Skip to main content
Original Article

Perceiving Status (In)stability in a Low-Status Group

The Effects of Identification on Explicit and Implicit Intergroup Attitudes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000078

We examined whether perceptions of status (in)stability moderate the effects of ingroup identification on explicit and implicit intergroup attitudes. We expected that identification with Italians (low-status group) would enhance ingroup bias toward (US) Americans (high-status group) more when status was unstable rather than stable. We also predicted that the effects of identification on bias would be driven by ingroup enhancement for explicit attitudes and by both ingroup enhancement and outgroup derogation for implicit attitudes. The results revealed that identification increased explicit ingroup evaluation and ingroup bias independently from status (in)stability. However, identification increased implicit outgroup derogation only with unstable status. The results are discussed with reference to social identity theory and to the importance of considering both explicit and implicit attitudes.

References

  • Aiello, A. , Chirumbolo, A. , Leone, L. , Pratto, F. (2005). Uno studio di adattamento e validazione della scala di orientamento/tendenza alla dominanza sociale [A study for the validation of the social dominance orientation scale]. Rassegna di Psicologia, 3, 24–36. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Alexander, M. G. , Brewer, M. B. , Livingston, R. W. (2005). Putting stereotype content in context: Image theory and interethnic stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 781–794. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ashburn-Nardo, L. , Knowles, M. L. , Monteith, M. J. (2003). Black Americans’ implicit racial associations and their implications of intergroup judgment. Social Cognition, 21, 61–87. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bettencourt, B. A. , Dorr, N. , Charlton, K. , Hume, D. (2001). Status differences and intergroup bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 520–542. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745–778. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, R. , & Capozza, D. (2006). Motivational, emotional and cultural influences in social identity processes. In R. Brown, D. Capozza, (Eds.), Social identities: Motivational, emotional, cultural influences (pp. 3–29). Hove, UK: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Capozza, D. , Brown, R. , Aharpour, S. , Falvo, R. (2006). A comparison of motivational theories of identification. In R. Brown, D. Capozza, (Eds.), Social identities: Motivational, emotional, cultural influences (pp. 51–72). Hove, UK: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Capozza, D. , Trifiletti, E. , Vezzali, L. , & Andrighetto, L. (2009). Americans are barbarians or allies? Images of Americans in the Italian social context. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31, 60–68. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Crisp, R. J. , Stone, C. H. , Hall, N. R. (2006). Recategorization and subgroup identification: Predicting threats from common ingroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 230–243. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Crowne, D. P. , Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Devine, P. G. , Plant, E. A. , Blair, I. V. (2001). Classic and contemporary analyses of racial prejudice. In R. Brown, S. L. Gaertner, (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 198–217). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Doosje, B. , Spears, R. , & Ellemers, N. (2002). Social identity as both cause and effect: The development of group identification in response to anticipated and actual changes in the intergroup status hierarchy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 57–76. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dovidio, J. F. , Gaertner, S. L. (2004). Aversive racism. In M. P. Zanna, (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 1–51). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of sociostructural variables on identity enhancement strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27–57. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ellemers, N. , Spears, R. , Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161–186. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ellemers, N. , Wilke, H. , Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of the low group or individual status as individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766–778. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Falvo, R. , Capozza, D. , Dovidio, J. , Vezzali, L. (2006). Favoritismo implicito per l’ingroup: Gli effetti dell’identificazione [Implicit ingroup bias: The effects of identification]. Ricerche di Psicologia, 29, 71–88. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Federico, C. M. (1998). The interactive effects of social dominance orientation, group status, and perceived stability on favoritism for high-status group. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 119–143. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Green, D. M. , Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G. , McGhee, D. E. , Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hewstone, M. , Rubin, M. , Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575–604. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hinkle, S. , & Brown, R. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams, M. A. Hogg, (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. Wheatsheaf: Hemel Hempstead. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leonardelli, G. J. , Brewer, M. B. (2001). Minority and majority discrimination: When and why. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 468–485. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manganelli Rattazzi, A. M. , Canova, L. , Marcorin, R. (2000). La desiderabilità sociale. Un’analisi di forme brevi della scala di Marlowe e Crowne [The social desirability. An analysis of shorts form of Marlowe and Crowne’s scale]. Testing Psicometria Metodologia, 7, 5–16. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mummendey, A. , Klink, A. , Brown, R. (2001). A rejoinder to our critics and some of their misapprehensions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 187–191. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mummendey, A. , Klink, A. , Mielke, R. , Wenzel, M. , Blanz, M. (1999). Socio-structural characteristics of intergroup relations and identity management strategies: Results from a field study in East Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 259–285. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nigbur, D. , & Cinnirella, M. (2007). National identification, type and specificity of comparison and their effects on descriptions of national character. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 672–691. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 565–584. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A. (2007). Implicit-explicit relations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 65–69. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A. , Banaji, M. R. (2001). The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 19, 625–664. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Otten, S. , & Wentura, D. (1999). About the impact of automaticity in the minimal group paradigm: Evidence from affective priming tasks. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 1049–1071. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perreault, S. , Bourhis, R. Y. (1998). Social identification, interdependence and discrimination. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1, 49–66. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perreault, S. , Bourhis, R. Y. (1999). Ethnocentrism, social identification, and discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 92–103. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pettigrew, T. F. , Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–76. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pratto, F. , Sidanius, J. , Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. In W. Stroebe, M. Hewstone, (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 271–320). New York: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sassenberg, K. , Wieber, F. (2005). Don’t ignore the other half: The impact of ingroup identification on implicit measures of prejudice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 621–632. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sidanius, J. , Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spears, R. , Doosje, B. , & Ellemers, N. (1999). Commitment and the context of social perception. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, B. Doosje, (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 59–83). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, S. Worchel, (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, B. Doosje, (Eds.), Social identity (pp. 6–34). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Turner, J. C. , Brown, R. (1978). Social status, cognitive alternatives, and intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel, (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Verkuyten, M. , Reijerse, A. (2008). Intergroup structure and identity management among ethnic minority and majority groups: The interactive effects of perceived stability, legitimacy, and permeability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 106–127. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar