Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Theoretical Article

An Explication of Identity Shift Theory

Getting Our Shift Together

Published Online:November 18, 2021https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000314

Abstract

Abstract. First articulated in 2008, the concept of identity shift refers to the process of self-transformation that is the result of intentional self-presentation in a mediated context. As research into identity shift has become increasingly prevalent, our understanding of the concept’s mechanisms and constraints has become more detailed and in depth. We now have a greater understanding of the process and limitations of identity shift: an understanding sufficient to begin articulating a theory of identity shift that explains and predicts the intrapersonal effects of mediated self-presentations. The present work advances such a theory. We begin by summarizing and synthesizing extant identity shift work – including published articles, presented manuscripts, and unpublished research – to better understand the identity shift process. We then use this synthesis to articulate an initial theory (identity shift theory; IST) that specifies the processes, conditions, constraints, and effects of identity shift based on personal, psychological, and communicative characteristics. Ultimately, the advancement of identity shift theory can inform future research and practice into the implications of online self-presentation for self-effects.

References

  • Anonymous. (1998). To reveal or not to reveal: A theoretical model of anonymous communication. Communication Theory, 8(4), 381–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00226.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. BerkowitzEd., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Campbell, J. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.3.538 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carr, C. T. (2021). Identity shift effects of personalization of self-presentation on extraversion. Media Psychology, 24(4), 490–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1753540 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carr, C. T. (2019, May). Identity shift effects of selective self-presentation on self-perception and subsequent behaviors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association Conference, Washington, DC. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carr, C. T., & Foreman, A. C. (2016). Identity shift III: Effects of publicness of feedback and relational closeness in computer-mediated communication. Media Psychology, 19(2), 334–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1049276 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carr, C. T., & Hayes, R. A. (2019). Identity shift effects of self-presentation and confirmatory & disconfirmatory feedback on self-perceptions of brand identification. Media Psychology, 22(3), 418–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1396228 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carr, C. T., Wohn, D. Y., & Hayes, R. A. (2016). as social support: Relational closeness, automaticity, and interpreting social support from paralinguistic digital affordances in social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.087 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Choi, S., Williams, D., & Kim, H. (in press). A snap of your true self: How self-presentation and temporal affordance influence self-concept on social media. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/444820977199 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cingel, D. P., Wartella, E., & Krcmar, M. (2014). The role of adolescent development in social networking site use: Theory and evidence. Journal of Youth Development, 9(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2014.70 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. Scribner. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self‐presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 855–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12078 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fox, J., & Vendemia, M. A. (2016). Selective self-presentation and social comparison through photographs on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(10), 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0248 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • French, M. R. (2018). Algorithmic mirrors: An examination of how personalized recommendations can shape self-perceptions and reinforce gender stereotypes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • French, M., & Hancock, J. T. (2016, June). Addressing the audience: Effects of evaluation on identity shift in computer-mediated environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Fukuoka, Japan. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Froming, W. J., Walker, G. R., & Lopyan, K. J. (1982). Public and private self-awareness: When personal attitudes conflict with societal expectations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(5), 476–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(82)90067-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gonzales, A. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2008). Identity shift in computer-mediated environments. Media Psychology, 11(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260802023433 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gonzales, A. L., & Kim, M. (2014). Me, my-selfie, and I: Identity shift through selfie editing and naturalistic feedback (Unpublished manuscript) First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gonzales, A. L., & Petro, G. (2020). Adding insult to algorithm: How unfavorable behavioral advertising impacts self-concept (Unpublished manuscript). First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Govern, J. M., & Marsch, L. A. (2001). Development and validation of the situational self-awareness scale. Consciousness and Cognition, 10(3), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.2001.0506 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Guilford, J. P. (1977). Will the real factor of extraversion-introversion please stand up? A reply to Eysenck. Psychological Bulletin, 84(3), 412–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.3.412 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hampton, N. D., Valov, J. J., Toutia, H., Engstrom, S. K., Mason, E. J., Le, H., Green, A. M., Crumbaugh, A., & Carr, C. T. (2020, November). Network diversity and trait desirability have no effect on identity shift: We R who we R. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Virtual Conference. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hancock, J. T., & Bailenson, J. N. (2021). The social impact of deepfakes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(3), 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2021.29208.jth First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hancock, J. T., Naaman, M., & Levy, K. (2020). AI-mediated communication: Definition, research agenda, and ethical considerations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz022 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hayes, R. A., Carr, C. T., & Wohn, D. Y. (2016). One click, many meanings: Interpreting paralinguistic digital affordances in social media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(1), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127248 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self‐disclosure in computer‐mediated communication: The role of self‐awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.36 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Johnson, B. K., & Van der Heide, B. (2015). Can sharing affect liking? Online taste performances, feedback, and subsequent media preferences. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.018 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kelly, A. E., & Rodriguez, R. R. (2006). Publicly committing oneself to an identity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(2), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2802_8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kim, Y. W., & Gonzales, A. L. (2018). You don’t know me: Negative self-views interact with publicness and feedback to shape interpersonal impressions online. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.025 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Knapp, M. L., & Vangelisti, A. L. (2005). Relationship stages: A communication perspective. In M. L. KnappA. L. VangelistiEds., Interpersonal communication and human relationships (pp. 151–158). Allyn & Bacon. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lane, D. S., Lee, S. S., Liang, F., Kim, D. H., Shen, L., Weeks, B. E., & Kwak, N. (2019). Social media expression and the political self. Journal of Communication, 69(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy064 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Leary, M. R. (2001). The self we know the self we show: Self-esteem, self-presentation, and the maintenance of interpersonal relationships. In G. J. O. FletcherM. S. ClarkEds., Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 457–477). Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Levine, T. R., Asada, K. J., & Carpenter, C. (2009). Sample sizes and effect sizes are negatively correlated in meta-analyses: Evidence and implications of a publication bias against nonsignificant findings. Communication Monographs, 76(3), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903074685 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Litt, E. (2012). Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 330–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705195 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Matheson, K., & Zanna, M. P. (1988). The impact of computer-mediated communication on self-awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 4(3), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(88)90015-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Orive, R. (1984). Group similarity, public self-awareness, and opinion extremity: A social projection explanation of deindividuation effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(4), 727–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.727 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Peña, J., & Hill, D. (2020). Examining identity shift effects in virtual reality. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(10), 697–701. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0010 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pieschl, S., Kuhlmann, C., & Porsch, T. (2015). Beware of publicity! Perceived distress of negative cyber incidents and implications for defining cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 14(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.971363 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ratan, R., Beyea, D., Li, B. J., & Graciano, L. (2020). Avatar characteristics induce users’ behavioral conformity with small-to-medium effect sizes: A meta-analysis of the Proteus effect. Media Psychology, 23(5), 651–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1623698 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Robinson, O. C. (2009). On the social malleability of traits: Variability and consistency in Big 5 trait expression across three interpersonal contexts. Journal of Individual Differences, 30(4), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.30.4.201 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Rosenbaum, J. E., & Johnson, B. K. (2015). Picture this: Using social media to increase health and nutrition awareness (Unpublished manuscript) First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenbaum, J. E., & Johnson, B. K. (2019, May). Self-persuasion through sharing, liking, and retweeting: Identity shift on social platforms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Washington, DC First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schlenker, B. R., Dlugolecki, D. W., & Doherty, K. (1994). The impact of self-presentations on self-appraisals and behavior: The power of public commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294201002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sticca, F., & Perren, S. (2013). Is cyberbullying worse than traditional bullying? Examining the differential roles of medium, publicity, and anonymity for the perceived severity of bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 739–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9867-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sun, Y.-C. (2009). Voice blog: An exploratory study of language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 13(2), 88–103. https://doi.org/10125/44182 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Swann, W. B. Jr., & Read, S. J. (1981). Self-verification processes: How we sustain our self-conceptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17(4), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(81)90043-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tice, D. M. (1992). Self-concept change and self-presentation: The looking glass self is also a magnifying glass. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.435 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Valkenburg, P. M. (2017). Understanding self-effects in social media. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12113 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Walther, J. B. (2016). Media effects: Theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033608 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van der Heide, B., Dickinson, T., Schumaker, E. M., & DeAndrea, D. C. (2013, June). Explaining online self-influence: Exploring the effects of computer-mediation on attitude change. Paper presented at 63rd Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, London, UK. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van der Heide, B., Schumaker, E. M., Peterson, A. M., & Jones, E. B. (2013). The Proteus Effect in dyadic communication: Examining the effect of avatar appearance in computer-mediated dyadic interaction. Communication Research, 40(6), 838–860. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212438097 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(3), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2538–2557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Walther, J. B., Liang, Y. J., DeAndrea, D. C., Tong, S. T., Carr, C. T., Spottswood, E. L., & Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2011). The effect of feedback on identity shift in computer-mediated communication. Media Psychology, 14(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2010.547832 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Waterloo, S. F. (2017). Identity expression and self-concept change online: The impact of publicness and customization (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Amsterdam. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Xu, J., De’Aira, G. B., & Howard, A. (2018, August). Would you trust a robot therapist? Validating the equivalency of trust in human-robot healthcare scenarios. Paper presented at the 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Nanjing, China. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. (2007). The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ysseldyk, R., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2010). Religiosity as identity: Toward an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309349693 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zhang, X. (in press). Keeping up appearances: Testing a moderated mediation path of self-presentation motives, self-efficacy beliefs, social sharing of fitness records and fitness app uses. Behaviour & Information Technology https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1829709 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar