A Comparison of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Target and Distractor Presentation in the Remote Distractor Paradigm
Abstract
The remote distractor effect (RDE) is a robust finding of an increase in saccade onset latencies (20–40 ms) when a distractor is presented simultaneously with a target, compared to when a target is presented on its own (Walker, Deubel, Schneider, & Findlay, 1997). Distractors presented at fixation produce the largest RDE and the effect decreases as distractors are moved into the periphery. Data from two experiments that contrast with these standard findings are reported. Under bilateral target presentation, larger RDE magnitudes occurred for peripheral than for central distractors, whereas under unilateral presentation, the pattern reversed. The findings are discussed with reference to discrimination processes, attentional factors and current models of oculomotor control. It is suggested that in bilateral target presentation the competition between the distractor and the target results in the programming of a saccade to the distractor, as well as a saccade to the target. Time taken to cancel the saccade to the distractor produces the increased saccade latency for peripheral distractors in that condition.
References
(1998). Comparison of the discharge characteristics of brainstem omnipause neurons and superior colliculus fixation neurons in monkey: Implications for control of fixation and saccade behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 511–528.
(1982). Global processing for saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 22, 1033–1045.
(1999). A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 661–674.
(2002). Programming of exogenous and endogenous saccades: Evidence for a competitive integration model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1039–1054.
(1998). The role of frontal eye field in countermanding saccades: Visual, movement and fixation activity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 817–834.
(1969). Determination et latence de la response oculomotrice a deux stimulus [
Determination and latency of the response for two oculomotor stimuli ]. L’Annee Psychologie, 74, 43–66.(2005). The remote distractor effect of saccade latencies in fixation-offset and overlap conditions. Vision Research, 45, 2773–2779.
(1974). On oculomotor programming and perception. Brain Research, 71, 443–450.
(2005). The remote distractor effect in saccade programming: Channel interactions and lateral inhibition. Vision Research, 45, 1177–190.
(2002). Commentary: Saccadic eye movements: Overview of neural circuitry. In , The brain’s eye: Neurobiological and clinical aspects of oculomotor research (Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 140, pp. 89–96). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
(1998). Lateral inhibitory interactions in the intermediate layers of the monkey superior colliculus. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 1193–1209.
(1999). Lateral interactions in the superior colliculus, not an extended fixation zone, can account for the remote distractor effect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 694–695.
(1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446–461.
(1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science, 9, 379–385.
(1999). Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1595–1608.
(2001). A model of saccade initiation based on the competitive integration of exogenous and endogenous signals in the superior colliculus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 256–271.
(1997). Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: Evidence for an extended fixation zone. Journal of Neurophysiology, 78, 1108–1119.
(1995). Independent contributions of the orienting of attention, fixation offset and bilateral stimulation on human saccadic latencies. Experimental Brain Research, 103, 294–310.
(2000). The oculomotor distractor effect in normal and hemianopic vision. Proceedings Royal Society, 267B, 431–438.
(1994). Differential effects of nontarget stimuli on the occurrence of express saccades in man. Vision Research, 34, 1883–1891.
(1991). Express saccades: Is there a separate population in humans? Experimental Brain Research, 87, 218–222.
(2005). Effects of structured nontarget stimuli on saccadic latency. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 3214–3223.
