Skip to main content
Short Research Article

Be Responsible?

Priming “Responsibility” and the Bystander Effect in a Field Setting

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000513

Abstract. The bystander effect reveals that people are less likely to help a person in need when others are present. We examined the impact of priming the concept of responsibility on the bystander effect in a field study. Lone pedestrians (N = 259) were randomly assigned to a two (Bystanders: none and three nonresponsive bystanders) by two (Shirt: blank shirt and shirt with “Be Responsible” written on the front) design. A researcher dropped eight pens approximately 15 ft from a lone pedestrian, while wearing one of the two shirts in the presence/absence of bystanders (confederates). The bystander effect was found: Pedestrians helped pick up pens more frequently in the no bystanders condition (59.05% helped) compared to the nonresponsive bystanders condition (41.67% helped). The responsibility prime tended to boost helping rates, but it did not significantly increase helping rates either as a main effect or as part of an interaction term. The bystander effect was replicated in a field setting, but priming the concept of responsibility did not appear to reduce it.

References

  • Abbate, C. S., Ruggieri, S., & Boca, S. (2013). The effect of prosocial priming in the presence of bystanders. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(3), 619–622. 10.1080/00224545.2013.791658 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Aron, A., Coups, E. J., & Aron, E. N. (2013). Statistics for psychology (6th ed.). Pearson. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 230–244. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Batara, J. B. L., Franco, P. S., Quiachon, M. A. M., & Sembrero, D. R. M. (2016). Effects of religious priming concepts on prosocial behavior towards ingroup and outgroup. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 12(4), 635–644. 10.5964/ejop.v12i4.1170 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 396–403. 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Chabris, C. F., Heck, P. R., Mandart, J., Benjamin, D. J., & Simons, D. J. (2019). No evidence that experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth: Two failures to replicate. Social Psychology, 50(2), 127–132. 10.1027/1864-9335/a000361 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4, pt 1), 377–383. 10.1037/h0025589 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Doyen, S., Klein, O., Pichon, C.-L., & Cleeremans, A. (2012). Behavioral priming: It's all in the mind, but whose mind? PLoS ONE, 7(1), Article e29081. 10.1371/journal.pone.0029081 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 283–308. 10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Edwards, K. M., Banyard, V. L., Sessarego, S. N., Waterman, E. A., Mitchell, K. J., & Chang, H. (2019). Evaluation of a bystander-focused interpersonal violence prevention program with high school students. Prevention Science, 20(4), 488–498. 10.1007/s11121-019-01000-w First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Fischer, P., Krueger, J. I., Greitemeyer, T., Vogrincic, C., Kastenmüller, A., Frey, D., Heene, M., Wicher, M., & Kainbacher, M. (2011). The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 517–537. 10.1037/a0023304 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Garcia, S. M., Weaver, K., Moskowitz, G. B., & Darley, J. M. (2002). Crowded minds: The implicit bystander effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 843–853. 10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.843 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Garcia, S. M., Weaver, K., Darley, J. M., & Spence, B. T. (2009). Dual effects of implicit bystanders: Inhibiting vs. facilitating helping behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(2), 215–224. 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.02.013 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hortensius, R., & de Gelder, B. (2018). From empathy to apathy: The bystander effect revisited. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(4), 249–256. 10.1177/0963721417749653 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Katz, J., & Moore, J. (2013). Bystander education training for campus sexual assault prevention: An initial meta-analysis. Violence and Victims, 28(6), 1054–1067. 10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-12-00113 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10(3), 215–221. 10.1037/h0026570 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Markey, P. M. (2000). Bystander intervention in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(2), 183–188. 10.1016/s0747-5632(99)00056-4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Molden, D. C. (2014). Understanding priming effects in social psychology: What is “social priming” and how does it occur? Social Cognition, 32(suppl 1), 1–11. 10.1521/soco.2014.32.supp.1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Over, H., & Carpenter, M. (2009). Eighteen-month-old infants show increased helping following priming with affiliation. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1189–1193. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02419.x First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Payne, B. K., Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., & Loersch, C. (2016). Replicable effects of primes on human behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(10), 1269–1279. 10.1037/xge0000201 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Philpot, R., Liebst, L. S., Levine, M., Bernasco, W., & Lindegaard, M. R. (2020). Would I be helped? Cross-national CCTV footage shows that intervention is the norm in public conflicts. American Psychologist, 75(1), 66–75. 10.1037/amp0000469 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Plötner, M., Over, H., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2015). Young children show the bystander effect in helping situations. Psychological Science, 26(4), 499–506. 10.1177/0956797615569579 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Ross, A. S. (1971). Effect of increased responsibility on bystander intervention: The presence of children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19(3), 306–310. 10.1037/h0031459 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Siev, J., Zuckerman, S. E., & Siev, J. J. (2018). The relationship between immorality and cleansing: A meta-analysis of the Macbeth effect. Social Psychology, 49(5), 303–309. 10.1027/1864-9335/a000349 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Song, J., & Oh, I. (2018). Factors influencing bystanders' behavioral reactions in cyberbullying situations. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 273–282. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariant statistics (4th ed). Allyn & Bacon. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • van Bommel, M., van Prooijen, J.-W., Elffers, H., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2012). Be aware to care: Public self-awareness leads to a reversal of the bystander effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 926–930. 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar