Skip to main content
Multistudy Report

Validation of the Short Dark Triad in a German Sample

Structure, Nomological Network, and an Ultrashort Version

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000617

Abstract. The structure, correlates, and assessment of the Dark Triad are widely discussed in several fields of psychology. Based on the German version of the Short Dark Triad (SDT), we add to this by (a) providing a competitive test of existing structural models, (b) testing the nomological network, and (c) proposing an ultrashort 9-item version of the SDT (uSDT). A sample of N = 969 participants provided data on the SDT and a range of further measures. Our competitive test of five structural models revealed that fit indices and nomological network assumptions were best met in a three-factor model, with separate factors for psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism. The results provided an extensive overview of the raw, unique, and shared associations of Dark Triad dimensions with narcissism facets, sadism, impulsivity, self-esteem, sensation seeking, the Big Five, maladaptive personality traits, sociosexual orientation, and behavioral criteria. Finally, the uSDT exhibited satisfactory psychometric properties. The highest overlap in expected relations between SDT and uSDT, and convergent and discriminant measures was also found for the three-factor model. Our study underlines the utility of a three-factor model of the Dark Triad, extends findings on its nomological network, and provides an ultrashort instrument.

References

  • Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 30–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.30 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ackerman, R. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Wright, A. G. (2019). Current conceptualizations of narcissism. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 32(1), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000463 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • AERA, APA, NCME. (2014). Standards for Educational & Psychological Testing, American Educational Research Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beauducel, A., & Wittmann, W. W. (2005). Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(1), 41–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1201_3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, W. K., & Campbell, S. M. (2009). On the self-regulatory dynamics created by the peculiar benefits and costs of narcissism: A contextual reinforcement model and examination of leadership. Self and Identity, 8(2–3), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860802505129 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: Towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.171 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Credé, M., Harms, P., Niehorster, S., & Gaye-Valentine, A. (2012). An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 874–888. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027403 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Crowe, M. L., Lynam, D. R., Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. D. (2019). Exploring the structure of narcissism: Towards an integrated solution. Journal of Personality, 87, 1151–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12464 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Danner, D., Rammstedt, B., Bluemke, M., Treiber, L., Berres, S., Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2016). Die deutsche Version des Big Five Inventory 2 (BFI-2) [The German version of the Big Five Inventory 2]. Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen, https://doi.org/10.6012/zis247 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Edwards, P., Roberts, I., Sandercock, P., & Frost, C. (2004). Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: does questionnaire length matter? Controlled Clinical Trials, 25(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.013 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eid, M., Geiser, C., Koch, T., & Heene, M. (2017). Anomalous results in G-factor models: Explanations and alternatives. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 541–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000083 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Emons, W. H., Sijtsma, K., & Meijer, R. R. (2007). On the consistency of individual classification using short scales. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.105 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Furr, R. M., & Heuckeroth, S. (2019). The “Quantifying Construct Validity” procedure: Its role, value, interpretations, and computation. Assessment, 26, 555–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118820638 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Glenn, A. L., & Sellbom, M. (2015). Theoretical and empirical concerns regarding the Dark Triad as a construct. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29(3), 360–377. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2014_28_162 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gordts, S., Uzieblo, K., Neumann, C., Van den Bussche, E., & Rossi, G. (2017). Validity of the Self-Report Psychopathy Scales (SRP-III full and short versions) in a community sample. Assessment, 24(3), 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115606205 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heene, M., Bollmann, S., & Bühner, M. (2014). Much ado about nothing, or much to do about something? Journal of Individual Differences, 35(4), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000146 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070551990954118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jakobwitz, S., & Egan, V. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(2), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jonason, P. K., Kaufman, S. B., Webster, G. D., & Geher, G. (2013). What lies beneath the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen: Varied relations with the Big Five. Individual Differences Research, 11(2), 81–90. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jonason, P. K., & Kavanagh, P. (2010). The dark side of love: Love styles and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 606–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.030 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Teicher, E. A. (2010). Who is James Bond? The Dark Triad as an agentic social style. Individual Differences Research, 8(2), 111–120. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Webster, G. D., & Schmitt, D. P. (2009). The Dark Triad: Facilitating a short‐term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.698 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The Dirty Dozen: A concise measure of the Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, D. N., & Neria, A. L. (2015). The Dark Triad and dispositional aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 360–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.021 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. LearyR. H. HoyleEds., Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93–108). Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2011). The role of impulsivity in the Dark Triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 679–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2017). Duplicity among the Dark Triad: Three faces of deceit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000139 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kemper, C. J., Trapp, S., Kathmann, N., Samuel, D. B., & Ziegler, M. (2018). Short versus long scales in clinical assessment: Exploring the trade-off between resources saved and psychometric quality lost using two measures of obsessive–compulsive symptoms. Assessment, 26, 767–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118810057 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krizan, Z., & Herlache, A. D. (2018). The narcissism spectrum model: A synthetic view of narcissistic personality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316685018 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Küfner, A. C. P., Dufner, M., & Back, M. D. (2015). Das Dreckige Dutzend und die Niederträchtigen Neun [The dirty dozen and the naughty nine]. Diagnostica, 61(2), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000124 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Lakens, D. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lämmle, L., Oedl, C., & Ziegler, M. (2014). Don’t threaten me and my dark side or even self-harm won’t stop me from hurting you. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.024 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leckelt, M., Wetzel, E., Gerlach, T. M., Ackerman, R. A., Miller, J. D., Chopik, W. J., Penke, L., Geukes, K., Küfner, A. C. P., Hutteman, R., Richter, D., Renner, K.-H., Allroggen, M., Brecheen, C., Campbell, W. K., Grossmann, I., & Back, M. D. (2018). Validation of the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire Short Scale (NARQ-S) in convenience and representative samples. Psychological Assessment, 30(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000433 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Wiltshire, J., Bourdage, J. S., Visser, B. A., & Gallucci, A. (2013). Sex, power, and money: Prediction from the Dark Triad and Honesty–Humility. European Journal of Personality, 27(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1860 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lynam, D. R., Hoyle, R. H., & Newman, J. P. (2006). The perils of partialling: Cautionary tales from aggression and psychopathy. Assessment, 13(3), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191106290562 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Malesza, M., Ostaszewski, P., Büchner, S., & Kaczmarek, M. C. (2017). The adaptation of the Short Dark Triad personality measure – psychometric properties of a German sample. Current Psychology, 38, 855–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9662-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McLarnon, M. J. W., & Tarraf, R. C. (2017). The Dark Triad: Specific or general sources of variance? A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 112, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.049 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, J. D., Few, L. R., Seibert, L. A., Watts, A., Zeichner, A., & Lynam, D. R. (2012). An examination of the Dirty Dozen measure of psychopathy: A cautionary tale about the costs of brief measures. Psychological Assessment, 24(4), 1048–1053. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028583 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Gaughan, E. T., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Keith Campbell, W. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1013–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00711.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, J. D., Hyatt, C. S., Maples-Keller, J. L., Carter, N. T., & Lynam, D. R. (2017). Psychopathy and Machiavellianism: A distinction without a difference? Journal of Personality, 85(4), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12251 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, J. D., Vize, C. E., Crowe, M. L., & Lynam, D. R. (2019). A critical appraisal of the Dark-Triad literature and suggestions for moving forward. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419838233 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Otgaar, H., & Meijer, E. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the Dark Triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916166666070 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Murray, A. L., & Johnson, W. (2013). The limitations of model fit in comparing the bi-factor versus higher-order models of human cognitive ability structure. Intelligence, 41, 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.06.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., Story, P. A., & White, C. D. (2015). A meta‐analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the dark triad and five‐factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 644–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12126 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L. (2001). Normal narcissism: Two minimalist accounts. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 228–230. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L., Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., & Jones, D. N. (2020). Screening for dark personalities: The Short Dark Tetrad (SD4). European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000602 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1113–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Persson, B. N., Kajonius, P. J., & Garcia, D. (2019). Revisiting the structure of the Short Dark Triad. Assessment, 26, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117701192 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rammstedt, B., & Beierlein, C. (2014). Can’t we make it any shorter? Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000141 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Rammstedt, B., Lechner, C. M., & Danner, D. (2020). Short forms do not fall short: A comparison of three (extra-)short forms of the Big Five. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000574 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Rauthmann, J. F. (2012). The Dark Triad and interpersonal perception: Similarities and differences in the social consequences of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(4), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611427608 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sherman, E. D., Miller, J. D., Few, L. R., Campbell, W. K., Widiger, T. A., Crego, C., & Lynam, D. R. (2015). Development of a short form of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory: The FFNI-SF. Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 1110–1116. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000100 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sleep, C. E., Lynam, D. R., Hyatt, C. S., & Miller, J. D. (2017). Perils of partialing redux: The case of the Dark Triad. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(7), 939–950. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000278 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thalmayer, A. G., Saucier, G., & Eigenhuis, A. (2011). Comparative validity of brief to medium-length Big Five and Big Six Personality questionnaires. Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 995–1009. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024165 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vize, C. E., Collison, K. L., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2018). Examining the effects of controlling for shared variance among the Dark Triad using meta-analytic structural equation modelling. European Journal of Personality, 32(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2137 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vize, C. E., Lynam, D. R., Collison, K. L., & Miller, J. D. (2016). Differences among dark triad components: A meta-analytic investigation. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000222 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ziegler, M. (2014). Stop and state your intentions! Let’s not forget the ABC of test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30(4), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000228 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Ziegler, M., & Bäckström, M. (2016). 50 facets of a trait – 50 ways to mess up? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32(2), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000372 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Ziegler, M., Kemper, C. J., & Kruyen, P. (2014). Short scales – five misunderstandings and ways to overcome them. Journal of Individual Differences, 35(4), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000148 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar