Between a Rock and a Hard Place
The Role of Moral Intuitions and Social Distance in Determining Moral Judgments of an Agent in a Moral Dilemma
Abstract
Abstract. Applying logic from both the model of intuitive morality and exemplars and construal level theory, we examined the impact of baseline moral intuition salience and social distance on the moral judgment of a narrative character confronted with a moral dilemma. After completing a measure of baseline intuition salience, participants in an experiment first read an article about a fighter pilot who shot down a plane and then judged the pilot’s actions as morally right or wrong. The article indicated that the plane had been hijacked by a terrorist who wanted to let it crash into a nearby stadium, and that the pilot shot down the plane to save the spectators in the stadium. Participants were randomly assigned to read the article either as if they were the pilot (social distance low) or as objectively as possible (social distance high). Results showed that baseline intuition salience and social distance interacted in determining moral judgment. Finally, moral judgment predicted whether participants would find the pilot guilty or not. In a second study using the same design as in the first study, we ensured that readers focused on different aspects of the dilemma depending on social distance.
References
(1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
(1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
(2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 610–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.610
. (2016, October 18). German TV Terror drama asks public to deliver verdict. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-37692662
(2015). Perceptions of moral violations and personality traits among heroes and villains. Mass Communication and Society, 18(2), 186–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2014.923462
(2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1204–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.012
(2009). When values matter: Expressing values in behavioral intentions for the near vs. distant future. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.023
(2012).
Morality and psychological distance: A construal level theory perspective . In M. MikulincerP. R. ShaverEds., The Herzliya series on personality and social psychology. The social psychology of morality. Exploring the causes of good and evil (1st ed., pp. 185–202). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13091-010(2015). Do as I say, don’t do as I do: Differences in moral judgments do not translate into differences in decisions in real-life trolley problems. Journal of Economic Psychology, 47, 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.01.001
(2012). Construal levels and moral judgment: Some complications. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(5), 628–638.
(2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
(2009). Dual-process morality and the personal/impersonal distinction: A reply to McGuire, Langdon, Coltheart, and Mackenzie. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 581–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.003
(2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
(2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3084564
(2006). The Moral Foundations Questionnaire. http://faculty.virginia.edu/haidtlab/mf.html
(2007).
The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culturespecific virtues, and perhaps even modules . In P. CarruthersS. LaurenceS. P. StichEds., Evolution and cognition. The innate mind (pp. 367–392). Oxford University Press.(in press).
Research on the model of intuitive morality and exemplars . In J. Van den BulckEd., The international encyclopedia of media psychology. Wiley-Blackwell.(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Methodology in the social sciences, The Guilford Press.
(2012). Thinking, fast and slow, Penguin Books.
(1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
(2013). What makes characters’ bad behaviors acceptable? The effects of character motivation and outcome on perceptions, character liking, and moral disengagement. Mass Communication and Society, 16(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2012.690926
(1998).
On the perception of social consensus . In M. P. ZannaEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 163–240). Academic Press.(2017). Proximity and terrorism news in social media: A construal-level theoretical approach to networked framing of terrorism in twitter. Mass Communication and Society, 20(6), 869–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1369545
(2015). Construal-level theory and intuitive morality: How processing states shape moral judgments of media content. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association (ICA), San Juan, PR.
(2014). Egoism versus altruism in television content for young audiences. Mass Communication and Society, 17(4), 597–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.816747
(2007). Social distance, framing, and judgment: A construal level perspective. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 489–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00309.x
(2013).
A model of intuitive morality and exemplars . In R. C. TamboriniEd., Electronic media research series. Media and the moral mind (pp. 43–74). Routledge.(2013). Predicting media appeal from instinctive moral values. Mass Communication and Society, 16(3), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2012.703285
(2016). Media’s influence on the accessibility of altruistic and egoistic motivations. Communication Research Reports, 33(3), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2016.1186627
(2020).
Advancing the model of intuitive morality exemplars . In K. FloydR. WeberEds., Communication science and biology. Routledge.(2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
(2014). Replication of experiments evaluating impact of psychological distance on moral judgment. Social Psychology, 45(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000188
(2000).
Basal morality in drama appreciation . In I. BondebjergEd., Moving images, culture, and the mind (pp. 53–63). University of Luton.(2002).
Exemplification theory of media influence . In J. BryantD. ZillmannEds., Media effects. Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 19–41). Erlbaum.
