Skip to main content
Original Article

Out-Group Flies in the In-Group’s Ointment

Evidence of the Motivational Underpinnings of the In-Group Overexclusion Effect

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000171

People tend to misclassify ambiguous individuals as members of the out-group rather than the in-group. This in-group overexclusion effect (IO effect) is thought to occur because people are motivated to maintain their in-group’s positivity by protecting it from potential out-group intrusions. The present research tested this explanation by asking university students (N = 122) to complete a self-esteem scale and then recall the group memberships of individuals who belonged to minimal groups. Consistent with predictions, participants misassigned significantly fewer individuals to the in-group than to the out-group when the in-group was positive and the out-group was negative but not when these valences were reversed. In addition, self-esteem negatively predicted the IO effect. Alternative explanations of the IO effect are discussed.

References

  • Abrams, D. , & Hogg, M. A. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317–334. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420180403 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baumeister, R. F. , Bratslavsky, E. , Finkenauer, C. , Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boccato, G. , Capozza, D. , Falvo, R. (2003). Need for distinctiveness and ingroup overexclusion effect. Ricerche di Psicologia, 26, 65–82. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, J. , Collins, R. L. , Schmidt, G. W. (1988). Self-esteem and direct vs. indirect forms of self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 445–453. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.55.3.445 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cadinu, M. R. , Rothbart, M. (1996). Self anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 661–677. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.70.4.661 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Capozza, D. , Boccato, G. , Andrighetto, L. , Falvo, R. (2009). Categorization of ambiguous human/ape faces: Protection of ingroup but not outgroup humanity. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 777–787. doi: 10.1177/1368430209344868 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Castano, E. (2004). In case of death, cling to the ingroup. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 375–384. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.211 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Castano, E. , Yzerbyt, V. Y. , Bourguignon, D. , Seron, E. (2002). Who may enter? The impact of ingroup identification on ingroup-outgroup categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 315–322. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2001.1512 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Castelli, L. , Gorrasi, F. , Arcuri, L. (2000). The phenomenon of overexclusion by one’s own group during a memory task: A motivational explanation. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 27, 261–279. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Corneille, O. , Hugenberg, K. , Potter, T. (2007). Applying the attractor field model to social cognition: Perceptual discrimination is facilitated, but memory is impaired for faces displaying evaluatively congruent expressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 335–352. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.335 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dazzi, C. , Voci, A. , Brambilla, F. , Capozza, D. (1996). Ingroup overexclusion: Stability of the effect. In R. Romaioli, M. Dondi, C. Dazzi, (Eds.), Experimental and theoretical studies in psychology: Ph.D. students’ contributions from the psychology departments of Padua University (pp. 175–183). Padova, Italy: Cooperativa Libraria Editrice Universita di Padova. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Knowles, E. D. , Peng, K. (2005). White selves: Conceptualizing and measuring a dominant-group identity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 89, 223–241. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.2.223 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leyens, J. P. , Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1992). The ingroup overexclusion effect: Impact of valence and confirmation on stereotypical information search. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 549–569. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420220604 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Linville, P. W. (1998). The heterogeneity of homogeneity. In J. M. Darley, J. Cooper, (Eds.), Attribution and social interaction: The legacy of Edward E. Jones (pp. 423–487). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association doi: 10.1037/10286-008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Livingstone, A. G. , Spears, R. , Manstead, A. S. R. , Bruder, M. (2011). The more, the merrier? Numerical strength versus subgroup distinctiveness in minority groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 786–793. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.012 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pauker, K. B. , Weisbuch, M. , Ambady, N. , Sommers, S. R. , Adams, R. B. Jr. , Ivcevic, Z. (2009). Not so black and white: Memory for ambiguous group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 795–810. doi: 10.1037/a0013265 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rubin, M. , & Hewstone, M. (1998). Social identity theory’s self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 40–62. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0201_3 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rubin, M. , Paolini, S. , Crisp, R. J. (2010). A processing fluency explanation of bias against migrants. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sherif, M. (1967). Group conflict and co-operation. London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel, W. G. Austin, (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Yzerbyt, Y. , Castano, E. , Leyens, J. P. , Paladino, M. (2000). The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of entitativity and identification. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 257–295. doi: 10.1080/14792772043000059 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yzerbyt, V. Y. , Leyens, J. -P. , Bellour, F. (1995). The ingroup overexclusion effect: Identity concerns in decisions about group membership. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 1–16. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420250102 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar