How Emotions Modulate Arithmetic Performance
A Study in Arithmetic Problem Verification Tasks
Abstract
Abstract. The goal of the present study was to test whether and how emotions influence arithmetic performance. Participants had to verify arithmetic problems. True problems were either easier or harder problems. False problems were parity-match or parity-mismatch problems. The odd/even status of proposed and correct answers was the same in parity-match problems (e.g., 19 × 7 = 131) and different in parity-mismatch problems (e.g., 17 × 9 = 152). Before each problem, participants saw a positive (e.g., smiling baby), negative (e.g., mutilations), or neutral pictures (e.g., neutral face) selected from International Affective Picture System (IAPS). They had to decide whether each picture includes a person or not before verifying each arithmetic problem. Results showed different effects of emotion on true- and false problem verification. Participants’ performance on true problems showed decreased problem-difficulty after processing negative pictures and increased difficulty effects after processing positive pictures. On false problems, we found smaller parity-violation effects after negative pictures (i.e., decreased performance on parity-mismatch problems), together with larger parity-violation effects after positive pictures (i.e., decreased performance on parity-match problems). These findings suggest that emotions influence arithmetic performance via which strategy is used and how each strategy is executed on each problem. They have important implications for understanding the role of emotions on arithmetic performance, and more generally on how emotions influence cognition.
References
2018). Heuristics versus direct calculation, and age-related differences in multiplication: An evidence accumulation account of plausibility decisions in arithmetic. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 30, 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2017.1397676
(2001). The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.224
(2012).
(Higher cognition is altered by non-cognitive factors: How affect enhances and disrupts mathematics performance in adolescence and young adulthood . In V. F. ReynaS. B. ChapmanM. R. DoughertyJ. ConfreyEds., The adolescent brain: Learning, reasoning, and decision making (pp. 243–263). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13493-0092005). When high-powered people fail: Working memory and “choking under pressure” in math. Psychological Science, 16, 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00789
(2012). Reasoning about highly emotional topics: Syllogistic reasoning in a group of war veterans. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.603693
(2013). When emotions improve reasoning: The possible roles of relevance and utility. Thinking & Reasoning, 19, 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.791642
(2004). Reasoning about emotional and neutral materials. Is logic affected by emotion? Psychological Science, 15, 745–752. https://doi.org/10.1111.j.0956-7976.2004.0751
(2007). Reasoning about emotional contents following shocking terrorist attacks: A tale of three cities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.13.1.47
(2015). The chicken or the egg? The direction of the relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1987. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01987
(2014). Exogenous (automatic) attention to emotional stimuli: A review. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 1228–1258. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0270-2
(Cohen-Kadosh, R. C.Dowker, A. (Eds.). (2015). The Oxford handbook of numerical cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford Library of Psychology.
2010). Diagnosing and alleviating the impact of performance pressure on mathematical problem solving. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1619–1630. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903474286
(2016). Mathematics anxiety: What have we learned in 60 years? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00508
(2010). Emotion and memory narrowing: A review and goal-relevance approach. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 833–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902738863
(2017). An unpleasant emotional state reduces working memory capacity: Electrophysiological evidence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12, 984–992. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx030
(2018). An introduction to mathematical cognition. London, UK: Routledge.
(1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/749455
(2007). Anticipatory modulation of interference induced by unpleasant pictures. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 404–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930600625032
(2009). Anticipation selectively enhances interference exerted by pictures of negative valence. Experimental Psychology, 56, 228–235. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.228
(1986). Why 2 × 2 = 5 looks so wrong: On the odd–even rule in product verification. Memory & Cognition, 14, 141–149.
(1984). Why 2 + 2 = 5 looks so wrong: On the odd–even rule in sum verification. Memory & Cognition, 12, 171–180.
(2007).
(The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) in the study of emotion and attention . In J. A. CoanJ. J. B. AllenEds., Series in affective science. Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 29–46). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual (Technical Report A-8). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
(1995). When plausibility judgments supersede fact retrieval: The example of the odd-even effect on product verification. Memory & Cognition, 23, 34–48. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210555
(1999). What affects strategy selection in arithmetic? The example of parity and five effects on product verification. Memory & Cognition, 27, 364–382. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211420
(2000). The odd-even effect in multiplication: Parity rule or familiarity with even numbers? Memory & Cognition, 28, 358–365. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198551
(1972). The mathematics anxiety rating scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19, 551. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033456
(Robinson, M. D.Watkins, E. R.Harmon-Jones, E. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of cognition and emotion. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 383–388. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605198104
(2005). Attentional interference effects of emotional pictures: threat, negativity, or arousal? Emotion, 5, 55. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.55
(1997). Older and younger adults’ strategy choices in multiplication: Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 71. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.1.71
(2009). Effects of emotional valence and arousal upon memory trade-offs with aging. Psychology and Aging, 24, 412. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015526
(Xolocotzin, U. (Ed.). (2017). Understanding emotions in mathematical thinking and learning. London, UK: Academic Press.
2012). The neurodevelopmental basis of math anxiety. Psychological Science, 23, 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611429134
(