Mind Reading Using Neuroimaging
Is This the Future of Deception Detection?
Abstract
Traditional lie detection tools, such as the polygraph, voice stress analysis, or special interrogation techniques, rely on behavioral or psychophysiological manifestations of deception. With the advent of neuroimaging techniques, the question emerged whether it would be possible to directly identify deceit in the part of the body where it is generated: the brain. After a few promising studies, these techniques became soon commercially available and there have been attempts to use such results in the court in recent years. The current article reviews the development of neuroimaging techniques in the field of deception detection and critically discusses the potential but also the shortcomings of such methods. Unfortunately, the majority of research in this field was rather unsystematic and neglected the accumulated knowledge regarding methodological pitfalls that were extensively discussed in the scientific community in conjunction with the polygraph. Therefore, neuroimaging studies on deception largely differ with respect to the experimental paradigm (the interrogation technique), the methods for analyzing the data, and the procedures to obtain individual diagnoses. Moreover, most studies used artificial laboratory settings that differ considerably from real-life applications. As a consequence, neuroimaging techniques are not applicable for detecting deception in individual field cases at the moment. However, recent advantages such as multivariate pattern analysis might yield novel neuroimaging applications in the near future that are capable of improving established techniques for detecting deception or concealed knowledge.
References
(2008). Neural correlates of true memory, false memory, and deception. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2811–2819.
(2007). Deceiving others: Distinct neural responses of the prefrontal cortex and amygdala in simple fabrication and deception with social interactions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 287–295.
(2006). Dissociable roles of prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices in deception. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 192–199.
(2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 170–177.
(2002). A critical review of the Control Question Test (CQT). In , Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 103–126). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
(1996). Psychophysiological detection through the guilty knowledge technique: Effects of mental countermeasures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 273–281.
(2003). The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 131–151.
(1990). Theories and applications in the detection of deception: A psychophysiological and international perspective. New York, NY: Springer.
(2009). Lying about facial recognition: An fMRI study. Brain and Cognition, 69, 382–390. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.033
(2008). Detecting concealed information using brain-imaging technology. Neurocase, 14, 82–92.
(2012). The neural basis of vivid memory is patterned on perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1867–1883. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00253
(2009). The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: Evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1557–1566. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn189
(2008). The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind. Neuron, 58, 306–324. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017
(2011). A quantitative comparison of NIRS and fMRI across multiple cognitive tasks. NeuroImage, 54, 2808–2821. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.069
(2005). Classifying spatial patterns of brain activity with machine learning methods: Application to lie detection. NeuroImage, 28, 663–668.
(2012). Lying and executive control: An experimental investigation using ego depletion and goal neglect. Acta Psychologica, 140, 133–141. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.03.004
. (2008). Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1231 doi: 10.1038/nn1108-1231
(2012). The neural correlates of identity faking and concealment: An FMRI study. PLoS One, 7, e48639 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048639
(2002). A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87, 615–620.
(2009). Psychopathic traits and deception: Functional magnetic resonance imaging study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 194, 229–235.
(1986). Lie detection as psychophysiological differentiation: Some fine lines. In , Psychophysiology: Systems, processes, and applications – A handbook (pp. 683–700). New York, NY: Guilford.
(1988). Differentiation of deception as a psychological process: A psychophysiological approach. Psychophysiology, 25, 683–688.
(1994). Electrodermal differentiation of deception: The effect of choice versus no choice of deceptive items. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 18, 13–22.
(2010). Does the Guilty Actions Test allow for differentiating guilty participants from informed innocents? A re-examination. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 76, 19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.01.009
(2011). Detecting of deception and concealed information using neuroimaging techniques. In , Memory detection: Theory and application of the Concealed Information Test (pp. 90–113). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2007). Covariations among fMRI, skin conductance, and behavioral data during processing of concealed information. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 1287–1301. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20343
(2012). fMRI-activation patterns in the detection of concealed information rely on memory-related effects. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 506–515. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsp005
(2008). Combining physiological measures in the detection of concealed information. Physiology & Behavior, 95, 333–340. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.06.011
(2003). Neural correlates of different types of deception: An fMRI investigation. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 830–836.
(2011). Lying in the scanner: Covert countermeasures disrupt deception detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage, 55, 312–319. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.025
(2001). Psychophysiological differentiation of deception: The effects of electrodermal lability and mode of responding on skin conductance and heart rate. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40, 61–75.
(2007). Neuroscience-based lie detection: The urgent need for regulation. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 33, 377–431.
(2006). Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 523–534.
(2004). The psychophysiological detection of deception. In , The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 103–123). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2002). Countermeasures. In , Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 251–264). New York, NY: Academic Press.
(1996). Mental and physical countermeasures reduce the accuracy of the concealed knowledge test. Psychophysiology, 33, 84–92.
(1997). The role of comparison questions in physiological detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 34, 108–115.
(2012). A repeated lie becomes a truth? The effect of intentional control and training on deception. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 488 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00488
(2008). Effective policing: Understanding how polygraph tests work and are used. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1295–1308. doi: 10.1177/0093854808321529
(2012). The contribution of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to the preparation for deception and truth-telling. Brain Research, 1464, 43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.004
(2011). The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception when remembering neutral and emotional events. Neuroscience Research, 69, 121–128. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2010.11.001
(2011). Differential neural activity in the recognition of old versus new events: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 34, 814–836. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21474
(2009). Functional MRI detection of deception after committing a mock sabotage crime. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 54, 220–231.
(2009). Can simultaneously acquired electrodermal activity improve accuracy of fMRI detection of deception? Social Neuroscience, 4, 510–517. doi: 10.1080/17470910801907168
(2005). Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biological Psychiatry, 58, 605–613.
(2009). Replication of functional MRI detection of deception. Open Forensic Science Journal, 2, 6–11.
(2004). A replication study of the neural correlates of deception. Behavioral Neuroscience, 118, 852–856. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.4.852
(2004). A pilot study of functional magnetic resonance imaging brain correlates of deception in healthy young men. Journal of Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences, 16, 295–305.
(2008). Detection of deception with fMRI: Are we there yet? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13, 1–9. doi: 10.1348/135532507X251641
(2005). Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 26, 262–272.
(2002). Brain activity during simulated deception: An event-related functional magnetic resonance study. NeuroImage, 15, 727–732.
(2010). Lying about the valence of affective pictures: An fMRI study. PLoS One, 5, e12291 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012291
(1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 385–388.
(1974). Psychology and the lie detector industry. American Psychologist, 29, 725–739.
(1998). A tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
(2001). A quantitative review of the Guilty Knowledge Test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 674–683.
(2012). Sex, lies and fMRI – gender differences in neural basis of deception. PLoS One, 7, e43076 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043076
(1938). The lie detector test. New York, NY: Smith.
(1996). Forensic psychophysiology using the polygraph: Scientific truth verification – lie detection. Williamsville, NY: J. A. M..
(2011). The influence of fMRI lie detection evidence on juror decision‐making. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 577, 566–577. doi: 10.1002/bsl
(2009). Detection of deception using fMRI: Better than chance, but well below perfection. Social Neuroscience, 4, 528–538. doi: 10.1080/17470910801903530
(2002). Practical use of the concealed information test for criminal investigation in Japan. In , Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 49–86). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
. (2003). The polygraph and lie detection. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
(2009). Disclosing concealed information on the basis of cortical activations. NeuroImage, 44, 1380–1386.
(2005). Intentional false responding shares neural substrates with response conflict and cognitive control. NeuroImage, 25, 267–277. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.041
(1989). Psychopathy, threat, and polygraph test accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 347–355.
(2005). Neural correlates of telling lies: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study at 4 tesla. Academic Radiology, 12, 164–172.
(2002). The comparison question test. In , Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 1–47). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
(1947). A revised questioning technique in lie detection tests. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 37, 542–547.
(2004). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science, 306, 443–447. doi: 10.1126/science.1100301
(2010). Detecting individual memories through the neural decoding of memory states and past experience. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 9849–9854.
(2012). Modelling neural correlates of working memory: A coordinate-based meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 60, 830–846. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.050
(2013). Prospects of functional magnetic resonance imaging as lie detector. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 594 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00594
(2010). Neuroscience, lie-detection, and the law: Contrary to the prevailing view, the suitability of brain-based lie-detection for courtroom or forensic use should be determined according to legal and not scientific standards. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 101–103.
(2008). Functional MRI lie detection: Too good to be true? Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 36, 491–498.
(2013). When Pinocchio’s nose does not grow: Belief regarding lie-detectability modulates production of deception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1–11. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00016
(2010). The production and detection of deception in an interactive game. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3619–3626. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.013
(2008). Detecting deception: The scope and limits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.008
(2001). Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. Neuroreport, 12, 2849–2853.
(2008). “Munchausen’s syndrome by proxy” or a “miscarriage of justice”? An initial application of functional neuroimaging to the question of guilt versus innocence. European Psychiatry, 23, 309–314.
(2008). Speaking of secrets and lies: The contribution of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex to vocal deception. NeuroImage, 40, 1411–1418.
(2009). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy to investigate hemodynamic responses to deception in the prefrontal cortex. Brain Research, 1303, 120–130.
. No. 07e10074 M1/P, Report and Recommendation (W.D. Tenn. May 31, 2010.
(2012). Learning to lie: Effects of practice on the cognitive cost of lying. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00526
(2011). The ease of lying. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 908–911. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.10.023
(2008). Detecting lies and deceit. Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
, 2010 NY Slip Op 20176, 1 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2010); 900 N.Y.S.2d 639; 2010 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1044 (2010).
