Skip to main content
Original Articles and Reviews

Decision Inertia in Critical Incidents

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000320

Abstract. When presented with competing options, critical incident decision makers often struggle to commit to a choice (in particular when all options appear to yield negative consequences). Despite being motivated to take action in disasters, terrorism, major investigations, and complex political interventions, decision makers can become inert, looping between phases of situation assessment, option generation, and option evaluation. This “looping” is functionally redundant when it persists until they have lost the opportunity to take action. We define this as “decision inertia”: the result of a process of (redundant) deliberation over possible options and in the absence of any further useful information. In the context of critical incidents (political, security, military, law enforcement) we have discovered that rather than disengaging and avoiding difficult choices, decision makers are acutely aware of the negative consequences that might arise if they failed to decide (i.e., the incident would escalate). The sensitization to possible future outcomes leads to intense deliberation over possible choices and their consequences and, ultimately, can result in a failure to take any action in time (or at all). We (i) discuss decision inertia as a novel psychological process of redundant deliberation during crises; (ii) define the concept and discuss the emerging studies in support of our tentative hypotheses regarding how the cognitively active process of deliberation can result in complete behavioral inactivity; and (iii) suggest recommendations and interventions for combatting inertia.

References

  • Achtziger, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2007). Rubicon model of action phases. Encyclopedia of Social Psychology, 2, 769–770. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412956253.n461 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Alison, L., & Crego, J. (2007). Policing critical incidents: Leadership and critical incident management. Devon, UK: Willan Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203817988 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Alison, L., Power, N., van den Heuvel, C., Humann, M., Palasinksi, M., & Crego, J. (2015). Decision inertia: Deciding between least worst outcomes in emergency responses to disasters. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 88, 295–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12108 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alison, L., Power, N., van den Heuvel, C., & Waring, S. (2015). A taxonomy of endogenous and exogenous uncertainty in high-risk, high-impact contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1309–1318. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038591 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alison, L., van den Heuvel, C., Waring, S., Power, N., Long, A., & O’Hara, T. (2013). Immersive simulated learning environments for researching critical incidents: A knowledge synthesis of the literature and experiences of studying high-risk strategic decision-making. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 7, 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343412468113 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alos-Ferrer, C., Hugelschafer, S., & Li, J. (2016). Inertia and decision making. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00169 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, C. J. (2003). The Psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.139 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beeler, J. D., & Hunton, J. E. (1997). The influence of compensation method and disclosure level on information search strategy and escalation of commitment. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 10, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199706)10:2<77::AID-BDM248>3.0.CO;2-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bharosa, N., Lee, J., & Janssen, M. (2010). Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: Propositions from field exercises. Information Systems Frontier, 12, 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9174-z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boin, A., & ‘t Hart, P. (2010). Organising for effective emergency management: Lessons from research. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69, 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2010.00694.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bond, L., & Nolan, T. (2011). Making sense of perceptions of risk of diseases and vaccinations: A qualitative study combining models of health beliefs, decision-making and risk perception. Public Health, 11, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-943 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bornstein, B. H., Emler, C. A., & Chapman, G. B. (1999). Rationality in medical treatment decisions: Is there a sunk-cost effect? Social Science & Medicine, 49, 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00117-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boyd, R. L., Robinson, M. D., & Fetterman, A. K. (2011). Miller (1944) revisited: Movement times in relation to approach and avoidance conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1192–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.04.017 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Braverman, J. A., & Blumenthal-Barby, J. S. (2012). Assessment of the sunk-cost effect in clinical decision-making. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brooks, M. E. (2011). Management indecision. Management Decision, 49, 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111130788 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, M., Ma, X., & Pethtel, O. (2011). Age differences in trade-off decisions: Older adults prefer choice deferral. Psychology and Ageing, 26, 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021582 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, R., Sharman, R., Rao, H. R., & Upadhyaya, S. J. (2008). Coordination in emergency response management: Developing a framework to analze coordination patterns occurring in the emergency response life cycle. Communications of the ACM, 51, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/1342327.1342340 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clinton, H. (2014). Hard choices. London, UK: Simon & Schuster UK Ltd. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen-Hatton, S. R., Butler, P. C., & Honey, R. C. (2015). An investigation of operational decision-making in situ: Incident command in the UK Fire and Rescue service. Human Factors, 57, 793–804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815578266 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Colvin Clark, R. (2014). Evidence-based training methods. Alexandria, VA: ATD Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Corr, P. J., DeYoung, C. G., & McNaughton, N. (2013). Motivation and personality: A neuropsychological perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12016 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Corr, P. J., & McNaughton, N. (2012). Neuroscience and approach/avoidance personality traits: A two stage (valuation-motivation) approach. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews, 36, 2339–2354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.09.013 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Crotty, S. K., & Thompson, L. (2009). When your heart isn’t smart: How different types of regret change decisions and profits. International Journal of Conflict Management, 20, 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444060910991048 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Decker, P., Durand, R., Mayfield, C. O., McCormack, C., Skinner, D., & Perdue, G. (2012). Predicting implementation failure in organization change. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 16, 39–59. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dhar, R. (1997). Context and task effects on choice deferral. Marketing Letters, 8, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007997613607 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dholakia, U. M., Gopinath, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2005). The role of desires in sequential impulsive choices. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 98, 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.05.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dijkstra, K. A., van der Pligt, J., & van Kleef, G. A. (2013). Deliberation versus intuition: Decomposing the role of expertise in judgment and decision-making. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 26, 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1759 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Elliot, A. J. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivations and Emotion, 30, 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643–669. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884324 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eyre, M., Alison, L., Crego, J., & Mclean, C. (2008). Decision inertia: The impact of organisations on critical incident decision-making. In L. J. AlisonJ. CregoEds., Policing critical incidents: Leadership and critical incident management (pp. 201–235). Devon, UK: Willan Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203817988 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gibbons, F. X., & Buunk, B. P. (1999). Indifferences in social comparison: Development and validation of a measure of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.129 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. The American Psychologist, 54, 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.54.7.493 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grünewald, F., Binder, A., & Georges, Y. (2010). Inter-agency real time evaluation in Haiti: Three months after the earthquake. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/evaldatabase/index_59796.html. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Harmon-Jones, E., Harmon-Jones, C., & Price, T. F. (2013). What is approach motivation? Emotion Review, 5, 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913477509 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heckhausen, H., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1987). Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind. Motivation and Emotion, 11, 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00992338 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heuer, R. J. (1999). Psychology of intelligence analysis. Washington, DC: Centre for the Study of Intelligence. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hoffman, R. R., Ward, P., Feltovich, P. J., DiBello, L., Fiore, S. M., & Andrews, D. (2013). Accelerated expertise: Training for high proficiency in a complex world. Hove, UK: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203797327 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kalis, A., Mojzisch, A., Schweizer, T. S., & Kaiser, S. (2008). Weakness of will, akrasia, and the neuropsychiatry of decision-making: An interdisciplinary perspective. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 402–417. https://doi.org/10.3758/cabn.8.4.402 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Karniol, R., & Ross, M. (1996). The motivational impact of temporal focus: Thinking about the future and the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 593–596. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.593 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klein, G. (2008). Naturalistic decision making. Human Factors, 50(3), 456–460. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288385 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klein, G., Calderwood, R., & Clinton-Cirocco, A. (2010). Rapid decision making on the fire ground: The original study plus postscript. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 4, 186–209. https://doi.org/10.1518/155534310x12844000801203 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klein, G. A., Snowden, D., & Pin, C. L. (2007, June). Anticipatory thinking. Proceedings of the Eighth International NDM Conference, Pacific Grove, CA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kumar, P. (2004). The effects of social comparison on inaction inertia. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.06.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lipshitz, R., & Strauss, O. (1997). Coping with uncertainty: A naturalistic decision-making analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1997.2679 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.28-0608 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mamhidir, A. G., Kihlgren, M., & Sorlie, V. (2007). Ethical challenges related to elder care. High-level decision-makers’ experiences. BMC Medical Ethics, 8, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-8-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Militello, L. G., Sushreba, C. E., Branlat, M., Bean, R., & Finomore, V. (2015). Designing for military pararescue: Naturalistic decision-making perspective, methods, and frameworks. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88, 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12114 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • National Audit Office/Foreign & Commonwealth Office. (2005). Joint findings on lessons to be learned from the handling of the response to the Indian Ocean tsunami. Retrieved from http://www.nao.org.uk/report/consular-services-to-british-nationals/. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N., & Simonson, I. (2007). Preference fluency in choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.3.347 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Orasanu, J., & Lieberman, P. (2011). NDM issues in extreme environments. In K. L. MosierU. M. FischerEds., Informed by knowledge (pp. 3–22). Hove, UK: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847985 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Patrick, J. (2011). Evaluation insights haiti earthquake response emerging evaluation lessons. Evaluation Insights, 1, 1–13. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Parker, J. R., & Schrift, R. Y. (2011). Rejectable choice sets: How seemingly irrelevant no-choice options affect consumer decision processes. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 840–845. https://doi.org/10.1037/e621072012-132 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Patalano, A. L., & Wengrovitz, S. M. (2007). Indecisiveness and response to risk in deciding when to decide. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(4), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.560 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Patel, V. L., Cohen, T., Muraka, T., Olsen, J., Kagita, S., Myeni, S., … Ghaemmaghami, V. (2011). Recovering at the edge of error: Debunking the myth of the infallible expert. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 44, 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2010.09.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paton, D., & Flin, R. (1999). Disaster stress: An emergency management perspective. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 8, 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653569910283897 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pitt, M. (2008). Flood Review: Learning lessons from the 2007 floods. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100807034701/http:/archive.cabinetoffice.gov.u006B/pittreview/_/media/assets/www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/flooding_review/pitt_review_full%20pdf.pdf. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Power, N., & Alison, L. (2017). Redundant deliberation about negative consequences: Decision inertia in emergency responders. Psychology, Public Policy & Law, 23, 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000114 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rebetez, M. M. L., Carsics, C., Rochat, L., D’Argembeu, A., & van den Linden, M. (2016). Procrastination, consideration of future consequences and episodic future thinking. Consciousness and Cognition, 42, 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.04.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roskes, M., Elliot, A. J., Nijstad, B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2013). Time pressure undermines performance under avoidance than approach motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 803–813. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2013.11282abstract First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roswarski, T. E., & Murray, M. D. (2006). Supervision of students may protect academic physicians from cognitive bias: A study of decision-making and multiple treatment alternatives in medicine. Medical Decision Making, 26, 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x06286483 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shortland, N., Alison, L., & Moran, J. (in press). Conflict: How soldiers make impossible decisions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042769 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independent of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 94, 672–695. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Taleai, M., & Mansourian, A. (2008). Using Delphi-AHP method to survey major factors causing urban plan implementation failure. Journal of Applied Sciences, 8, 2746–2751. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2008.2746.2751 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thomas, A., Buboltz, W. C., Teague, S., & Seemann, E. A. (2011). The Multidimensionality of the Desirability of Control Scale (Burger & Cooper, 1979). Individual Differences Research, 9, 173–182. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • UNICEF. (2008). 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami: Lessons learned. UNICEF. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/har08/index_tsunami.html. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • van den Heuvel, C., Alison, L., & Crego, J. (2012). How uncertainty and accountability can derail strategic “save life” decisions in counter-terrorism simulations: A descriptive model of choice deferral and omission bias. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.723 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Dijk, E., & Zeelenberg, M. (2005). On the psychology of “if only”: Regret and the comparison between factual and counterfactual outcomes. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 97, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.04.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Harreveld, F., van der Pligt, J., & Nordgren, L. (2008). The relativity of bad decisions: Social comparison as a means to alleviate regret. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607x260134 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Putten, M., Zeelenberg, M., & van Dijk, E. (2009). Dealing with missed opportunities: Action vs. state orientation moderates inaction inertia. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 808–815. https://doi.org/10.1037/e722352011-012 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • White, C. M., & Hoffrage, U. (2009). Testing the tyranny of too much choice against the allure of more choice. Psychology and Marketing, 26, 280–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20273 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • White, C. M., Hafenbradl, S., Hoffrage, U., Reisein, N., & Woike, J. K. (2011). Are groups more likely to defer choice than their members? Judgement and Decision Making, 6, 239–251. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wong, K. F. E., Yik, M., & Kwong, J. Y. Y. (2006). Understanding the emotional aspects of escalation of commitment: The role of negative affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 282–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.282 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yates, J. F. (2003). Decision management. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zeelenberg, M., & van Dijk, E. (1997). A reverse sunk cost effect in risky decision-making: Sometimes we have too much invested to gamble. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-4870(97)00029-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, W. W., Manstead, A. S. R., & van der Pligt, J. (2000). On bad decisions and disconfirmed expectancies: The psychology of regret and disappointment. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 521–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402781 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar