Parasocial Interaction as More Than Friendship
Evidence for Parasocial Interactions With Disliked Media Figures
Abstract
This study supports the refinement of the concept of parasocial interaction (PSI) to apply to mediated personae that viewers might dislike. By contrast, traditional approaches have treated PSI as a sort of friendship with the mediated persona. Participants (N = 249) were randomly assigned to self-select a liked or disliked television persona. Various viewer reactions to that character were measured using two different measures of PSI. The data revealed that participants did experience PSI with disliked characters as well as liked characters, and that the two measures of PSI did not appear to assess the same construct. Implications for future research are discussed.
References
(1983). Interpersonal attraction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Random House.
(2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4, 245–264.
(2003). Parasocial breakups: Measuring individual differences in responses to the dissolution of parasocial relationships. Mass Communication and Society, 6, 191–202.
(1991). Psychological predictors of television viewing motivation. Communication Research, 18, 443–463.
(2008). The parasocial contact hypothesis: Implications for changing racial attitudes. Columbus, OH, USA: The Ohio State University, Unpublished master’s thesis.
(1992). Disagreeing about agreement: Reconciling differences about similarity. Communication Monographs, 59, 199–208.
(2006). When good Friends say goodbye: A parasocial breakup study. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 502–523.
(2003). Viewer aggression and homophily, identification, and parasocial relationships with television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 77–98.
(2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4, 279–305.
(2008). Parasocial interactions and paracommunication with new media characters. In , Mediated interpersonal communication (pp. 177–199). New York, NY: Routledge.
(2010, June). Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interactions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Singapore.
(1996). Children’s wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 389–402.
(1957). Interaction in audience-participation shows. American Journal of Sociology, 62, 579–587.
(1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry, 19, 215–229.
(2009). Nielsens: The Bachelor is dearly beloved. Retrieved February 1, 2010 from www.usatoday.com/life/television/news/2009-03-10-nielsen-analysis_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip
(2006). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In , Psychology of entertainment (pp. 291–313). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
(2006). Emotional and cognitive predictors of the enjoyment of reality-based and fictional television programming: An elaboration of the uses and gratifications perspective. Media Psychology, 8, 421–447.
(1975). Children in front of the small screen. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
(1996). The media equation: How people treat computers television, and new media like real people and places. Stanford, CA: Cambridge University Press.
(2008). Investigating the relationships among child’s age, parasocial interactions, and the social realism of favorite television characters. Communication Research Reports, 25, 145–154.
(1972). Mass media consumption as a functional alternative. In , Sociology of mass communications (pp. 166–194). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
(1976). Adolescents’ TV relations: Three scales. Communication Research, 3, 347–366.
(1987). Audience activity and soap opera involvement. Human Communication Research, 14, 246–268.
(1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12, 155–180.
(2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72, 92–115.
(2006). Can one TV show make a difference? Will & Grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 15–37.
(2008). The PSI-process scales: A new measure to assess the intensity and breadth of parasocial processes. Communications, 33, 385–401.
(2010). Testing a universal tool for measuring parasocial interactions cross different situations and media. Journal of Media Psychology, 22, 26–36.
(2009). The Jason Mesnick drama finally ends! The bachelor show finale and real life. Retrieved February 1, 2010 from www.examiner.com/x-260-Seattle-Parenting-Examiner~y2009m3d3-The-Jason-Mesnick-drama-finally-ends-The-Bachelor-Show-finale-and-real-life.
(2010). Parasocial interaction with liked, neutral, and disliked characters on a popular TV series. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 250–269.
(1996). Parasoziale Beziehungen zu Serenfiguren: Ergänzung oder Ersatz? [
Parasocial relationships to characters in TV series: Complement of substitution? ]. Medienpsychologie, 8, 202–216.
