld, G., Schönfeld, P., Brailovskaia, J., Zhang, X. C., & Margraf, J. (2017). Universal happiness? Cross-cultural measurement invariance of scales assessing positive mental health. Psychological Assessment, 29, 408. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000353 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M., & Van de Vijver, F. J. (2010). Testing for measurement and structural equivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of nonequivalence. International Journal of Testing, 10, 107–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305051003637306 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chu, J. J., Khan, M. H., Jahn, H. J., & Kraemer, A. (2016). Sense of coherence and associated factors among university students in China: Cross-sectional evidence. BMC Public Health, 16, 336. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Daoud, N., Braun-Lewensohn, O., Eriksson, M., & Sagy, S. (2014). Sense of coherence and depressive symptoms among low-income Bedouin women in the Negev Israel. Journal of Mental Health, 23, 307–311. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2014.951475 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Drageset, J., & Haugan, G. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Orientation to Life Questionnaire in nursing home residents. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 30, 623–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12271 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eriksson, M., & Lindström, B. (2005). Validity of Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence scale: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 59, 460–466. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.018085 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eriksson, M., & Lindström, B. (2006). Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence scale and the relation with health: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 60, 376–381. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.018085 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eriksson, M., & Mittelmark, M. B. (2017). The sense of coherence and its measurement. In M. B. MittelmarkS. SagyM. ErikssonG. F. BauerJ. M. PelikanB. LindströmG. A. EspnesEds., The handbook of salutogenesis (pp. 97–106). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04600-6_12 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Frenz, A. W., Carey, M. P., & Jorgensen, R. S. (1993). Psychometric evaluation of Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 145. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.145 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Germano, D., Misajon, R., & Cummins, R. A. (2001). Quality of life and sense of coherence in people with arthritis. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 8, 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011964729100 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Girlando, A. P., & Eduljee, N. B. (2010). An empirical investigation of the malleability of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions: The case of the United States and Russia. Journal of Transnational Management, 15, 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475778.2010.514201 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gurina, N. A., Frolova, E. V., & Degryse, J. M. (2011). A roadmap of aging in Russia: The prevalence of frailty in community‐dwelling older adults in the St. Petersburg district – The “crystal” study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 59, 980–988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03448.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hart, K. E., Hittner, J. B., & Paras, K. C. (1991). Sense of coherence, trait anxiety, and the perceived availability of social support. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(91)90010-N First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Henry, J. D., & Crawford, J. R. (2005). The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466505X29657 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kliem, S., Mößle, T., Rehbein, F., Hellmann, D. F., Zenger, M., & Brähler, E. (2015). A brief form of the Perceived Social Support Questionnaire (F-SozU) was developed, validated, and standardized. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68, 551–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Konttinen, H., Haukkala, A., & Uutela, A. (2008). Comparing sense of coherence, depressive symptoms and anxiety, and their relationships with health in a population-based study. Social Science & Medicine, 66(12), 2401–2412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.053 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Larsson, G., & Kallenberg, K. (1999). Dimensional analysis of sense of coherence using structural equation modelling. European Journal of Personality, 13, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199901/02)13:1<51::AID-PER321>3.0.CO;2-P First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lee, J. W., Jones, P. S., Mineyama, Y., & Zhang, X. E. (2002). Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale. Research in Nursing & Health, 25, 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.10041 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lin, M., Hirschfeld, G., & Margraf, J. (2019). Brief Form of the Perceived Social Support Questionnaire (F-SozU K-6): Validation, Norms, and Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance in the USA, Germany, Russia, and China. Psychological Assessment, 31, 609–621. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000686 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lukat, J., Margraf, J., Lutz, R., van der Veld, W. M., & Becker, E. S. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Positive Mental Health Scale (PMH-scale). BMC Psychology, 4, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0111-x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of psychological research, 3(1), 111–130. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rauch, W. A., Schweizer, K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2007). Method effects due to social desirability as a parsimonious explanation of the deviation from unidimensionality in LOT-R scores. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1597–1607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.035 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roth, G., & Ekblad, S. (2006). A longitudinal perspective on depression and sense of coherence in a sample of mass-evacuated adults from Kosovo. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 194, 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nmd.0000217882.70120.38 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sardu, C., Mereu, A., Sotgiu, A., Andrissi, L., Jacobson, M. K., & Contu, P. (2012). Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale: Cultural validation of soc questionnaire and socio-demographic patterns in an Italian population. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 8, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901208010001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmitt, N., & Stuits, D. M. (1985). Factors defined by negatively keyed items: The result of careless respondents? Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(4), 367–373. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Scholten, S., Velten, J., Bieda, A., Zhang, X. C., & Margraf, J. (2017). Testing measurement invariance of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS-21) across four countries. Psychological Assessment, 29, 1376–1390. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000440 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schumacher, J., Wilz, G., Gunzelmann, T., & Brähler, E. (2000). The Antonovsky Sense of Coherence Scale. Test statistical evaluation of a representative population sample and construction of a brief scale. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 50(12), 472–482. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2000-9207 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments in satisfaction-research. Social Indicators Research, 37, 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300268 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wolff, A. C., & Ratner, P. A. (1999). Stress, social support, and sense of coherence. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 21, 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459922043820 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Woods, C. M. (2006). Careless responding to reverse-worded items: Implications for confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 28(3), 186. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar