Abstract
Abstract. Futures Consciousness refers to the capacity that a person has for understanding, anticipating, and preparing for the future. Although the concept is widely used in the field of futures research, no quantitative tool exists yet that assesses it. Drawing from a recent five-dimensional model that considers Time perspective, Agency beliefs, Openness to alternatives, Systems perception, and Concern for others as interrelated sub-dimensions of a general construct of Futures Consciousness, we developed a composite 20-item scale that measures Futures Consciousness as an interindividual difference. The psychometric properties of this new scale were examined through a dual approach of exploratory and confirmatory factorial analyses with a total of 1,301 participants in three languages (English, French, and Finnish). The scale’s structure proved satisfactory and fitted the hypothesized five-dimensional model in all three languages. Measures of internal and external validity (convergent and concurrent) also indicated good psychometric properties. Notably, individuals’ scores were positively related to the adoption of several social future-oriented behaviors such as pro-environmental and civic behavior. As such, the developed scale proves a reliable tool that could be of use for scholars and practitioners in futures studies as well as psychology.
References
2019). Psychological perspective to the five dimensions of Futures Consciousness. Manuscript in preparation.
(2018). The five dimensions of Futures Consciousness. Futures, 104, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.010
(2015). Future thinking improves prospective memory performance and plan enactment in older adults. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.956127
(2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg015
(1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
(2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
(2011). The development of future orientation: Underpinnings and related constructs (PhD thesis). University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
(1997). Foundations of Futures Studies: Human science for a new era. Vol. 1, History, purposes and knowledge. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
(1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
(1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
(2015). Episodic future thinking is related to impulsive decision making in healthy adolescents. Child Development, 86, 1458–1468. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12390
(2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
(2015). Consideration of Future Consequences as a predictor of environmentally responsible behavior: Evidence from a general population study. Environment and Behavior, 47, 618–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513512204
(1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456
(1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
(2007). Fearing the unknown: A short version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.03.014
(2001). Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004
(2009). Future orientation, impulsivity, and deviance: Longitudinal relationships and multilevel processes (Doctoral dissertation, Auburn University). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304849250/abstract/84CDEA6808714C7BPQ/3
(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
(2015). Predicting and changing health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models (3rd ed.). London, UK: Open University Press.
(2015). Approach and avoidance in moral psychology: Evidence for three distinct motivational levels. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.012
(1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
(2009). Time orientation and health-related behaviour: Measurement in general population samples. Psychology & Health, 24, 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440701813030
(2016). The relationship between systems thinking and the New Ecological Paradigm. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 33, 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2371
(2011). The person on the street’s understanding of systems thinking. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29, 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.1094
(2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3, 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187
(2013). The 24-item Brief HEXACO Inventory (BHI). Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 871–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.003
(2000). Introducing LISREL. London, UK: Sage.
(2005). Future orientation as a protective factor in the relationship between deviant peer association and adolescent adjustment (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/305453286/abstract/84CDEA6808714C7BPQ/6
(1994). Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: The development of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Journal of Nursing Education, 33, 345–350. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19941001-05
(2013). Education for critical consciousness (Reprint ed.). London, UK/New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
(2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001
(1993). Measuring locus of control: A critique of general, children’s, health- and work-related locus of control questionnaires. British Journal of Psychology, 84, 443–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1993.tb02495.x
(1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106, 766–794. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.766
(1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
(2014). Multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis in R – A tutorial in measurement invariance with continuous and ordinal indicators. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 19, 1–12. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=19&n=7
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
(1999).
(The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives . In L. A. PervinO. P. JohnEds., Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.1987). Future workshops: How to create desirable futures. London, UK: Institute for Social Inventions.
(2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1531–1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.003
(2015). Measuring model fit. Retrieved from https://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm
(1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
(2009).
(The need for cognitive closure . In M. R. LearyR. H. HoyleEds., Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 343–353). New York, NY: Guilford Press.2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8
(1998). Empathy, shame, guilt, and narratives of interpersonal conflicts: Guilt-prone people are better at perspective taking. Journal of Personality, 66, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00001
(2016). Systems thinking and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.005
(2005). Measuring values with the Short Schwartz’s Value Survey. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8502_09
(2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854–864. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.854
(1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
(2001). A futures research outline of a post-modern idea of progress. Futures, 33, 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(00)00069-0
(2006). Improving self-efficacy and motivation: What to do, what to say. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512060410040401
(1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
(2012). Delay discounting: Concepts and measures. Psychology & Neuroscience, 5, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.3922/j.psns.2012.2.03
(2008). Who believes that identification with all humanity is ethical? Psicología Política, 36, 37–49.
(2012). All humanity is my ingroup: A measure and studies of identification with all humanity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 830–853. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028724
(2012). “Here for a good time, not a long time”: Decision-making, future consequences and alcohol use among Northern Irish adolescents. Journal of Substance Use, 17, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3109/14659891.2011.559566
(2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 111–121.
(2015). Learning, the future, and complexity. An essay on the emergence of futures literacy. European Journal of Education, 50, 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12157
(1972). Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032198
(2002). Ecological consciousness and curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34, 571–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270110108187
(2015). Measuring prosocial attitudes for future generations: The social generativity scale. Journal of Adult Development, 22, 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-015-9210-9
(2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
(2003). The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 622–647. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1004_8
(1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<119::AID-JCLP2270380118>3.0.CO;2-I
(2013). A model of global citizenship: Antecedents and outcomes. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 858–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.701749
(2009). The empathic civilization: The race to global consciousness in a world in crisis (1st ed.). New York, NY: Tarcher Perigee.
(1996). CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0701_07
(2011). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004
(1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
(2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26, 521–562. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1
(2012). Determining the number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis using comparison data of known factorial structure. Psychological Assessment, 24, 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025697
(1981). The altruistic personality and the Self-Report Altruism Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(81)90084-2
(1993). Reliability and validity of a brief version of Levenson’s Locus of Control Scale. Psychological Reports, 72, 539–550. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1993.72.2.539
(1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.4.3.219
(1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063
(1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x
(2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029393
(2000). Positive psychology. An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
(2013). The development and psychometric validation of a Critical Thinking Disposition Scale. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.09.002
(2007). Development and initial validation of a measure of ecopsychological self. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 39, 48–67.
(1980). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
(1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742–752. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742
(2013). Eat now, exercise later: The relation between consideration of immediate and future consequences and healthy behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 785–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.12.015
(2001). Confirmatory analysis of exploratively obtained factor structures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 777–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640121971518
(2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
(2016). Conceptualization and measurement of virtuous leadership: Doing well by doing good. Journal of Business Ethics, 137, 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2560-1
(2011). Relations between chronic regulatory focus and future time perspective: Results of a cross-lagged structural equation model. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1255–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.020
(2010). Active and engaged citizenship: Multi-group and longitudinal factorial analysis of an integrated construct of civic engagement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 736–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9541-6
(1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
(