Privacy Needs in Office Environments
Development of Two Behavior-Based Scales
Abstract
Abstract. In this paper, we develop two behavior-based privacy-need measures for office environments. These two new scales are designed as objective measures, since they try to avoid introspection. One scale assesses people's motivation to withdraw from social interaction (i.e., the Need-For-Privacy [NFP]) and the other the motivation to seek social exchange (i.e., the Need-For-Socializing [NFS]). Based on survey data from 204 bank employees, our newly-developed measures demonstrated reasonable reliabilities (> .70). Regarding construct validity, we found our NFP scale to overlap (R2 > 25%) with an established NFP measure (Kaya & Weber, 2003) and a need-for-solitude instrument (Pedersen, 1988). The results also corroborate the fact that people's NFP and their NFS are relatively distinct motives (R2 = 10%).
References
(1975). The environment and social behavior . Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
(1976). Privacy: A conceptual analysis. Environment & Behavior, 8, 7– 29.
(1981). Dialectic conceptions in social psychology: An application to social penetration and privacy regulation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 107– 160.
(1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
(1977). The place of architectural factors in behavioral theories of privacy. Journal of Social Issues, 33(3), 116– 137.
(2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2002). Traditional versus open office design, a longitudinal field study. Environment & Behavior, 34, 279– 299.
(2000). The myth of open-plan. Facilities Design & Management, 19(2), 36– 38.
(2001). Disproving widespread myths about workplace design . Jasper, IN: Kimball International.
(1995). Individual differences in preference for solitude. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 85– 108.
(2003). Privacy van verpleeghuis-bewoners met dementie: De ontwikkeling van een meetinstrument op basis van gedrag [Privacy among nursing-home residents with dementia: Development of a behavior-based privacy measure] . Unpublished master's thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands.
(2005). The correction for attenuation due to measurement error: Clarifying concepts and creating confidence sets. Psychological Methods, 10, 206– 226.
(2001). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
(2000). Item response theory for psychologists . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1983). Aggregation and beyond: Some basic issues on the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality, 51, 360– 392.
(1984). A critical evaluation of Altman's definition of privacy as a dialectical process. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 14, 297– 307.
(2001). Traps and gaps in action explanation: Theoretical problems of a psychology of human action. Psychological Review, 108, 435– 451.
(1974). Privacy as personal control. In S.T. Margulis (Ed.), Man-environment interactions: Privacy (Vol. 2; pp. 83-100). Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson, & Ross.
(1998). A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 395– 422.
(2001). Zur Angemessenheit selbstberichteten Verhaltens: Eine Validitätsuntersuchung der Skala Allgemeinen Ökologischen Verhaltens [Accuracy of self-reports: Validating the General Ecological Behavior scale]. Diagnostica, 47, 88– 95.
(2000). Assessing people's general ecological behavior: A cross-cultural measure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 952– 978.
(2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1531– 1544.
(2003). Cross-cultural differences in the perception of crowding and privacy regulation: American and Turkish students. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 301– 309.
(1996). HEM: Directed means for improving current limits of privacy research. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 13, 310– 327.
(1998). Privacy in the workplace: The impact of building design. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 341– 356.
(2000). Privacy management at work: A conceptual model. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 17, 47– 63.
(1966). Test theory . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
(2003). On the status and contribution of Westin's and Altman's theories on privacy. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 411– 429.
(1972). Privacy and environment. Human Ecology, 1, 93– 110.
(2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397– 422.
(2002). Klachten bij baliewerkplekken: Gebrek aan privacy en gebrek aan controle bij informatiebalies . [Complaints at front desks: Lack of privacy and lack of control at information counters]. Unpublished master's thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands.
(1995). Perspectives on privacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 87– 104.
(1979). Dimensions of privacy. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 1291– 1297.
(1988). Correlates of privacy regulation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 595– 601.
(1999). Model for types of privacy by privacy functions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 397– 405.
(2005). The motivational and instantaneous behavior effects of contexts: Steps toward a theory of goal-directed behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2076– 2093.
(1986). Work places, the psychology of the physical environment in offices and factories . New York: Cambridge University Press.
(1980). Privacy regulation, territorial displays, and effectiveness of individual functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1104– 1115.
(2001). Tomorrow's offices through today's eyes: Effects of innovation in the working environment. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 4, 48– 65.
(1982). Privacy-seeking behavior in an elementary classroom. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2, 23– 35.
(1967). Privacy and freedom . New York: Atheneum.
(1982). Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement . Chicago: MESA.
(1997). Inquiry by design; tools for environment-behavior research . New York: Cambridge University Press.
