Skip to main content
Original Article

Validation of an Extended Violent Ideations Scale to Measure Both Non-Sexual and Sexual Violent Ideations (The VIS-X)

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000698

Abstract: A previous study developed and validated a multi-item instrument for the assessment of violent ideations, the “Violent Ideations Scale” (VIS). However, the final 12-item scale contained no items relating to sexual violence and was thus lacking an important dimension of violence. The current study explores an expansion of the original VIS to include ideations of sexual violence and investigates the psychometric properties of this new version: The Violent Ideations Scale-Extended (VIS-X). The VIS-X was completed by participants in the latest wave of the z-proso study (N = 1,177; 595 females, 580 males aged 19–22 years). Exploratory factor analysis was conducted in a calibration sample and confirmatory factor analysis in a validation sample to establish a two subscale structure as optimal. Cronbach’s α and Composite Reliability suggested good internal consistency. Nomological analysis supported the convergent validity of the scores.

References

  • Bartels, R. M., & Gannon, T. A. (2011). Understanding the sexual fantasies of sex offenders and their correlates. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(6), 551–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.08.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beauducel, A., & Wittmann, W. W. (2005). Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(1), 41–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1201_3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Belsky, J., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Poulton, R. (2020). The origins of you: How childhood shapes later life. Harvard University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bondü, R., & Birke, J. (2020). Links between aggressive sexual fantasies and presumably non-consensual aggressive sexual behavior when controlling for BDSM identity. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4119/IJCV-3777 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brucato, G., Appelbaum, P. S., Masucci, M. D., Rolin, S., Wall, M. M., Levin, M., Altschuler, R., First, M. B., Lieberman, J. A., & Girgis, R. R. (2019). Prevalence and phenomenology of violent ideation and behavior among 200 young people at clinical high-risk for psychosis: An emerging model of violence and psychotic illness. Neuropsychopharmacology, 44(5), 907–914. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-018-0304-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bushman, B. J., & Huesmann, L. R. (2006). Short-term and long-term effects of violent media on aggression in children and adults. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 160(4), 348–352. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.160.4.348 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Canales, D., Macaulay, A., McDougall, A., Wei, R., & Campbell, J. (2013). A brief synopsis of risk assessment screening tools for frontline professionals responding to intimate partner violence. Centre for Criminal Justice Studies, New Brunswick. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DeWall, C. N., Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2011). The general aggression model: Theoretical extensions to violence. Psychology of Violence, 1(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023842 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eisner, M., Averdijk, M., Kaiser, D., Murray, A. L., Nivette, A., Shanahan, L., Gelder, J., & Ribeaud, D. (2021). The association of polyvictimization with violent ideations in late adolescence and early adulthood: A longitudinal study. Aggressive Behavior, 47(4), 472–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21965 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eisner, N. L., Murray, A. L., Eisner, M., & Ribeaud, D. (2019). A practical guide to the analysis of non-response and attrition in longitudinal research using a real data example. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 43(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025418797004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Farrington, D. P. (2003). Key results from the first forty years of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. In T. P. ThornberryM. D. KrohnEds., Taking stock of delinquency. Longitudinal research in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary series (pp. 137–183). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47945-1_5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Folino, J. O. (2015). Predictive efficacy of violence risk assessment instruments in Latin-America. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 7(2), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.11.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Foshee, V. A. (1996). Gender differences in adolescent dating abuse prevalence, types and injuries. Health Education Research, 11(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/11.3.275-a First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. https://doi.org/10.7275/N560–J767 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427893030001002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Irwing, P., & Hughes, D. J. (2018). Test development. In P. IrwingT. BoothD. J. HughesEds., The Wiley handbook of psychometric testing (pp. 1–47). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118489772.ch1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krahé, B., Berger, A., Vanwesenbeeck, I., Bianchi, G., Chliaoutakis, J., Fernández-Fuertes, A. A., Fuertes, A., de Matos, M. G., Hadjigeorgiou, E., Haller, B., Hellemans, S., Izdebski, Z., Kouta, C., Meijnckens, D., Murauskiene, L., Papadakaki, M., Ramiro, L., Reis, M., Symons, K., … Zygadło, A. (2015). Prevalence and correlates of young people’s sexual aggression perpetration and victimisation in 10 European countries: A multi-level analysis. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(6), 682–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.989265 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284919 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Li, J.-B., Dou, K., Situ, Q.-M., Salcuni, S., Wang, Y.-J., & Friese, M. (2019). Anger rumination partly accounts for the association between trait self-control and aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.06.011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Llor-Esteban, B., García-Jiménez, J. J., Ruiz-Hernández, J. A., & Godoy-Fernández, C. (2016). Profile of partner aggressors as a function of risk of recidivism. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 16(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.05.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Loinaz, I. (2017). Manual de evaluación del riesgo de violencia. Metodología y ámbitos de aplicación [Violence risk assessment manual. Methodology and fields of application]. Pirámide. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McKenzie, K., Murray, A. L., Murray, G. C., Maguire, A., Eisner, M., & Ribeaud, D. (2021). Validation of the English language version of the Violent Ideations Scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5–6), 2942–2952. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518757227 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., Houts, R., Poulton, R., Roberts, B. W., Ross, S., Sears, M. R., Thomson, W. M., & Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 2693–2698. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010076108 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Murray, A. L., Eisner, M., & Ribeaud, D. (2018). Development and validation of a brief measure of violent thoughts: The Violent Ideations Scale (VIS). Assessment, 25(7), 942–955. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116667213 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Murray, A. L., Eisner, M., Ribeaud, D., Kaiser, D., McKenzie, K., & Murray, G. (2019). Validation of a brief self-report measure of adolescent bullying perpetration and victimization. Assessment, 28(1), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119858406 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Murray, A. L., Obsuth, I., Eisner, M., & Ribeaud, D. (2016). Shaping aggressive personality in adolescence: Exploring cross-lagged relations between aggressive thoughts, aggressive behaviour and self-control. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.022 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nagtegaal, M. H., Rassin, E., & Muris, P. (2006). Aggressive fantasies, thought control strategies, and their connection to aggressive behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(8), 1397–1407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.05.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nájera Catalán, H. E. (2019). Reliability, population classification and weighting in multidimensional poverty measurement: A Monte Carlo study. Social Indicators Research, 142(3), 887–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1950-z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Revelle, W., & Rocklin, T. (1979). Very simple structure: An alternative procedure for estimating the optimal number of interpretable factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14(4), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1404_2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ribeaud, D., Murray, A. L., Shanahan, L., Shanahan, M., & Eisner, M. (2021). Cohort Profile: The Zurich Project on Social Development from Childhood to Adulthood (z-proso). PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/pt53v First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roché, M. W., Boyle, D. J., Cheng, C.-C., Del Pozzo, J., Cherneski, L., Pascarella, J., Lukachko, A., & Silverstein, S. M. (2021). Prevalence and risk of violent ideation and behavior in serious mental illnesses: An analysis of 63,572 patient records. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5–6), 2732–2752. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518759976 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, B. G., Stein, N. D., Mumford, E. A., & Woods, D. (2013). Shifting boundaries: An experimental evaluation of a dating violence prevention program in middle schools. Prevention Science, 14(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0293-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Urruela, C., Booth, T., Eisner, M., Ribeaud, D., & Murray, A. L. (2021). Data and materials for “Validation of the Expanded Violent Ideation Scale (VIS-X)”. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/APW8Z First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vazsonyi, A. T., Mikuška, J., & Kelley, E. L. (2017). It’s time: A meta-analysis on the self-control-deviance link. Journal of Criminal Justice, 48, 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.10.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Viladrich, C., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Doval, E. (2017). Un viaje alrededor de alfa y omega para estimar la fiabilidad de consistencia interna [A trip around alpha and omega to estimate internal consistency reliability]. Anales de Psicología, 33(3), 755–782. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Woodworth, M., Freimuth, T., Hutton, E. L., Carpenter, T., Agar, A. D., & Logan, M. (2013). High-risk sexual offenders: An examination of sexual fantasy, sexual paraphilia, psychopathy, and offence characteristics. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 36(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.01.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zweig, W. R., Dank, M., Lachman, P., & Yahner, J. (2013). Technology, teen dating violence and abuse, and bullying. Urban Institute. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99(3), 432–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar