Abstract
Women remember more female than male faces, whereas men do not seem to display an own-gender bias in face recognition memory. Why women remember female faces to a greater extent than male faces is unclear; one proposition is that women attend more to and thereby process female faces more effortfully than male faces during encoding. A manipulation that distracts attention and reduces effortful processing may therefore decrease women’s own-gender bias by reducing memory for female faces relative to male faces. In three separate experiments, women and men encoded female and male faces for later recognition in full attention and divided attention conditions. Results consistently showed that women, in contrast to men, displayed a reliable own-gender bias. Importantly, the magnitude of women’s own-gender bias was not reduced in divided attention conditions, indicating that it is not a result of effortful processing of female faces. We suggest these results reflect that women have greater perceptual expertise for female faces, facilitating recognition memory.
References
(2009). A pox on the mind: Disjunction of attention and memory in the processing of physical disfigurement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 478–485.
(2009). Effect sizes for continuous data. In , The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 221–235). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
(2003). Remembering or knowing others? Person recognition and recollective experience. Memory, 11, 89–100.
(1989). The effects of sex of subject, sex and attractiveness of photo on facial recognition. Social Behavior and Personality, 17, 193–197.
(2003). The effects of aging and divided attention on memory for item and associative information. Psychology and Aging, 18, 873–885.
(1971). Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 393–396.
(1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107–117.
(1973). The effects of age and sex upon adolescents’ recognition of faces. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 123, 173–174.
(1976). Children’s ability to recognize other children’s faces. Child Development, 47, 506–510.
(2008). An inner face advantage in children’s recognition of familiar peers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101, 124–136.
(1974). Effects of uniqueness, sex of subject, and sex of photograph on facial recognition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 109–110.
(1997). Gender differences in episodic memory. Memory & Cognition, 25, 801–811.
(2008). Sex differences in episodic memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 52–56.
(2002). Sex differences in episodic memory: The influence of intelligence. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 107–114.
(1995). Predicting memory performance in optimally healthy very old adults. Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 1, 57–67.
(2010). Gender differences in brain activation during encoding and recognition of male and female faces. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 4, 55–67.
(1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513–541.
(2005). Looking for foes and friends: Perceptual and emotional factors when finding a face in the crowd. Emotion, 5, 379–395.
(1980). Is conscious attention necessary for long-term storage?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 379–390.
(1997). Developmental sex differences in verbal learning. Neuropsychology, 11, 577–584.
(2002). Sex differences in face recognition – Women’s faces make the difference. Brain and Cognition, 50, 121–128.
(1998). Karolinska directed emotional faces. Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska Institute and Hospital, Section of Psychology.
(1981). Sex differences in memory for faces. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 107, 109–125.
(1987). Sex differences, lateral reversal, and pose as factors in recognition memory for photographs of faces. Journal of General Psychology, 114, 13–37.
(1993). Gender differences in recognition memory for faces and cars: Evidence for the interest hypothesis. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 447–448.
(2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 3–35.
(2000). Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: Evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis. Memory & Cognition, 28, 965–976.
(1997). The Betula prospective Cohort study: Memory, health, and aging. Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition, 4, 1–32.
(1995). Functional aspects of recollective experience in face recognition. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 4, 387–398.
(1996). Comparing correlated but nonoverlapping correlations. Psychological Methods, 1, 178–183.
(2006). Infants’ differential processing of female and male faces. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 59–62.
(2005). Infant categorization of faces: Ladies first. Developmental Review, 25, 212–246.
(2006). Higher face recognition ability in girls: Magnified by own-sex and own-ethnicity bias. Memory, 14, 289–296.
(2007). Women remember more faces than men do. Acta Psychologica, 124, 344–355.
(1994). Role of attention in face encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 161–168.
(1983). Visual attention as a function of sex and apparel of stimulus object: Who looks at whom?. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 11, 11–15.
(2009). Combining estimates of effect size. In , The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 257–277). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
(2000). Social and cognitive factors affecting the own-race bias in whites. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 71–84.
(1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50.
(2001). Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 36–97.
(2002). Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 1–25.
(1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 671–703.
(1971). A test of three-dimensional spatial visualization based on the Shepard-Metzler “mental rotation” study. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado.
(2007). Gender differences in object location memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 23–38.
(1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.
(2003). An own gender bias and the importance of hair in face recognition. Acta Psychologica, 114, 101–114.
