Skip to main content
Original Article

Embodiment of Narrative Engagement

Connecting Self-Reported Narrative Engagement to Psychophysiological Measures

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000153

Abstract. This study investigated the validity of the narrative engagement scale (Busselle & Bilandzic, 2009) by grounding the dimensions of the scale in relationships between self-reported narrative engagement and embodied mental processes occurring during exposure. Psychophysiological measures were used to observe real-time variation in mental processes activated when individuals viewed narrative content that was manipulated in two fundamental content characteristics: cohesion and emotional content. The results of a 2 (low vs. high cohesion) × 2 (low vs. high emotional content) × 3 (video clips) mixed model repeated measures experiment showed consistent influences of cohesion and emotional content on self-reported narrative engagement as well as psychophysiological indicators (heart rate, skin conductance, corrugator activity). Confirming the hypotheses, self-reported attentional focus was related to lower levels of heart rate, while self-reported emotional engagement was positively related to corrugator activity. Both attentional focus and emotional engagement were related to increases of skin conductance levels over time. The results support the validity of the dimensional concept of narrative engagement and open further avenues for clarifying mechanisms of narrative persuasion.

References

  • Abbott, H. P. (2002). The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge: University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Andreassi, J. L. (2007). Psychophysiology: Human behavior and physiological response. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bailey, R., Wise, K. & Bolls, P. D. (2009). How avatar customizability affects children’s arousal and subjective presence during junk food–sponsored online video games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 277–283. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0292 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berger, C. R. & Lee, K. J. (2011). Second thoughts, second feelings: Attenuating the impact of threatening narratives through rational reappraisal. Communication Research, 38(1), 3–26. doi: 10.1177/0093650210377986 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bolls, P. D. (2010). Understanding emotion from a superordinate dimensional perspective: A productive way forward for communication processes and effects studies. Communication Monographs, 77(2), 146–152. doi: 10.1080/03637751003790477 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bolls, P. D., Wise, K. & Bradley, S. (2012). Embodied motivated cognition: A theoretical framework for studying dynamic mental processes underlying advertising exposure. In S. RodgersE. ThorsonEds., Advertising theory (pp. 105–119). New York: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Briner, S. W., Virtue, S. & Kurby, C. A. (2012). Processing causality in narrative events: Temporal order matters. Discourse Processes, 49(1), 61–77. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2011.607952 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Busselle, R. W. & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18, 255–280. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Busselle, R. W. & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12, 321–347. doi: 10.1080/15213260903287259 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • J. T. CacioppoL. G. TassinaryG. G. Berntson (2007). Handbook of psychophysiology. New York: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Calvo, M. G. & Lang, P. J. (2004). Gaze patterns when looking at emotional pictures: Motivationally biased attention. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 221–243. doi: 10.1023/B:MOEM.0000040153.26156.ed First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chatman, S. B. (1989). Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film (5th ed.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Collins, W. A., Wellman, H., Keniston, A. H. & Westby, S. D. (1978). Age-related aspects of comprehension and inference from a televised dramatic narrative. Child Development, 49(2), 389–399. doi: 10.2307/1128703 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M. & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 193–202. doi: 10.3758/BF03195564 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Green, M. C. & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hastall, M., Bilandzic, H. & Sukalla, F. (2013, June). Are there genre-specific moral lessons? A content analysis of norm violations depicted in four popular television genres. UK: Paper presented at the ICA Conference in London. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Houle, R. & Feldman, R. S. (1991). Emotional displays in children’s television programming. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15(4), 261–271. doi: 10.1007/BF00986925 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Igartua, J. J. & Barrios, I. (2012). Changing real-world beliefs with controversial movies: Processes and mechanisms of narrative persuasion. Journal of Communication, 62, 514–531. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01640.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jarvis, B. G. (2012a). DirectRT (Version 2012.4.0.145) [Computer software]. New York: Empirisoft Corporation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jarvis, B. G. (2012b). MediaLab (Version 2012.4.110) [Computer software]. New York: Empirisoft Corporation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Landreville, K. D. & LaMarre, H. L. (2011). Working through political entertainment: How negative emotion and narrative engagement encourage political discussion intent in young Americans. Communication Quarterly, 59, 200–220. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2011.563441 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, A. (2009). The limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing. In R. L. NabiM. B. OliverEds., The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 193–204). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, A. & Ewoldsen, D. R. (2010). Beyond effects: Conceptualizing communication as dynamic, complex, nonlinear, and fundamental. In S. AllanEd., Rethinking communication: Keywords in communication research (pp. 111–122). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, A., Park, B., Sanders-Jackson, A. N., Wilson, B. D. & Wang, Z. (2007). Cognition and emotion in TV-message processing: How valence, arousing content, structural complexity and information density affect the availability of cognitive resources. Media Psychology, 10, 317–338. doi: 10.1080/15213260701532880 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, A., Potter, R. F. & Bolls, P. (2009). Where psychophysiology meets the media. In J. BryantM. B. OliverEds., Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 185–206). New York: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, A. & Yegiyan, N. S. (2009). Motivated message processing: How media elicit motivation which influences how media are processed. In J. McCroskeyK. FloydM. BeattyEds., Biological dimensions of communication (pp. 135–159). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Linderholm, T., Everson, M. G., van den Broek, P., Mischinski, M., Crittenden, A. & Samuels, J. (2000). Effects of causal text revisions on more- and less-skilled readers’ comprehension of easy and difficult texts. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 525–556. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI1804_4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lowe, P. J. & Durkin, K. (1999). The effect of flashback on children’s understanding of television crime content. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43(1), 83–97. doi: 10.1080/08838159909364476 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C. & Louwerse, M. M. (2012). Sources of text difficulty: Across genres and grades. In J. P. SabatiniE. R. AlbroT. O’ReillyEds., Measuring up: Advances in how we assess reading ability (pp. 89–116). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nacke, L. E., Grimshaw, M. N. & Lindley, C. A. (2010). More than a feeling: Measurement of sonic user experience and psychophysiology in a first-person shooter game. Interacting With Computers, 22, 336–343. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pence, J. (2004). Narrative emotion: Feeling, form and function. Journal of Narrative Theory, 34, 273–276. doi: 10.1353/jnt.2005.0005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Plantinga, C. (2009). Moving viewers: American film and the spectator’s experience. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Potter, R. F. & Bolls, P. D. (2012). Psychophysiological measurement and meaning: Cognitive and emotional processing of media. New York: Routledge. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Quené, H. & van den Bergh, H. (2004). On multi-level modeling of data from repeated measures designs: A tutorial. Speech Communication, 43(1–2), 103–121. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2004.02.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Simons, R. F., Detenber, B. H., Cuthbert, B. N., Schwartz, D. D. & Reiss, J. E. (2003). Attention to television: Alpha power and its relationship to image motion and emotional content. Media Psychology, 5, 283–301. doi: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0503_03 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tijus, C., Levillain, F., Bessaa, H., Besson, V., Floucat, O., Fouquereau, N., … Wang, A. (2009). Immersive, emotive and cognitive effects of HDTV: Evaluating effects of image definition on presence. International Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies, 2009. RIVF ’09, , 1–4. doi: 10.1109/RIVF.2009.5174643 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Dijk, T. A. & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, Z., Solloway, T., Tchernev, J. M. & Barker, B. (2012). Dynamic motivational processing of antimarijuana messages: Coactivation begets attention. Human Communication Research, 38, 485–509. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01431.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weiss, A. J. & Wilson, B. J. (1996). Emotional portrayals in family television series that are popular among children. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40(1), 1–29. doi: 10.1080/08838159609364330 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C. & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6(5), 292–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00513.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zwarun, L. & Hall, A. (2012). Narrative persuasion, transportation, and the role of need for cognition in online viewing of fantastical films. Media Psychology, 15, 327–355. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2012.700592 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar