Abstract
Embodied theories of language processing suggest that this motor simulation is an automatic and necessary component of meaning representation. If this is the case, then language and action systems should be mutually dependent (i.e., motor activity should selectively modulate processing of words with an action-semantic component). In this paper, we investigate in two experiments whether evidence for mutual dependence can be found using a motor priming paradigm. Specifically, participants performed either an intentional or a passive motor task while processing words denoting manipulable and nonmanipulable objects. The performance rates (Experiment 1) and response latencies (Experiment 2) in a lexical-decision task reveal that participants performing an intentional action were positively affected in the processing of words denoting manipulable objects as compared to nonmanipulable objects. This was not the case if participants performed a secondary passive motor action (Experiment 1) or did not perform a secondary motor task (Experiment 2). The results go beyond previous research showing that language processes involve motor systems to demonstrate that the execution of motor actions has a selective effect on the semantic processing of words. We suggest that intentional actions activate specific parts of the neural motor system, which are also engaged for lexical-semantic processing of action-related words and discuss the beneficial versus inhibitory nature of this relationship. The results provide new insights into the embodiment of language and the bidirectionality of effects between language and action processing.
References
2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 1–21.
(2007). Grounding object concepts in perception and action: Evidence from fMRI studies of tools. Cortex, 43, 461–468.
(2005). Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 361–373.
(2006). Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 msec of processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(10), 1607–1615.
(2008). Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. Cognition, 106, 27–58.
(2005). Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioral study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 355–363.
(2006). Neural substrates of knowledge of hand postures for object grasping and functional object use: Evidence from fMRI. Brain Research, 1117, 175–185.
(2008). The different neural correlates of action and functional knowledge in semantic memory: An fMRI Study. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 740–751.
(1999). Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2(10), 913–919.
(2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage, 12, 478–484.
(2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558–565.
(2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307.
(2006). The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research, 174, 221–228.
(2003). Actions speak louder than functions: The importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(1), 30–46.
(2004). Organization of action sequences and the role of the pre-SMA. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 978–993.
(2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology – Paris, 102, 59–70.
(2008). Language-based access to gestural components of conceptual knowledge. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 869–882.
(1999). Brain structures related to active and passive finger movements in man. Brain, 122, 1989–1997.
(2006). Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: Manipulation knowledge of objects. Cognition, 98, 223–243.
(1993). The frontal lobes and voluntary action (pp. 38–103). Oxford: Oxford Science.
(2001). Brain reflections of words and their meaning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(12), 517–524.
(2005). Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 793–797.
(2005). Brain signatures of meaning access in action word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(6), 884–892.
(2007). Comprehending prehending: Neural correlates of processing verbs with motor stems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(5), 855–865.
(in press ). The function of words: Distinct neural correlates for words denoting differently manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.2006). The impact of semantic reference on word class: An fMRI study of action and object naming. NeuroImage, 32, 1865–1878.
(2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(2), 273–281.
(2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 1–11.
(