What Doesn’t Work to Reduce Reoffending?
A Review of Reviews of Ineffective Interventions for Adults Convicted of Crimes
Abstract
Abstract. This paper describes a review of meta-analyses and systematic reviews, to explore what appears to be ineffective in reducing reoffending among people convicted of crime. The focus of this review is on secondary or tertiary crime prevention initiatives, concentrating on interventions aiming to reduce offending among adults serving sentences in custody or the community. Twenty-one reviews met the inclusion criteria, covering interventions aiming to reduce violence, domestic violence, sexual offending, drug misuse, driving under the influence, and general reoffending. Fourteen of these reviews identified interventions that have no impact on criminal recidivism, and three identified interventions that in at least one study were actively harmful by increasing the risk of recidivism of participants. Findings suggest that ineffective interventions may comprise drug testing as a stand-alone strategy, insight-oriented and behavioral interventions for sexual offending, brief interventions for alcohol misuse, and in prison in the longer-term, agonist pharmacological treatment alone for drug misuse. Those interventions that had demonstrated, in at least one of the evaluations reviewed, that they were associated with negative behaviors were court-mandated treatment for domestic violence, boot camps, incarceration-based agonist drug treatment and custodial (when compared to noncustodial) sanctions. Taken together with the findings of previous reviews in this area, the authors identify features of interventions which are likely to be ineffective in reducing reoffending. Explanations for these interventions’ likely failure to reduce reoffending draw on criminological and social psychological research and behavioral science. The authors also note that this review may not include all relevant evidence and findings should therefore be considered indicative.
References *Meta-analyses and systematic reviews used in this study
2015). Time limiting opioid substitution therapy, Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/371521/ACMD_RC_Time_limiting_OST_061114.pdf
. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
(1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369–404.
(2006). Evidence-based adult corrections programs: What works and what does not. Olympia, Greece: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
(2017). A systematic review of the effectiveness of the electronic monitoring of offenders. London, UK: What Works Centre for Crime Reduction.
(2015). National Offender Management Service analytical summary: An outcome evaluation of the Integrated Domestic Abuse Program (IDAP) and Community Domestic Violence Program (CDVP). London, UK: National Offender Management Service. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/449008/outcome-evaluation-idap-cdvp.pdf
(*2016). Aggression replacement training for reducing antisocial behaviour in adolescents and adults: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 27, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.02.006
(*2014). How effective is correctional education, and where do we go from here? The results of a comprehensive evaluation. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
(1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071001001
(2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
(*2012). Psychological interventions for adults who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012, 1–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007507.pub2
(2009). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce crime and criminal justice costs: Implications in Washington State. Victims and Offenders, 4, 170–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880802612615
(*2013). The effectiveness of intervention programs for perpetrators and victims of intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 4, 196–231. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.4.2.196
(2002).
(The Maryland Scientific Methods Scale . In L. W. ShermanD. P. FarringtonB. C. WelshD. L. MacKenzieEds., Evidence-based crime prevention (pp. 3–21). London, UK: Routledge.2009). Chaos theory and correctional treatment: Common sense, correctional quackery and the law of fartcatchers. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 25, 384–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986209344552
(2010). Evidence-based practices in addiction treatment: Review and recommendations for public policy. Health Policy, 97, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.013
(2009). The impact of human intuition in psychology. Review of General Psychology, 13, 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015104
(1987). Aggression replacement training. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
(*2011). The effectiveness of opioid maintenance treatment in prison settings: A systematic review. Addiction, 107, 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03676.x
(*2015). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of CBT informed anger management. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.09.011
(2009). The dynamics of deterrence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 14230–14235. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905513106
(*2014). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of European drug treatment programs on reoffending. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20, 584–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.804921
(2002). Beyond correctional quackery: Professionalism and the possibility of effective treatment. Federal Probation, 66, 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986211432203
(2016). Summary of findings from the national evaluation of the Honest Opportunity with Probation Enforcement Demonstration Field Experiment: The HOPE DFE evaluation. Retrieved from http://justicecenter.psu.edu/research/projects/files/HOPE%20DFE%20Findings%20Summary%202016%2009%2007.pdf
(2009). The primary factors that characterise effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic review. Victims and Offenders, 4, 124–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880802612573
(2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112833
(2016). Community protection policies and repeat sexual offending. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60, 1140–1158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15573946
(2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective interventions. Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 575–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00388.x
(2017). “I hate those little turds!” Science, entertainment and the enduring popularity of Scared Straight programs. Deviant Behavior, 38. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1190619
(2007). An experimental study of a therapeutic boot camp: Impact on impulses, attitudes and recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3, 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-007-9027-z
(2015). Preventing future offending of delinquents and offenders: What have we learned from experiments and meta-analyses? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10, 565–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-015-9244-9
(1994). Multisite evaluation of shock incarceration: Executive Summary. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.
(*2014). A systematic review of studies examining the effectiveness of therapeutic communities. Therapeutic Communities: The International Journal for Therapeutic Communities, 35, 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/TC-07-2013-0024
(2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: APA Books.
(2003). Cures that harm: Unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716202250781
(2011). The behavior change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behavior change interventions. Implementation Science, 6, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
(2015). Effectiveness of interventions for convicted DUI offenders in reducing recidivism: A systematic review of the peer-reviewed scientific literature. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 41, 16–29. https://doi.org/10.3109/00952990.2014.966199
(2016). Justice Data Lab analysis: Reoffending behavior after participation in Norfolk and Suffolk’s 180° scheme. Justice Data Lab Statistics: September 2016. London, UK: Ministry of Justice.
. (*2016). A rapid systematic review of what we know about alcohol use disorders and brief interventions in the criminal justice system. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 12, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-08-2015-0024
(2008). Offender coercion in treatment: A meta-analysis of effectiveness. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1109–1135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808320169
(*2015a). Pharmacological interventions for drug-using offenders (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015, 1–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010862.pub2
(*2015b). Interventions for drug-using offenders with co-occurring mental illness (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015, 1–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010901.pub2
(*2015). Interventions for female drug-using offenders (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015, 1–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010910.pub2
(2013). Scared Straight and other juvenile awareness programs for preventing juvenile delinquency: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2013(5), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2013.5
(*2013). The Andrews’ principles of risk, needs, and responsivity as applied in drug treatment programs: Meta-analysis of crime and drug use outcomes. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9, 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-013-9178-z
(1995). What is motivational interviewing? Behavioral and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135246580001643X
(*2013). The impact psychological therapies on violent behavior in clinical and forensic settings: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 761–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2013.09.001
(2015). The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: An international meta-analysis of sounds quality evaluations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 597–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-015-9241-z
(2012). What does not work or increases offending: A review of systematic or meta-analyses reviews: A rapid evidence assessment. Unpublished manuscript.
(1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
(*2014). Effectiveness of correctional programs with ethnically diverse offenders: A meta-analytic study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X12469507
(*2015). A systematic review of motivational approaches as a pre-intervention for domestic violence perpetrator programs. Retrieved from http://www.college.police.uk/News/College-news/Documents/Motivational_intervewing.pdf
(*2015). The impact of domestic violence perpetrator programs on victim and criminal justice outcomes: A systematic review of reviews (SRR) of research evidence. Retrieved from: http://www.college.police.uk/News/College-news/Documents/Perpetrator_programs.pdf
(1995). Cognitive distortions and affective deficits in sex offenders: A cognitive deconstructionist interpretation. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906329500700107
(*2014). When crime prevention harms: A review of systematic reviews. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10, 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9199-2
(*2014). Can Antisocial Personality Disorder be treated? A meta-analysis examining the effectiveness of treatment in reducing recidivism for individuals diagnosed with ASPD. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13, 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.890682
(2011). Redirect: The surprising new science of psychological interventions. London, UK: Penguin.
(2006). Good intentions meet hard realities: An evaluation of the Project Greenlight re-entry program. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 303–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00380.x
(2015). Intuition is not evidence: Prescriptions for behavioral interventions from social psychology. Behavioral Science & Policy, 1, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1036
(