Early-Career Researchers’ Perceptions of the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices, Potential Causes, and Open Science
Abstract
Abstract. Young researchers of today will shape the field in the future. In light of current debates about social psychology’s research culture, this exploratory survey assessed early-career researchers’ beliefs (N = 88) about the prevalence of questionable research practices (QRPs), potential causes, and open science as a possible solution. While there was relative consensus that outright fraud is an exception, a majority of participants believed that some QRPs are moderately to highly prevalent what they attributed primarily to academic incentive structures. A majority of participants felt that open science is necessary to improve research practice. They indicated to consider some open science recommendations in the future, but they also indicated some reluctance. Limitation and implications of these findings are discussed.
References
2014). Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 111, 5773–5777. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404402111
(2012). The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459060
(2009). Attraktivität von Arbeitsbedingungen in der Wissenschaft im internationalen Vergleich
([Attractiveness of working conditions in science in international comparison] . Berlin, Germany: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).2011). Report finds massive fraud at Dutch universities. Nature, 479, 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/479015a
(2012). Behavioral priming: It’s all in the mind, but whose mind? PLoS One, 7, e29081. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029081
(2017). Towards a replicable and relevant social psychology. Social Psychology, 48, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000303
(2015). A tragedy of the (academic) commons: Interpreting the replication crisis in psychology as a social dilemma for early-career researchers. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01152
(2015). “Everybody knows psychology is not a real science”: Public perceptions of psychology and how we can improve our relationship with policymakers, the scientific community, and the general public. The American Psychologist, 70, 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039405
(2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150
(2016). Embodying power: A preregistered replication and extension of the power pose effect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 623–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616652209
(2016). A multilab preregistered replication of the ego-depletion effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 546–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616652873
(2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2, e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
(2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth-telling. Psychological Science, 23, 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0956797611430953
(2013). PsychDisclosure.org: Grassroots support for reforming standards in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 424–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613491437
(1994). Collective errors and errors about the collective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 475–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205011
(1984).
(The phenomenon of social representations . In R. FarrS. MoscoviciEds., Social representations (pp. 3–69). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348, 1422–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374
(2014). Registered Reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192
(2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058
(2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, aac4716.
. (2012). Priming of social distance? Failure to replicate effects on social and food judgments. PLoS One, 7, e42510. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042510
(2012). Editors’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 528–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612465253
(2017). Stellungnahme zur Lage des wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchses in der Psychologie
([Statement on the current situation of early-career researchers in psychology] . Psychologische Rundschau, 68, 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a0003772013). Priming intelligent behavior: An elusive phenomenon. PLoS One, 8, e56515. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056515
(2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
(2012). How economics shapes science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
(Kommentar zur , „Stellungnahme zur Lage des wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchses in der Psychologie“ von Rentsch et al.
(in press).[Comment on “Statement on the current situation of early-career researchers in psychology” by Rentsch et al.] . Psychologische Rundschau, 68, 270–272. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033–3042/a0003771986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. WorchelW. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 07–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
(1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
(2016). Increasing replicability. Social Psychology, 47, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000270
(2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022790
(2012). Replication studies: Bad copy. Nature, 485, 298–300. https://doi.org/10.1038/485298a
(