Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Research Article

Heritability of Justice Sensitivity

Published Online:January 27, 2022https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000366

Abstract

Abstract. Justice is one of the fundamental principles in human evolution, and justice sensitivity from the pro-self (e.g., as a victim) and the prosocial perspective (e.g., as an observer, beneficiary, and perpetrator) matters in mental wellness and social interaction. However, the extent to which individual difference in justice sensitivity is influenced by genetic versus environmental factors remains unclear. Using a sample with 244 twin pairs, the present research attempts to determine the extent to which genetic factors play a role in the inter-individual difference of justice sensitivity as well as whether different facets of justice sensitivity, namely, pro-self and prosocial perspectives, share a common genetic basis. Results showed that (1) all facets of justice sensitivity were moderately heritable (21–33%) and that the non-shared environmental factors plus measurement error accounted for the rest of the variations (67–79%); (2) associations between the prosocial facets of justice sensitivity were driven by common genetic (rg = .50–.65) and non-shared environmental (plus measurement error; re = .24–.65) influences, whereas no significant genetic link was found between the pro-self and prosocial facets. The current findings provide novel evidence that sensitivity to injustice, especially to others’ suffering, is fundamentally grounded upon genetic origin, thereby shedding light on the nature and nurture aspects of justice behavior.

References

  • Akaike, H. (1987). Factor-analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294359 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baumert, A., Beierlein, C., Schmitt, M., Kemper, C. J., Kovaleva, A., Liebig, S., & Rammstedt, B. (2014). Measuring four perspectives of justice sensitivity with two items each. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(3), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.836526 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baumert, A., & Schmitt, M. (2016). Justice sensitivity. In C. SabbaghM. SchmittEds., Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 161–180). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bi, D., Li, X., Chen, J., Jiang, N., & Zhang, J. (2019). The Beijing Twin Study (BeTwiSt): An update. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 22(6), 486–491. https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2019.52 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124189017003004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bondü, R., & Elsner, B. (2015). Justice sensitivity in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 24(2), 420–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12098 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bondü, R., & Inerle, S. (2020). Afraid of injustice? Justice sensitivity is linked to general anxiety and social phobia symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders, 272, 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.167 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bondü, R., Sahyazici-Knaak, F., & Esser, G. (2017). Long-term associations of justice sensitivity, rejection sensitivity, and depressive symptoms in children and adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1446. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01446 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brosnan, S. F. (2006). Nonhuman species’ reactions to inequity and their implications for fairness. Social Justice Research, 19(2), 153–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022136 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brosnan, S. F., & De Waal, F. B. (2003). Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature, 425(6955), 297–299. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01963 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Buckholtz, J. W., & Marois, R. (2012). The roots of modern justice: cognitive and neural foundations of social norms and their enforcement. Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 655–661. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3087 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cai, H., Luo, Y. L., Shi, Y., Liu, Y., & Yang, Z. (2016). Male = science, female = humanities: Both implicit and explicit gender-science stereotypes are heritable. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(5), 412–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615627367 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Wallace, B. (2008). Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(10), 3721–3726. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710069105 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Champely, S. (2018). pwr: Basic functions for power analysis (Version 1.2–2) [Computer Software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pwr/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, J., Li, X., Zhang, J., Natsuaki, M. N., Leve, L. D., Harold, G. T., Chen, Z., Yang, X., Guo, F., Zhang, J., & Ge, X. (2013). The Beijing Twin Study (BeTwiSt): A longitudinal study of child and adolescent development. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16(1), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2012.115 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ebstein, R. P., Israel, S., Chew, S. H., Zhong, S., & Knafo, A. (2010). Genetics of human social behavior. Neuron, 65(6), 831–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.020 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gollwitzer, M., Rothmund, T., Pfeiffer, A., & Ensenbach, C. (2009). Why and when justice sensitivity leads to pro- and antisocial behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 999–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.07.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gollwitzer, M., Schmitt, M., Schalke, R., Maes, J., & Baer, A. (2005). Asymmetrical effects of justice sensitivity perspectives on prosocial and antisocial behavior. Social Justice Research, 18(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-005-7368-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450(7169), 557–559. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06288 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hanscombe, K. B., Haworth, C. M., Davis, O. S., Jaffee, S. R., & Plomin, R. (2010). The nature (and nurture) of children’s perceptions of family chaos. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 549–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.06.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Janoff-Bulman, R., Carnes, N. C., & Sheikh, S. (2014). Parenting and politics: Exploring early moral bases of political orientation. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2, 43–60. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v2i1.243 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kandler, C., Bell, E., & Riemann, R. (2016). The structure and sources of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. European Journal of Personality, 30(4), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2061 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kandler, C., Richter, J., & Zapko-Willmes, A. (2019). The nature and nurture of HEXACO personality trait differences. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 227(3), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000378 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Software review: Software programs for structural equation modeling: Amos, EQS, and LISREL. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 16(4), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428299801600407 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Li, J., Wang, W., Yu, J., & Zhu, L. (2016). Young children’s development of fairness preference. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1274. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01274 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lis, S., Schaedler, A., Liebke, L., Hauschild, S., Thome, J., Schmahl, C., Stahlberg, D., Kleindienst, N., & Bohus, M. (2018). Borderline personality disorder features and sensitivity to injustice. Journal of Personality Disorders, 32(2), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2017_31_292 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Loehlin, J. C. (1996). The Cholesky approach: A cautionary note. Behavior Genetics, 26(1), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02361160 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Luo, Y. L., Sedikides, C., & Cai, H. (2020). On the etiology of self-enhancement and its association with psychological wellbeing. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 435–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877410 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Maltese, S., Baumert, A., Reis, D., MacLeod, C., Tan-Mansukhani, R., Galang, A. J. R., Salanga, M. G. C., & Schmitt, M. (2020). A cross-cultural study of sensitivity to injustice and its consequences for cooperation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(7), 899–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619896895 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mikula, G., Petri, B., & Tanzer, N. (1990). What people regard as unjust: Types and structures of everyday experiences of injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20(2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420200205 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Olson, J. M., Vernon, P. A., Harris, J. A., & Jang, K. L. (2001). The heritability of attitudes: A study of twins. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 845–860. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.845 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., Knopik, V. S., & Neiderhiser, J. (2013). Behavioral genetics (6th ed.). Worth. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Purcell, S. (2002). Variance components models for gene-environment interaction in twin analysis. Twin Research, 5(6), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1375/136905202762342026 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Raftery, A. E. (1993). Bayesian model selection in structural equation models. In K. A. BollenJ. S. LongEds., Testing structural equation models (pp. 163–180). Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/271063 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. (1996). Individual differences in sensitivity to befallen injustice (SBI). Personality and Individual Differences, 21(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00028-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmitt, M., Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Maes, J. (2010). The justice sensitivity inventory: Factorial validity, location in the personality facet space, demographic pattern, and normative data. Social Justice Research, 23(2–3), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0115-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Maes, J., & Arbach, D. (2005). Justice sensitivity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21(3), 202–211. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.3.202 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. J., & Mohiyeddini, C. (1996). Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real-life disadvantage. Social Justice Research, 9(3), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197249 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. J., Neumann, R., & Montada, L. (1995). Dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice. Social Justice Research, 8(4), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334713 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thomas, N., Baumert, A., & Schmitt, M. (2011). Justice sensitivity as a risk and protective factor in social conflicts. In E. KalsJ. MaesEds., Justice and conflicts (pp. 107–120). Springer. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Verhulst, B. (2017). A power calculator for the classical twin design. Behavior Genetics, 47(2), 255–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-016-9828-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Verhulst, B., Eaves, L. J., & Hatemi, P. K. (2012). Correlation not causation: The relationship between personality traits and political ideologies. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00568.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wallace, B., Cesarini, D., Lichtenstein, P., & Johannesson, M. (2007). Heritability of ultimatum game responder behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(40), 15631–15634. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706642104 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wang, Y., Zheng, D., Chen, J., Rao, L.-L., Li, S., & Zhou, Y. (2019). Born for fairness: Evidence of genetic contribution to a neural basis of fairness intuition. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 14(5), 539–548. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsz031 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science, 311(5765), 1301–1303. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121448 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wu, M. S. (2014, June 19–22). Feeling failures of moral motivation: Behavior activation versus inhibition and two classes of justice sensitivity. Paper presented at the 15th Biennial Conference of The International Society for Justice Research, New York, NY. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wu, M. S., Schmitt, M., Zhou, C., Nartova-Bochaver, S., Astanina, N., Khachatryan, N., & Han, B. X. (2014). Examining self-advantage in the suffering of others: Cross-cultural differences in beneficiary and observer justice sensitivity among Chinese, Germans, and Russians. Social Justice Research, 27(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0212-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wu, M. S., Wang, P. L., & Chen, Y. Y. (2019). Social class and prosocial justice sensitivity: The moderation effect of individualism (in Chinese). Chinese Social Psychological Review, 17(2), 204–214. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar