Validation of the Short Dark Triad in a German Sample
Structure, Nomological Network, and an Ultrashort Version
Abstract
Abstract. The structure, correlates, and assessment of the Dark Triad are widely discussed in several fields of psychology. Based on the German version of the Short Dark Triad (SDT), we add to this by (a) providing a competitive test of existing structural models, (b) testing the nomological network, and (c) proposing an ultrashort 9-item version of the SDT (uSDT). A sample of N = 969 participants provided data on the SDT and a range of further measures. Our competitive test of five structural models revealed that fit indices and nomological network assumptions were best met in a three-factor model, with separate factors for psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism. The results provided an extensive overview of the raw, unique, and shared associations of Dark Triad dimensions with narcissism facets, sadism, impulsivity, self-esteem, sensation seeking, the Big Five, maladaptive personality traits, sociosexual orientation, and behavioral criteria. Finally, the uSDT exhibited satisfactory psychometric properties. The highest overlap in expected relations between SDT and uSDT, and convergent and discriminant measures was also found for the three-factor model. Our study underlines the utility of a three-factor model of the Dark Triad, extends findings on its nomological network, and provides an ultrashort instrument.
References
2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 30–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.30
(2019). Current conceptualizations of narcissism. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 32(1), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000463
(2014). Standards for Educational & Psychological Testing, American Educational Research Association.
. (2005). Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(1), 41–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1201_3
(2009). On the self-regulatory dynamics created by the peculiar benefits and costs of narcissism: A contextual reinforcement model and examination of leadership. Self and Identity, 8(2–3), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860802505129
(2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: Towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.171
(2012). An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 874–888. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027403
(2019). Exploring the structure of narcissism: Towards an integrated solution. Journal of Personality, 87, 1151–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12464
(2016). Die deutsche Version des Big Five Inventory 2 (BFI-2)
([The German version of the Big Five Inventory 2] . Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen, https://doi.org/10.6012/zis2472004). Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: does questionnaire length matter? Controlled Clinical Trials, 25(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.013
(2017). Anomalous results in G-factor models: Explanations and alternatives. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 541–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000083
(2007). On the consistency of individual classification using short scales. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.105
(2019). The “Quantifying Construct Validity” procedure: Its role, value, interpretations, and computation. Assessment, 26, 555–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118820638
(2015). Theoretical and empirical concerns regarding the Dark Triad as a construct. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29(3), 360–377. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2014_28_162
(2017). Validity of the Self-Report Psychopathy Scales (SRP-III full and short versions) in a community sample. Assessment, 24(3), 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115606205
(2014). Much ado about nothing, or much to do about something? Journal of Individual Differences, 35(4), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000146
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070551990954118
(2006). The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(2), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.006
(2013). What lies beneath the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen: Varied relations with the Big Five. Individual Differences Research, 11(2), 81–90.
(2010). The dark side of love: Love styles and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 606–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.030
(2010). Who is James Bond? The Dark Triad as an agentic social style. Individual Differences Research, 8(2), 111–120.
(2009). The Dark Triad: Facilitating a short‐term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.698
(2010). The Dirty Dozen: A concise measure of the Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265
(2015). The Dark Triad and dispositional aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 360–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.021
(2009).
(Machiavellianism . In M. R. LearyR. H. HoyleEds., Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93–108). Guilford Press.2011). The role of impulsivity in the Dark Triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 679–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.011
(2014). Introducing the short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105
(2017). Duplicity among the Dark Triad: Three faces of deceit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000139
(2018). Short versus long scales in clinical assessment: Exploring the trade-off between resources saved and psychometric quality lost using two measures of obsessive–compulsive symptoms. Assessment, 26, 767–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118810057
(2018). The narcissism spectrum model: A synthetic view of narcissistic personality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316685018
(2015). Das Dreckige Dutzend und die Niederträchtigen Neun
([The dirty dozen and the naughty nine] . Diagnostica, 61(2), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a0001242017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177
(2014). Don’t threaten me and my dark side or even self-harm won’t stop me from hurting you. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.024
(2018). Validation of the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire Short Scale (NARQ-S) in convenience and representative samples. Psychological Assessment, 30(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000433
(2013). Sex, power, and money: Prediction from the Dark Triad and Honesty–Humility. European Journal of Personality, 27(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1860
(2006). The perils of partialling: Cautionary tales from aggression and psychopathy. Assessment, 13(3), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191106290562
(2017). The adaptation of the Short Dark Triad personality measure – psychometric properties of a German sample. Current Psychology, 38, 855–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9662-0
(2017). The Dark Triad: Specific or general sources of variance? A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 112, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.049
(2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568
(2012). An examination of the Dirty Dozen measure of psychopathy: A cautionary tale about the costs of brief measures. Psychological Assessment, 24(4), 1048–1053. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028583
(2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1013–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00711.x
(2017). Psychopathy and Machiavellianism: A distinction without a difference? Journal of Personality, 85(4), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12251
(2019). A critical appraisal of the Dark-Triad literature and suggestions for moving forward. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419838233
(2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the Dark Triad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916166666070
(2013). The limitations of model fit in comparing the bi-factor versus higher-order models of human cognitive ability structure. Intelligence, 41, 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.06.004
(2015). A meta‐analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the dark triad and five‐factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 644–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12126
(2001). Normal narcissism: Two minimalist accounts. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 228–230.
(2020). Screening for dark personalities: The Short Dark Tetrad (SD4). European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000602
(2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
(2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1113–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113
(2019). Revisiting the structure of the Short Dark Triad. Assessment, 26, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117701192
(2014). Can’t we make it any shorter? Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000141
(2020). Short forms do not fall short: A comparison of three (extra-)short forms of the Big Five. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000574
(2012). The Dark Triad and interpersonal perception: Similarities and differences in the social consequences of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(4), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611427608
(2015). Development of a short form of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory: The FFNI-SF. Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 1110–1116. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000100
(2017). Perils of partialing redux: The case of the Dark Triad. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(7), 939–950. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000278
(2011). Comparative validity of brief to medium-length Big Five and Big Six Personality questionnaires. Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 995–1009. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024165
(2018). Examining the effects of controlling for shared variance among the Dark Triad using meta-analytic structural equation modelling. European Journal of Personality, 32(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2137
(2016). Differences among dark triad components: A meta-analytic investigation. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000222
(2014). Stop and state your intentions! Let’s not forget the ABC of test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30(4), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000228
(2016). 50 facets of a trait – 50 ways to mess up? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32(2), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000372
(2014). Short scales – five misunderstandings and ways to overcome them. Journal of Individual Differences, 35(4), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000148
(