Distractor Eccentricity and its Effect on Selective Attention
Abstract
Abstract. Previous research has shown conflicting results regarding the effect of distractor eccentricity on selective attention. The present study examines the relationship between a distractor's retinal location and participants' response latencies to a target while holding constant the distribution of attention. In three experiments, the participants searched for a target among several distractors. The retinal location of the critical distractor was manipulated so that it was at either a central or a peripheral location. The results show that all else being equal, an incompatible distractor causes more interference at a peripheral location than at a central location. This distractor eccentricity effect suggests that the visual system can overcome the default bias in the distribution of attention that favors a central stimulus.
References
(1972). Eye movements. In D. Jameson & L.M. Hurvich (Eds.), Handbook of sensory physiology (Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 303-330). Berlin: Springer.
(2005). Look here but ignore what you see: Effects of distractor at fixation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 592– 607
(1979). Human color vision. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
(1973). Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Research, 13, 762– 782
(1995). The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 1241– 1261
(2006). Attention speeds processing across eccentricity: Feature and conjunction searches. Vision Research, 46, 2028– 2040
(2003). The speed of visual information processing increases with eccentricity. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 699– 700
(1998). Spatial selection via feature-driven inhibition. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 727– 746
(1993). A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature, 363, 345– 347
(2000). An object-based cost of visual filtering. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 482– 495
(2003). Attentional focus, processing load, and Stroop interference. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 888– 900
(2006). Reinstating object-based attention under positional certainty: The importance of subjective parsing. Perception and Psychophysics, 68, 992– 1003
(2007). Distractor interference stays constant despite variation in working memory load. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 306– 312
(1984). The representation of the visual field in parvocellular and magnocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus in the macaque monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 226, 544– 564
(1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143– 149
(1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception and Psychophysics, 40, 225– 240
(1991). Limits in pattern discrimination: Central and peripheral factors. In J.R. Cronly-Dillon (Eds), Vision and visual dysfunction (pp. 266-275). Basingstoke, England: Macmillan.
(1981). Retinal location and its effect on the processing of target and distractor information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1247– 1257
(1999). Retinal location and its effect on the spatial distribution of visual attention. The American Journal of Psychology, 112, 187– 214
(1979). The peripheral critical flicker frequency. Vision Research, 19, 1019– 1023
(1994). MacProbe: A Macintosh-based experimenter's workstation for the cognitive sciences. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 26, 345– 351
(1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J.B. Long & A.D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1995). Tradeoffs between attentional effects of spatial cues and abrupt onsets. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 332– 342
(1983). The cost of visual filtering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 510– 522
(1978). Mechanisms of attention. In E.C. Carterette & P. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception (Vol. 9, pp. 3-47). New York: Academic Press.
(1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 267– 284
(1991). Reducing the effects of adjacent distractors by narrowing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 65– 76
(2005). Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 75– 82
(2004). Attentional selection of a peripheral ring overrules the central attentional bias. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 743– 751
(1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(1987). The role of attention in the preparation of visually guided saccadic eye movements in man. In J.K. O'Regan & A. Levy-Schoen (Eds.), Eye movements: From physiology to cognition(pp. 37-45). New York: North-Holland.
(1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science, 229, 782– 784
(1973). Speed-accuracy trade-off in recognition memory. Science, 181, 574– 576
(1973). The vertebrate retina: Principles of structure and function. San Francisco: Freeman.
(1979). An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor. Experimental Brain Research, 37, 495– 510
(1998). Signal timing across the macaque visual system. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 3272– 3278
(1979). Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor. Experimental Brain Research, 37, 1– 16
(1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67– 85
(1998). Why are there eccentricity effects in visual search? Visual and attentional hypotheses?. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 140– 156
