Managing a Social Identity Threat
Ambivalence Toward the Ingroup as Psychological Disengagement
Abstract
We examined how members of a low status group react to a social identity threat. We propose that expressing an ambivalent evaluation toward the ingroup may represent a way to manage such a threatening situation. For this study, 131 undergraduates’ identification with Italians was assessed. Participants were divided into groups, according to a situational identity threat (high vs. low). In line with hypotheses, low identifiers expressed more ambivalence toward the ingroup in the high (vs. low) threat condition. The reversed pattern emerged for high identifiers. This effect was mediated by the perception of intragroup variability, a well-known social creativity strategy. Results confirmed our interpretation of ambivalence as a form of social creativity, and are discussed in terms of social identity concerns.
References
(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 520–542.
(1998). Responding to negative social identity: A taxonomy of identity management strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 697–729.
(1977). The balance between fairness and discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 149–163.
(2001). Intergroup perception in the social context: The effects of social status and group membership on perceived out-group homogeneity and ethnocentrism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 15–31.
(1998). The highs and lows of group homogeneity. Behavioral Processes, 42, 219–238.
(2002). Ambivalence and attitudes. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 37–70.
(1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410–436.
(1995). When bad isn’t all bad: Strategic use of sample information in generalization and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 642–655.
(1993). The influence of sociostructural variables on identity management strategies. In , European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 27–57). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
(2008). Is it better to be moral than smart? The effects of morality and competence norms on the decision to work at group status improvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1397–1410.
(2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575–604.
(2006). Protecting threatened identity: Sticking with the group by emphasizing ingroup heterogeneity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1620–1632.
(1996). Achieving positive social identity: Social mobility, social creativity, and permeability of group boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 241–254.
(1994). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.
(2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305.
(1988). Group status and perception of homogeneity. In , European review of social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 31–75). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
(2002). The effects of intergroup context of evaluation on ambivalence toward the ingroup and the outgroup. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 247–259.
(2009). Ambivalence in intergroup evaluation: The role of the fairness norm. Social Justice Research, 22, 117–133.
(1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: A meta-analytic integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103–122.
(2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852–863.
(1992). Out-group homogeneity effects in natural and minimal groups. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 536–552.
(1980). The perception of variability within in-groups and out-groups: Implications for the law of small numbers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 141–152.
(1991). Social categorization and the representation of variability information. In , European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 211–245). New York: Wiley.
(1999). Ethnocentrism, social identification, and discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 92–103.
(2005). When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high status group. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 192–200.
(1987). Perceived intragroup homogeneity in minority-majority context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 703–711.
(1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In , The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks Cole.
(1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In , Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361–386). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2009). The agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: Introducing the MAID model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 45–61.
(1989). Strategies of identity management. In , Ethnic minorities: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 59–76). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
