Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Antecedents and Effects of Online Third-Party Information on Offline Impressions

A Test of Warranting Theory

Published Online:November 04, 2022https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000360

Abstract

Abstract: Warranting theory articulates the process by which individuals connect online information to an offline target, guiding impression formation. The presence of online information alone may not innately guide impression formation about a target. Rather, the connection of that claim to perceptions of a target’s offline self should be driven by several antecedents. The reported experiment tested the antecedent factors of third-party claims with respect to perceptions and behavioral intentions toward a course instructor. Undergraduate students in the United States (N = 209) viewed a hypothetical professor-rating website reflecting a 2 (target reply: present or absent) × 2 (rater identifiability: identifiable or anonymous) × 2 (number of ratings: many or few) × 2 (average rating: present or absent) experimental design, and reported the characteristics they perceived the target professor to possess offline. Results of a structural equation model revealed only an individual’s ability to reply to online information influenced judgments of warranting value; but the warranting value of the online information influenced subsequent impressions of the target’s offline attributes.

References

  • Anonymous. (1998). To reveal or not to reveal: A theoretical model of anonymous communication. Communication Theory, 8(4), 381–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00226.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Book, L. A., Tanford, S., & Chang, W. (2018). Customer reviews are not always informative: The impact of effortful versus heuristic processing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41, 272–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.01.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Boswell, S. S. (in press). Ratemyprofessors.com evaluations affect academically entitled intentions and expectations. The Social Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1799179 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. BollenJ. S. Long (Eds.). Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carr, C. T., & Stefaniak, C. (2012). Sent from my iPhone: The medium and message as cues of sender professionalism in mobile telephony. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40(4), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2012.712707 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Clark-Gordon, C. V., & Goodboy, A. K. (2020). Instructor self-disclosure and third-party generated warrants: Student perceptions of professor social media use. Western Journal of Communication, 84(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2019.1649453 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cole, D. A., Ciesla, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2007). The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(4), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.4.381 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeAndrea, D. C. (2012). Participatory social media and the evaluation of online behavior. Human Communication Research, 38(4), 510–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01435.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeAndrea, D. C. (2014). Advancing warranting theory. Communication Theory, 24(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12033 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeAndrea, D. C., & Carpenter, C. J. (2018). Measuring the construct of warranting value and testing warranting theory. Communication Research, 45(8), 1193–1215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644022 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeAndrea, D. C., Tong, S. T., & Lim, Y.-S. (2018). What causes more mistrust: Profile owners deleting user-generated content or website contributors masking their identities? Information, Communication & Society, 21(8), 1068–1080. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301523 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeAndrea, D. C., Van Der Heide, B., Vendemia, M. A., & Vang, M. H. (2018). How people evaluate online reviews. Communication Research, 45(5), 719–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215573862 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeAndrea, D. C., & Vendemia, M. A. (2019). The influence of self-generated and third-party claims online: Perceived self-interest as an explanatory mechanism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(5), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz011 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Edwards, A., Edwards, C., Shaver, C., & Oaks, M. (2009). Computer-mediated word-of-mouth communication on RateMyProfessors.com: Expectancy effects on student cognitive and behavioral learning. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 368–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01445.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Qing, Q., & Qahl, S. (2007). The influence of computer-mediated word-of-mouth communication on student perceptions of instructors and attitudes toward learning course content. Communication Education, 55(3), 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520701236866 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, G., & Buchner, A. (2008). G*Power 3 (Version 3.0.10) [Statistical Analysis Software]. Institut fur Experimentelle Psychologie. http://www.psycho.uni-duesseldorf.de/aap/projects/gpower/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fink, E. L. (2009). The FAQs on data transformation. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310352 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2013). Trusting expert-versus user-generated ratings online: The role of information volume, valence, and consumer characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1626–1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gavilan, D., Avello, M., & Martinez-Navarro, G. (2018). The influence of online ratings and reviews on hotel booking consideration. Tourism Management, 66, 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.10.018 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hall, J. A., Pennington, N., & Lueders, A. (2014). Impression management and formation on Facebook: A lens model approach. New Media & Society, 16(6), 958–982. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813495166 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hayes, R., & Carr, C. T. (2015). Does being social matter? The effect of enabled comments on credibility and brand attitude in social media. Journal of Promotion Management, 21(3), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2015.1039178 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hayes, R. A., & Carr, C. T. (2021). Getting called out: Effects of feedback to social media corporate social responsibility statements. Public Relations Review, 47(1), Article 101962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101962 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Johnson, B. K., Bradshaw, A. S., Davis, J., Diegue, V., Frost, L., Hinds, J., Lin, T., Mizell, C., Quintana, D., & Wang, R. (2022). Credible influencers: Sponsored YouTube personalities and effects of warranting cues. Journal of Media Psychology, 34(4), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000310 First citation in articleAbstract, Google Scholar

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2013). LISREL (Version 9.10) [Computer software]. Scientific Software International. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lane, B. L. (2018). Still too much of a good thing? The replication of Tong, Van Der Heide, Langwell, and Walther (2008). Communication Studies, 69(3), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1463273 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lew, Z., & Walther, J. B. (2017, May 25). Authenticity of an online communicator: Toward an integration of credibility and warranting theory. [Paper presentation]. Annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Diego, CA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Liang, Y. (2015). Responses to negative student evaluations on RateMyProfessors.com: The effect of instructor statement of credibility on student lower-level cognitive learning and state motivation to learn. Communication Education, 64(4), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1047877 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lodge, M. (1981). Magnitude scaling: Quantitative measurement of opinions. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984874.n3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCroskey, J., & McCain, T. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757409375845 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCroskey, J. C. (1966). Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 33(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637756609375482 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., & Daly, J. A. (1975). The development of a measure of perceived homophily in interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(4), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00281.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376464 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Myers, S. A. (2004). The relationship between perceived instructor credibility and college student in-class and out-of-class communication. Communication Reports, 17(2), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934210409389382 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Myers, S. A., Horan, S. M., Kennedy-Lightsey, C. D., Madlock, P. E., Sidelinger, R. J., Byrnes, K., Frisby, B., & Mansson, D. H. (2009). The relationship between college students’ self-reports of class participation and perceived instructor impressions. Communication Research Reports, 26(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090902861580 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Newcomb, T. M. (1956). The prediction of interpersonal attraction. American Psychologist, 11(11), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046141 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Parks, M. R. (2011). Boundary conditions for the application of three theories of computer-mediated communication to MySpace. Journal of Communication, 61(4), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01569.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Peeters, G. (1972). The positive-negative asymmetry: On cognitive consistency and positivity bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 455–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010405 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Peterson, A. M., & High, A. C. (2021). Examining relationships among strategies of social information seeking on Facebook and perceived accuracy of information through warranting value and source trust. Communication Monographs, 88(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1849753 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rui, J. R. (2018). Source–target relationship and information specificity: Applying warranting theory to online information credibility assessment and impression formation. Social Science Computer Review, 36(3), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317717196 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shin, S. Y., Dai, Y., Beyea, D., Prchal, B., Makki, T. W., Schlafhauser, K., & Van Der Heide, B. (2020). Curbing negativity: Influence of providing justifications about control over user-generated comments on social media. Communication Research, 47(6), 838–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218794853 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Soper, D. (2022). A-priori Sample Size Calculator for Structural Equation Models. (Version 4.0) [Statistic calculator]. https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/calculator.aspx?id=89 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 531–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00409.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Utz, S. (2010). Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: How one’s profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(2), 314–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01522.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wallace, D., Walker, J., Lopez, T., & Jones, M. (2009). Do word of mouth and advertising messages on social networks influence the purchasing behavior of college students? Journal of Applied Business Research, 25(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v25i1.1052 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Walther, J. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. In M. L. KnappJ. A. DalyEds., The SAGE handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 443–480). Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Walther, J. B., Jang, J.-W., & Hanna Edwards, A. A. (2018). Evaluating health advice in a Web 2.0 environment: The impact of multiple user-generated factors on HIV advice perceptions. Health Communication, 33(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1242036 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. KnappJ. A. DalyEds., Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–563). Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Hamel, L. M., & Shulman, H. C. (2009). Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication Research, 36(2), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208330251 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Warkentin, D., Woodworth, M., Hancock, J. T., & Cormier, N. (2010, February 6). Warrants and deception in computer mediated communication. [Paper presentation]. 2010 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Savannah, GA. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Xie, K. L., Zhang, Z., & Zhang, Z. (2014). The business value of online consumer reviews and management response to hotel performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 43, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.07.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar