On the Decay of Distractor-Response Episodes
Abstract
Distractor-to-distractor repetition effects can be explained by retrieval and/or inhibitory processes. Interestingly, the two accounts predict different effects from repeated distractors: Inhibition theories always predict benefits, whereas stimulus-response-retrieval theories predict an interaction of response repetition and distractor repetitions, resulting in benefits with response repetitions and costs with response changes. In the present experiment the time-course and the temporal separability of a stimulus-response episode on distractor-to-distractor repetitions were analyzed. The results showed that the interaction of response repetition and distractor repetitions was affected by a simple decay function. In addition, distractor repetition effects were affected by the temporal separability. In concert, the data yield evidence for retrieval-based explanations of distractor-to-distractor repetitions.
References
(1999). The time-course of negative priming: Little evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 27, 575–583.
(1979). Facilitation in naming and categorizing repeated pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 449–459.
(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
(1978). The changing pattern of perceptual analytic strategies and response selection with practice in a two-choice reaction time task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 417–427.
(1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 145–173.
(2009). On the time-course of masked negative priming. Experimental Psychology, 56, 301–306.
(2007). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1367–1377.
(2007). On distractor repetition benefits in the negative-priming paradigm. Visual Cognition, 15, 166–178.
(1991). Age and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 163–169.
(1996). On the time course of negative priming: Another look. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 231–237.
(1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216.
(2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500.
(1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In , Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53–112). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
(1996). Inhibition and interference in selective attention: Some tests of a neural network model. Visual Cognition, 3, 119–164.
(1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.
(2006). Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 932–943.
(2007). Mechanisms of transfer-inappropriate processing. In , Inhibition in cognition (pp. 63–78). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
(1998). Transfer-inappropriate processing: Negative priming and related phenomena. In , The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, Vol. 39, (pp. 1–44). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
(1992). Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 565–576.
(1992). Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 993–1000.
(1987). Selective attention and the suppression of cognitive noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 327–334.
(1991). Costs and benefits of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1136–1145.
(2006). Sustained suppression in congruency tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 178–189.
(2001). Sequential analysis of a Simon task – evidence for an attention-shift account. Psychological Research, 65, 170–184.
(2009). Influence of mapping complexity on negative priming for incompatible spatial mappings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 1118–1123.
(2002). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66, 312–323.
(2005). Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 482–495.
(1968). Repetition effect and short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 435–439.
(1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 37, 591–611.
(1991). Inhibitory mechanisms of attention in identification and localization tasks: Time course and disruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 681–692.
(1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
