Skip to main content
Multistudy Report

Aware of the Future?

Development and Validation of the Futures Consciousness Scale

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000565

Abstract. Futures Consciousness refers to the capacity that a person has for understanding, anticipating, and preparing for the future. Although the concept is widely used in the field of futures research, no quantitative tool exists yet that assesses it. Drawing from a recent five-dimensional model that considers Time perspective, Agency beliefs, Openness to alternatives, Systems perception, and Concern for others as interrelated sub-dimensions of a general construct of Futures Consciousness, we developed a composite 20-item scale that measures Futures Consciousness as an interindividual difference. The psychometric properties of this new scale were examined through a dual approach of exploratory and confirmatory factorial analyses with a total of 1,301 participants in three languages (English, French, and Finnish). The scale’s structure proved satisfactory and fitted the hypothesized five-dimensional model in all three languages. Measures of internal and external validity (convergent and concurrent) also indicated good psychometric properties. Notably, individuals’ scores were positively related to the adoption of several social future-oriented behaviors such as pro-environmental and civic behavior. As such, the developed scale proves a reliable tool that could be of use for scholars and practitioners in futures studies as well as psychology.

References

  • Ahvenharju, S., Lalot, F., Minkkinen, M., & Quiamzade, A. (2019). Psychological perspective to the five dimensions of Futures Consciousness. Manuscript in preparation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ahvenharju, S., Minkkinen, M., & Lalot, F. (2018). The five dimensions of Futures Consciousness. Futures, 104, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.010 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Altgassen, M., Rendell, P. G., Bernhard, A., Henry, J. D., Bailey, P. E., Phillips, L. H., & Kliegel, M. (2015). Future thinking improves prospective memory performance and plan enactment in older adults. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.956127 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baer, R. A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg015 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beal, S. J. (2011). The development of future orientation: Underpinnings and related constructs (PhD thesis). University of Nebraska-Lincoln. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bell, W. (1997). Foundations of Futures Studies: Human science for a new era. Vol. 1, History, purposes and knowledge. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bromberg, U., Wiehler, A., & Peters, J. (2015). Episodic future thinking is related to impulsive decision making in healthy adolescents. Child Development, 86, 1458–1468. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12390 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bruderer Enzler, H. (2015). Consideration of Future Consequences as a predictor of environmentally responsible behavior: Evidence from a general population study. Environment and Behavior, 47, 618–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513512204 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carleton, R. N., Norton, M. A. P. J., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2007). Fearing the unknown: A short version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.03.014 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, P. (2009). Future orientation, impulsivity, and deviance: Longitudinal relationships and multilevel processes (Doctoral dissertation, Auburn University). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304849250/abstract/84CDEA6808714C7BPQ/3 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Conner, M., & Norman, P. (2015). Predicting and changing health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models (3rd ed.). London, UK: Open University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cornwell, J. F. M., & Higgins, E. T. (2015). Approach and avoidance in moral psychology: Evidence for three distinct motivational levels. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.012 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. J., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Crockett, R. A., Weinman, J., Hankins, M., & Marteau, T. (2009). Time orientation and health-related behaviour: Measurement in general population samples. Psychology & Health, 24, 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440701813030 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davis, A. C., & Stroink, M. L. (2016). The relationship between systems thinking and the New Ecological Paradigm. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 33, 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2371 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dawidowicz, P. (2011). The person on the street’s understanding of systems thinking. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29, 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.1094 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3, 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Vries, R. E. (2013). The 24-item Brief HEXACO Inventory (BHI). Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 871–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL. London, UK: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dorham, C. (2005). Future orientation as a protective factor in the relationship between deviant peer association and adolescent adjustment (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/305453286/abstract/84CDEA6808714C7BPQ/6 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Facione, N. C., Facione, P. A., & Sanchez, C. A. (1994). Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: The development of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Journal of Nursing Education, 33, 345–350. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19941001-05 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Freire, P. (2013). Education for critical consciousness (Reprint ed.). London, UK/New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Furnham, A., & Steele, H. (1993). Measuring locus of control: A critique of general, children’s, health- and work-related locus of control questionnaires. British Journal of Psychology, 84, 443–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1993.tb02495.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106, 766–794. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.766 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hirschfeld, G., & von Brachel, R. (2014). Multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis in R – A tutorial in measurement invariance with continuous and ordinal indicators. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 19, 1–12. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=19&n=7 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. PervinO. P. JohnEds., Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jungk, R., & Mullert, N. (1987). Future workshops: How to create desirable futures. London, UK: Institute for Social Inventions. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1531–1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kenny, D. A. (2015). Measuring model fit. Retrieved from https://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kruglanski, A. W., & Fishman, S. (2009). The need for cognitive closure. In M. R. LearyR. H. HoyleEds., Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 343–353). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leith, K. P., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Empathy, shame, guilt, and narratives of interpersonal conflicts: Guilt-prone people are better at perspective taking. Journal of Personality, 66, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lezak, S. B., & Thibodeau, P. H. (2016). Systems thinking and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lindeman, M., & Verkasalo, M. (2005). Measuring values with the Short Schwartz’s Value Survey. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8502_09 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854–864. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.854 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Malaska, P. (2001). A futures research outline of a post-modern idea of progress. Futures, 33, 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(00)00069-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Margolis, H., & Mccabe, P. P. (2006). Improving self-efficacy and motivation: What to do, what to say. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512060410040401 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Matta, A. D., Gonçalves, F. L., & Bizarro, L. (2012). Delay discounting: Concepts and measures. Psychology & Neuroscience, 5, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.3922/j.psns.2012.2.03 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McFarland, S., & Brown, D. (2008). Who believes that identification with all humanity is ethical? Psicología Política, 36, 37–49. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McFarland, S., Webb, M., & Brown, D. (2012). All humanity is my ingroup: A measure and studies of identification with all humanity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 830–853. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028724 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McKay, M. T., Ballantyne, N., Goudie, A. J., Sumnall, H. R., & Cole, J. C. (2012). “Here for a good time, not a long time”: Decision-making, future consequences and alcohol use among Northern Irish adolescents. Journal of Substance Use, 17, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3109/14659891.2011.559566 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 111–121. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, R. (2015). Learning, the future, and complexity. An essay on the emergence of futures literacy. European Journal of Education, 50, 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12157 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mischel, W., Ebbesen, E. B., & Raskoff Zeiss, A. (1972). Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032198 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morris, M. (2002). Ecological consciousness and curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34, 571–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270110108187 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morselli, D., & Passini, S. (2015). Measuring prosocial attitudes for future generations: The social generativity scale. Journal of Adult Development, 22, 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-015-9210-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Noar, S. M. (2003). The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 622–647. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1004_8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<119::AID-JCLP2270380118>3.0.CO;2-I First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reysen, S., & Katzarska-Miller, I. (2013). A model of global citizenship: Antecedents and outcomes. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 858–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.701749 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rifkin, J. (2009). The empathic civilization: The race to global consciousness in a world in crisis (1st ed.). New York, NY: Tarcher Perigee. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rigdon, E. (1996). CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0701_07 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26, 521–562. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ruscio, J., & Roche, B. (2012). Determining the number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis using comparison data of known factorial structure. Psychological Assessment, 24, 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025697 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rushton, J. P., Chrisjohn, R. D., & Fekken, G. C. (1981). The altruistic personality and the Self-Report Altruism Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(81)90084-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sapp, S. G., & Harrod, W. J. (1993). Reliability and validity of a brief version of Levenson’s Locus of Control Scale. Psychological Reports, 72, 539–550. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1993.72.2.539 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.4.3.219 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., … Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029393 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sosu, E. M. (2013). The development and psychometric validation of a Critical Thinking Disposition Scale. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.09.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • St. John, D., & MacDonald, D. A. (2007). Development and initial validation of a measure of ecopsychological self. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 39, 48–67. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742–752. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Beek, J., Antonides, G., & Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2013). Eat now, exercise later: The relation between consideration of immediate and future consequences and healthy behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 785–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.12.015 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Prooijen, J.-W., & van der Kloot, W. A. (2001). Confirmatory analysis of exploratively obtained factor structures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 777–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640121971518 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, G., & Hackett, R. D. (2016). Conceptualization and measurement of virtuous leadership: Doing well by doing good. Journal of Business Ethics, 137, 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2560-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zacher, H., & de Lange, A. H. (2011). Relations between chronic regulatory focus and future time perspective: Results of a cross-lagged structural equation model. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1255–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.020 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zaff, J., Boyd, M., Li, Y., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2010). Active and engaged citizenship: Multi-group and longitudinal factorial analysis of an integrated construct of civic engagement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 736–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9541-6 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar