Be Responsible?
Priming “Responsibility” and the Bystander Effect in a Field Setting
Abstract
Abstract. The bystander effect reveals that people are less likely to help a person in need when others are present. We examined the impact of priming the concept of responsibility on the bystander effect in a field study. Lone pedestrians (N = 259) were randomly assigned to a two (Bystanders: none and three nonresponsive bystanders) by two (Shirt: blank shirt and shirt with “Be Responsible” written on the front) design. A researcher dropped eight pens approximately 15 ft from a lone pedestrian, while wearing one of the two shirts in the presence/absence of bystanders (confederates). The bystander effect was found: Pedestrians helped pick up pens more frequently in the no bystanders condition (59.05% helped) compared to the nonresponsive bystanders condition (41.67% helped). The responsibility prime tended to boost helping rates, but it did not significantly increase helping rates either as a main effect or as part of an interaction term. The bystander effect was replicated in a field setting, but priming the concept of responsibility did not appear to reduce it.
References
2013). The effect of prosocial priming in the presence of bystanders. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(3), 619–622. 10.1080/00224545.2013.791658
(2013). Statistics for psychology (6th ed.). Pearson.
(1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 230–244. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230
(2016). Effects of religious priming concepts on prosocial behavior towards ingroup and outgroup. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 12(4), 635–644. 10.5964/ejop.v12i4.1170
(2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 396–403. 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x
(2019). No evidence that experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth: Two failures to replicate. Social Psychology, 50(2), 127–132. 10.1027/1864-9335/a000361
(1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4, pt 1), 377–383. 10.1037/h0025589
(2012). Behavioral priming: It's all in the mind, but whose mind? PLoS ONE, 7(1), Article e29081. 10.1371/journal.pone.0029081
(1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 283–308. 10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283
(2019). Evaluation of a bystander-focused interpersonal violence prevention program with high school students. Prevention Science, 20(4), 488–498. 10.1007/s11121-019-01000-w
(2011). The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 517–537. 10.1037/a0023304
(2002). Crowded minds: The implicit bystander effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 843–853. 10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.843
(2009). Dual effects of implicit bystanders: Inhibiting vs. facilitating helping behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(2), 215–224. 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.02.013
(2018). From empathy to apathy: The bystander effect revisited. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(4), 249–256. 10.1177/0963721417749653
(2013). Bystander education training for campus sexual assault prevention: An initial meta-analysis. Violence and Victims, 28(6), 1054–1067. 10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-12-00113
(1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10(3), 215–221. 10.1037/h0026570
(2000). Bystander intervention in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(2), 183–188. 10.1016/s0747-5632(99)00056-4
(2014). Understanding priming effects in social psychology: What is “social priming” and how does it occur? Social Cognition, 32(suppl 1), 1–11. 10.1521/soco.2014.32.supp.1
(2009). Eighteen-month-old infants show increased helping following priming with affiliation. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1189–1193. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02419.x
(2016). Replicable effects of primes on human behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(10), 1269–1279. 10.1037/xge0000201
(2020). Would I be helped? Cross-national CCTV footage shows that intervention is the norm in public conflicts. American Psychologist, 75(1), 66–75. 10.1037/amp0000469
(2015). Young children show the bystander effect in helping situations. Psychological Science, 26(4), 499–506. 10.1177/0956797615569579
(1971). Effect of increased responsibility on bystander intervention: The presence of children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19(3), 306–310. 10.1037/h0031459
(2018). The relationship between immorality and cleansing: A meta-analysis of the Macbeth effect. Social Psychology, 49(5), 303–309. 10.1027/1864-9335/a000349
(2018). Factors influencing bystanders' behavioral reactions in cyberbullying situations. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 273–282. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.008
(2001). Using multivariant statistics (4th ed). Allyn & Bacon.
(2012). Be aware to care: Public self-awareness leads to a reversal of the bystander effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 926–930. 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.011
(