Is Openness to Experience an Independent Personality Dimension?
Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Openness Domain and its NEO-PI-R Facets
Abstract
Abstract. The Openness to Experience personality dimension has been challenged for its lack of independence from other personality constructs. In order to test whether Openness is an independent trait, we applied the following psychometric tests to a sample of 1006 nonpsychology university students: NEO-PI-R, EPQ-RS, ZKPQ-III-R, and SSS-V. Results suggest that most of the Openness variance remains to be explained. Therefore, this domain can be considered independent within the personality area, although Extraversion and, above all, Sensation Seeking presented significant relationships with the Openness scales. Each NEO-PI-R Openness facet shows a different pattern of relationships with other personality constructs proposed by the Five-Factor, Eysenck's, and Zuckerman's theories. Those relationships are discussed.
References
(2002). A comparative study of Zuckerman's three structural models for personality through the NEO-PI-R, ZKPQ-III-R, EPQ-RS and Goldberg's 50-bipolar adjectives. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 713–725
(2003). Relationships between extraversion, openness to experience, and sensation seeking. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 671–680
(2004). Replicability of the three, four, and five Zuckerman's personality super-factors: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the EPQ-RS, ZKPQ and NEO-PI-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1093–1108
(2000). Fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, and openness/intellect factor. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 198–207
(1987). Intelligence: Its structure, growth, and action. Amsterdam: North-Holland
(1992a). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 653–665
(1992b). NEO-PI-R. Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc
(1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667–673
(1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum Press
(1997). Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-R) and short scale (EPQ-RS). Madrid: TEA Ediciones
(1992). Personality-intelligence relations: Assessing typical intellectual engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 537–552
(1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42
(1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265
(1985). Comparison of EPI and Psychoticism scales with measures of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 587–597
(1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford
(1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583
(1986). Fiabilidad y validez de la versión española de la Escala de Búsqueda de Sensaciones (forma V). [Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Sensation Seeking scale (form V)] Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 18, 7–22
(2002). La estructura de los rasgos de personalidad en adolescentes: El Modelo de Cinco Factores y los cinco alternativos. [The structure of personality traits in adolescents: The Five-Factor Model and the alternative five] Psicothema, 14, 134–143
(1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60, 225–251 (Reprinted from USAF ASD Tech. Rep. No. 61-97, 1961, Lackland Air Force Base, TX: U. S. Air Force)
(1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
(1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. New York: Cambridge University Press
(1993). A comparison of three structural models of personality: The big three, the big five, and the alternative five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757–768