Abstract
Abstract. In this exploratory study, a group of subjects was asked to come up with visible and quantifiable behaviors tied to certain person-descriptive adjectives. Another group of subjects then rated how much different levels of the behaviors would justify the use of each adjective to describe a person, as a cross-validation. The reliability of these ratings was excellent. Associations between adjectives and “their” behaviors were very strong and largely specific. The shapes of associations were usually linear or negatively accelerated, which is highly relevant for the formal modeling of person perception processes. Researchers aiming to measure personality in terms of behavior should make more systematic use of the knowledge that competent users of the natural language already share in this regard.
References
(2009). Five-factor inventories have a major general factor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.013
(1986). Toward an understanding of trait interrelations: Acts as instances for several traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.371
(2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.599
(1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments (2nd ed.). Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
(1983). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90, 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.2.105
(1993). Shared meaning and the convergence among observers’ personality descriptions. Journal of Personality, 61, 553–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00782.x
(2000). Verhalten
[Behavior] . Spektrum, Lexikon der Psychologie. Retrieved from http://www.spektrum.de/lexikon/psychologie/verhalten/16243(1991). Global traits: A neo-Allportian approach to personality. Psychological Science, 2, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00093.x
(1981).
Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons . In L. WheelerEd., Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141–165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.(1986). Category breadth and hierarchical structure in personality: Studies of asymmetries in judgments of trait implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.37
(1988). The lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research. European Journal of Personality, 2, 171–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410020302
(1991). A general model of consensus and accuracy in interpersonal perception. Psychological review, 98, 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.155
(1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2004). PERSON: A general model of interpersonal perception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_3
(1926). Die Grundlagen der Charakterkunde
[The science of character] . Leipzig, Germany: Johann Ambrosius Barth.(2011).
Person perception, dispositional inferences and social judgment . In L. M. HorowitzS. StrackEds., Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 157–170). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.(2014). What types of terms do people use when describing an individual’s personality? Psychological Science, 25, 1787–1794. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614541285
(2015). A model of “substance” and “evaluation” in person judgments. Journal of Research in Personality, 57, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2015.04.002
(1998). Identifying causes of disagreement between self‐reports and spouse ratings of personality. Journal of Personality, 66, 285–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00013
