Unique and Shared Relationship Benefits of Consensually Non-Monogamous and Monogamous Relationships
A Review and Insights for Moving Forward
Abstract
Abstract. The increased media and public curiosity on the topic of consensual non-monogamy (CNM) presents an interesting case, given that these types of relationships are highly stigmatized. In the present review piece, we first situate common themes of benefits that people believe are afforded to them by their CNM relationships within the current state of the literature to provide insight into unique and shared (with monogamy) relationship benefits. This approach helps uncover relationship benefits and theoretical advances for research on CNM by highlighting some of the key features of CNM relationships that people find rewarding, including need fulfillment, variety of activities, and personal growth and development. Second, we discuss common misconceptions about CNM and stigma toward CNM. Finally, we conclude with future directions and recommendations for scholars interested in pursuing research on CNM.
References
(2013). Situational sexual behaviors: The ideological work of moving toward polyamory in communal living groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 42, 104–129.
(2010). Polyamory in the 21st century: Love and intimacy with multiple partners. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
(2008). Make love, now law: Perceptions of the marriage equality struggle among polyamorous activists. Journal of Bisexuality, 7, 261–286.
(2015). The future of polyamorous marriage: Lessons from the marriage equality struggle. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, 38, 269–336.
(2005). This is my partner, and this is my… partner’s partner: Constructing a polyamorous identity in a monogamous world. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18, 75–88.
(2013).
Polyamorous intimacies: From one love to many loves and back again . In T. SangerY. TaylorEds., Mapping Intimacies (pp. 190–208). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.(2010). Whatever happened to non-monogamies? Critical reflections on recent research and theory. Sexualities, 13, 748–772.
. (2012, August). Three-person civil union sparks controversy in Brazil. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-19402508
(2015). My Life on the Swingset: Adventures in Swinging & Polyamory. Chicago, IL: Hump and Circumstance.
(2005, November). Dutch Minister not to prevent polygamy. The Brussels Journal. Retrieved from http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/421
(2010). Swinging in America: Love, sex, and marriage in the 21st century. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
(2014). Torn between two lovers? Lay perceptions of polyamorous individuals. Psychology & Sexuality, 5, 258–267.
(1979). Traditional marriage and emerging alternatives. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.
(1989). Variant lifestyles and relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
(2014). My Spivak is bigger than yours: (Mis-)representations of polyamory in the Portuguese LGBT movement and mononormative rhetorics. LES Online, 6, 45–64.
(2012).
“Loving Many”: Polyamorous love, gender and identity . In N. H. GarciaM. A. TseliouEds., Gender and love: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 21–29). Oxford, UK: Inter-Disciplinary Press.(2000). Adult romantic attachments: A developmental perspective on individual differences. Review of General Psychology, 4, 111–131.
(1973). Induction into mate‐swapping: A review. Family Process, 12, 279–290.
(2015). Re-examining the effectiveness of monogamy as an STI-preventive strategy. Preventive Medicine, 78, 23–28.
(in press). The Investigation of consensually non-monogamous relationships: Theories, methods and new directions. Perspectives on Psychological Science.
(2014). More oxygen please! How polyamorous relationship strategies might oxygenate marriage. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 56–63.
(2013). The fewer the merrier: Assessing stigma surrounding non-normative romantic relationships. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13, 1–30.
(2015). Sexuality-related risks are judged more harshly than comparable health risks. International Journal of Sexual Health, 27, 508–521.
(2012). Unfaithful individuals are less likely to practice safer sex than openly nonmonogamous individuals. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9, 1559–1565.
(2013). Condom use errors among sexually unfaithful and consensually nonmonogamous individuals. Sexual Health, 10, 463–464.
(2013). A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 124–141.
(2009). A little thing called love: Condom use in high‐risk primary heterosexual relationships. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41, 218–224.
(2013). What do polys want? An overview of the 2012 Loving More survey. Loving More Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.lovemore.com/polyamory-articles/2012-lovingmore-polyamory-survey/
(2016). Why people defend relationship ideology. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33, 348–360. doi: 10.1177/0265407515613164
(2011). System justification and the defense of committed relationship ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 291–306.
(2005). Singles in society and in science. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 57–83.
(2015). Love’s refraction: Jealousy and compersion in queer women’s polyamorous relationships. Toronto, CA: University of Toronto Press.
(1992). Should I stay or should I go? A dependence model of breakups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 62–87.
(1997). The ethical slut: A guide to infinite sexual possibilities (1st ed.). Emeryville, CA: Greenery Press.
(2004). Monogamy’s law: Compulsory monogamy and polyamorous existence. New York University Review of Law & Social Change, 29, 277–376.
(2008).
Adult romantic attachment: Developments in the study of couple relationships . In J. CassidyP. R. ShaverEds., Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 456–481). New York, NY: Guilford Press.(2014). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 1–41.
(2004). Powerful voices and powerful stories: Reflections on the challenges and dynamics of intercultural research. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 25, 233–245.
(2015). Marriage and family: LGBT individuals and same-sex couples. The Future of Children, 25, 67–87.
(2013). Children of polyamorous families: A first empirical look. Journal of Law and Social Deviance, 5, 150–243.
(2013).
Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism . In P. DevineA. PlantEds., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55–130). Burlington, MA: Academic Press.(2008). Comparing the impact of bullying and sexual harassment victimization on the mental and physical health of adolescents. Sex Roles, 59, 1–13.
(2016). Around consensual nonmonogamies: Assessing attitudes toward nonexclusive relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 45–53.
(2010).
Jealousy in adulthood . In C. R. HarrisR. S. DarbyEds., Handbook of jealousy: Theory, research, and multidisciplinary approaches (pp. 547–571). Malden, MS: Wiley-Blackwell.(2016). Prevalence of experiences with consensual non-monogamous relationships: Findings from two nationally representative samples of single Americans. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 1–17. Advance Online Publication. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.0092016.1178675
(1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.
(2016). Three’s a crowd: Public awareness and (mis)perceptions of polyamory. Psychology & Sexuality, 7, 69–87. doi: 10.1080/19419899.2015.1004102
(2004). The personal is still political: Heterosexuality, feminism and monogamy. Feminism & Psychology, 14, 151–157.
(1985). Swinging: A replication and test of a theory. The Journal of Sex Research, 21, 199–205. doi: 10.1080/00224498509551258
(1982). Couple involvement and network structure: A test of the dyadic withdrawal hypothesis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 34–43.
(2015). Development of a brief measure of attitudes towards polyamory. Psychology & Sexuality, 6, 325–339.
(2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.
(2003). Friendship networks over the life course: A test of the dyadic withdrawal hypothesis using survey data on couples. Social Networks, 25, 231–249.
(2015). From fantasy to reality: A grounded theory of experiences in the swinging lifestyle. Archives of Sexual Behavior, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0621-2
(2006). Polyamory and its “others”: Contesting the terms of non-monogamy. Sexualities, 9, 565–583.
(2014). Poly economics – capitalism, class, and polyamory. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 27, 203–220.
(1976). An exploratory study of seventeen sexually open marriages. Journal of Sex Research, 12, 206–219.
(2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 184–194.
(1986). Relationship quality of gay men in closed or open relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 12, 85–99.
(2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 367.
(2015). A comparison of sexual health history and practices among monogamous and consensually nonmonogamous sexual partners. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12, 2022–2028. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12987
(2011). Relationship characteristics and contraceptive use among young adults. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 43, 119–128.
(2015, October). The three Brazilian brides who are challenging the traditional family unit. Sao Paulo, Brazil: El País. Retrieved from http://elpais.com/elpais/2015/10/27/inenglish/1445948093_804967.html
(2014). Love and sex: Polyamorous relationships are perceived more favourably than swinging and open relationships. Psychology & Sexuality, 5, 339–348.
(2008).
The five-factor theory of personality . In O. P. JohnR. W. RobinsL. A. PervinEds., Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 159–181). New York, NY: Guilford Press.(2005). What international experience can tell U.S. courts about same-sex marriage. UCLA Law Review, 53, 1073–1105.
(2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674–697.
(2014). Eight things I wish I’d known about polyamory: Before I tried it and frakked it up. Seattle, WA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
(2014). Need fulfillment in polyamorous relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 329–339.
(2016). Has the American public’s interest in information related to relationships beyond “the couple” increased over time? Journal of Sex Research. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1178208
(2015). Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage (but not actual engagement) in consensual non-monogamy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 222–240.
(2013). Stigma toward individuals engaged in consensual non-monogamy: Robust and worthy of additional research. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13, 52–69.
(2014). It’s not just a gay male thing: Sexual minority women and men are equally attracted to consensual non-monogamy. Journal für Psychologie, 22, 38–51.
(2014). Understanding sexuality: Implications of Rubin for relationship research and clinical practice. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 29, 476–482.
(2016). Personality correlates of attitudes and desire to engage in consensual non-monogamy among sexual minorities, Unpublished manuscript.
(1999). The lesbian polyamory reader: Open relationships, non-monogamy, and casual sex. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
(2000). Polyamory demography – the “Loving More Magazine” study. Bloomington, IN: Kinsey Institute, Indiana University. Retrieved from www.kinseyinstitute.org/resources/Nearing.html
(1972). Open marriage; a new life style for couples. New York, NY: M. Evans.
(2010). “Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 653–663.
(1995).
Choosing not to choose: Beyond monogamy, beyond duality . In C. GuerraR. WhiteEds., Breaking the Barriers of Desire (pp. 41–67). London, UK: Five Leaves Publication.(2010).
“To pass, border or pollute”: Polyfamilies go to school . In M. BarkerD. LangdridgeEds., Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 182–187). New York, NY: Routledge.(1982). Alternative life styles to monogamous marriage: Variants of normal behavior in psychotherapy clients. Family Relations, 31, 425–434.
(2010). Constructing anarchist sexuality: Queer identity, culture, and politics in the anarchist movement. Sexualities, 13, 479–493.
(2015). Public opinion, the courts, and same-sex marriage four lessons learned. Social Currents, 2, 3–12.
(1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs, 5, 631–660.
(2006). “There aren’t words for what we do or how we feel so we have to make them up”: Constructing polyamorous languages in a culture of compulsory monogamy. Sexualities, 9, 584–601.
(2007). Hot bi babes and feminist families: Polyamorous women speak out. Lesbian and Gay Psychology Review, 8, 141–151.
(1997). My baby just cares for me: Feminism, heterosexuality and non‐monogamy. Journal of Gender Studies, 6, 143–157.
(1994).
Anti-monogamy: A radical challenge to compulsory heterosexuality . In G. GriffinM. HesterS. RaiS. RoseneilEds., Stirring it: Challenges for feminism (pp. 107–120). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.(2015). Consensual nonmonogamy: Psychological well-being and relationship quality correlates. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 961–982.
(1984).
Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality . In C. S. VanceEd., Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality (pp. 267–319). Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.(2014). On the margins: Considering diversity among consensually non-monogamous relationships. Journal für Psychologie, 22, 1–23.
(2010). Sex at dawn: The prehistoric origins of modern sexuality. New York, NY: Harper.
(2012, January). Meet the Monogamish. The Stranger. Retrieved from http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/SavageLove?oid=11412386
(2010).
Asexual relationships: What does asexuality have to do with polyamory . In M. BarkerD. LangdridgeEds., Understanding Non-monogamies (pp. 154–159). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.(2014). The consequences of perceived discrimination for psychological well-being: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 921–948.
(2011). Polyamorous families, same-sex marriage, and the slippery slope. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 40, 487–520.
(2015). Polyamorists Next Door: Inside Multiple-Partner Relationships and Families. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
(2011). The privilege of perversities: Race, class and education among polyamorists and kinksters. Psychology & Sexuality, 2, 198–223.
(2015).
Consensual non-monogamies in industrialized nations . In J. DeLamaterR. F. PlanteEds., Handbook of the Sociology of Sexualities (pp. 223–242). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.(1998).
Doing personality research: How can feminist theories help? . In B. McVicker ClinchyJ. K. NoremEds., The gender and psychology reader (pp. 54–68). New York, NY: New York University Press.(2016). Monogamy, the protective fallacy: Sexual versus emotional exclusivity and the implication for sexual health risk. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 64–73.
(2016). Gay men’s (non) monogamy ideals and lived experience. Sex Roles, 75, 43–55.
(2014). More than two: A practical guide to ethical polyamory. Portland, OR: Thorntree Press, LLC.
(2007). Swings and roundabouts: Management of jealousy in heterosexual “swinging” couples. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 459–476.
(2010).
What’s queer about non-monogamy now . In M. BarkerD. LangdridgeEds., Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 243–254). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.(2010). Agreements, rules and agentic fidelity in polyamorous relationships. Psychology & Sexuality, 1, 44–61.
(2015).
Monogamy . In C. RichardsM. BarkerEds., Psychology of sexuality and relationships handbook (pp. 219–235). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.(2014). Does monogamy harm women? Deconstructing monogamy with a feminist lens. Journal für Psychologie, 22, 1–18.
(1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757–768.
