Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigation
Next article
Original Article

Lower Levels of Resistance to Change (but not Opposition to Equality) Is Related to Analytic Cognitive Style

Published Online:March 15, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000328

Abstract

Abstract. In recent years, there has been increasing research attention to cognitive style differences between liberals and conservatives. While some studies have found a negative relation between conservatism and analytic thinking tendency, others have not observed such a relation. None of these studies has measured the core motives underlying conservative ideology and investigated their relation with analytic cognitive style (ACS). We predicted that ACS is related to only one of the core motives underlying conservatism (resistance to change), but not the other (opposition to equality). This hypothesis was supported in three non-Western samples (total n = 1,552). This finding may clarify why some studies found a relation between cognitive style and conservatism, while others did not.

References

  • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J. & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York, NY: Harper & Row. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Altemeyer, B. & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bahçekapili, H. G. & Yilmaz, O. (2017). The relation between different types of religiosity and analytic cognitive style. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.013 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bakker, B. N. (2017). Personality traits, income, and economic ideology. Political Psychology, 38, 1025–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12349 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baron, J. (2017). Comment on Kahan and Corbin: Can polarization increase with actively open-minded thinking? Research & Politics, 4, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168016688122 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baron, J., Scott, S., Fincher, K. & Metz, S. E. (2015). Why does the cognitive reflection test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4, 265–284. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brundidge, J., Reid, S. A., Choi, S. & Muddiman, A. (2014). The “deliberative digital divide”: Opinion leadership and integrative complexity in the US political blogosphere. Political Psychology, 35, 741–755. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12201 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Burke, E. (1999). Reflections on the revolution in France. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1790). First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Çarkoğlu, A. & Kalaycioğlu, E. (2009). The rising tide of conservatism in Turkey. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan US. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carraro, L., Castelli, L. & Macchiella, C. (2011). The automatic conservative: Ideology-based attentional asymmetries in the processing of valenced information. PLoS One, 6, e26456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026456 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chirumbolo, A. & Leone, L. (2008). Individual differences in need for closure and voting behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1279–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.11.012 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cornelis, I. & Van Hiel, A. (2006). The impact of cognitive styles on authoritarianism based conservatism and racism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2801_4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • De Neys, W. & Glumicic, T. (2008). Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking. Cognition, 106, 1248–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Deppe, K. D., Gonzalez, F. J., Neiman, J. L., Jacobs, C., Pahlke, J., Smith, K. B. & Hibbing, J. R. (2015). Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the Cognitive Reflection Test and ideology. Judgment and Decision Making, 10, 314–331. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dodd, M. D., Balzer, A., Jacobs, C. M., Gruszczynski, M. W., Smith, K. B. & Hibbing, J. R. (2012). The political left rolls with the good; the political right confronts the bad. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Biological Sciences, 367, 640–649. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eidelman, S. & Crandall, C. S. (2009). On the automaticity of the status quo. In J. T. JostA. C. KayH. ThórisdóttirEds., Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 85–105). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eidelman, S., Crandall, C. S., Goodman, J. A. & Blanchar, J. C. (2012). Low-effort thought promotes political conservatism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 808–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212439213 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eidelman, S., Crandall, C. S. & Pattershall, J. (2009). The existence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 765–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017058 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Federico, C. M. C., Ergun, D. & Hunt, C. (2014). Opposition to equality and support for tradition as mediators of the relationship between epistemic motivation and system-justifying identifications. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 524–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213517273 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Feldman, S. & Johnston, C. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 35, 337–358. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Haigh, M. (2016). Has the standard cognitive reflection test become a victim of its own success? Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 12, 145–149. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0193-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B. & Alford, J. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13001192 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J., Ditto, P. & Haidt, J. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLoS One, 7, e42366. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042366 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. The American Psychologist, 61, 651–670. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jost, J. T., Napier, J. L., Thórisdóttir, H., Gosling, S. D., Palfai, T. P. & Ostafin, B. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 989–1007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301028 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jost, J. T., Sterling, J. & Stern, C. (2018). Getting closure on conservatism, or the politics of epistemic and existential motivation. In C. E. KopetzA. FishbachEds., The motivation-cognition interface; From the lab to the real world: A Festschrift in honor of Arie W. Kruglanski (pp. 56–87). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 407–424. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kemmelmeier, M. (1997). Need for closure and political orientation among German university students. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 787–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549709595501 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kluegel, J. R. & Smith, E. R. (1983). Affirmative action attitudes: Effects of self-interest, racial affect, and stratification beliefs on whites’ views. Social Forces, 61, 797–824. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kruglanski, A. W. (2004). The psychology of closed mindedness. New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kruglanski, A. W. & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay inferences: Effects of impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90022-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Küçüker, A. (2007). Gençlerin siyasal ve kültürel tutumları-Ankara örneği [Political and cultural attitudes of Turkish youth: The case of Ankara] (Unpublished master thesis). Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Landau, M. J., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., Pyszczynski, T., Arndt, J., … Cook, A. (2004). Deliver us from evil: The effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1136–1150. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Landy, J. F. (2016). Representations of moral violations: Category members and associated features. Judgment and Decision Making, 11, 496–508. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, I. A. & Preacher, K. J. (2013, September). Calculation for the test of the difference between two dependent correlations with one variable in common. [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://quantpsy.org First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Malka, A., Soto, C. J., Inzlicht, M. & Lelkes, Y. (2014). Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 1031–1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036170 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nash, K., Baumgartner, T. & Knoch, D. (2017). Group-focused morality is associated with limited conflict detection and resolution capacity: Neuroanatomical evidence. Biological Psychology, 123, 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.12.018 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nilsson, A. & Erlandsson, A. (2015). The Moral Foundations taxonomy: Structural validity and relation to political ideology in Sweden. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 28–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.049 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Özbudun, E. (2006). Changes and continuities in the Turkish party system. Representation, 42, 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890600736366 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Paolacci, G., Chandler, J. & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411–419. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J. & Fugelsang, J. A. (2014). The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values. Thinking & Reasoning, 20, 188–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.865000 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J. & Fugelsang, J. A. (2012). Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123, 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pennycook, G. & Ross, R. M. (2016). Commentary: Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Piazza, J. & Sousa, P. (2014). Religiosity, political orientation, and consequentialist moral thinking. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613492826 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M. & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sarıbay, S. A., Olcaysoy Ökten, I. & Yılmaz, O. (2017). Kişisel ve toplumsal düzeylerde eşitliğe karşıtlık ve değişime direnmenin muhafazakârlıkla ilişkisi [The relationship between conservatism and opposition to equality and resistance to change at the personal and societal levels]. Turkish Psychological Articles, [Türk Psikoloji Yazıları], 39, 24–41. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Saribay, S. A. & Yilmaz, O. (2017). Analytic cognitive style and cognitive ability differentially predict religiosity and social conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 114, 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.056 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sinayev, A. & Peters, E. (2015). Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 532. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00532 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sinn, J. S. & Hayes, M. W. (2017). Replacing the moral foundations: An evolutionary‐coalitional theory of liberal‐conservative differences. Political Psychology, 38, 1043–1064. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stieger, S. & Reips, U. (2016). A limitation of the Cognitive Reflection Test: familiarity. PeerJ, 4, e2395. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2395 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sterling, J., Jost, J. T. & Pennycook, G. (2016). Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit? Judgment and Decision Making, 11, 352–360. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stone, W. F. (1994). Conservatism/liberalism. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 1, 701–707. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Suedfeld, P. & Tetlock, P. E. (1977). Integrative complexity of communications in international crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200277702100108 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Talhelm, T., Haidt, J., Oishi, S., Zhang, X., Miao, F. F. & Chen, S. (2015). Liberals think more analytically (more “WEIRD”) than conservatives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214563672 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.74 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thomson, K. S. & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2016). Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test. Judgment and Decision Making, 11, 99–113. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Thórisdóttir, H. & Jost, J. T. (2011). Motivated closed-mindedness mediates the effect of threat on political conservatism. Political Psychology, 32, 785–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00840.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Berkel, L., Crandall, C. S., Eidelman, S. & Blanchar, J. C. (2015). Hierarchy, dominance, and deliberation: Egalitarian values require mental effort. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1207–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215591961 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Webster, D. M. & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wilson, G. D. & Patterson, J. R. (1968). A new measure of conservatism. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8, 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1968.tb00568.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yilmaz, O. & Saribay, S. A. (2016). An attempt to clarify the link between cognitive style and political ideology: A non-western replication and extension. Judgment and Decision Making, 11, 287–300. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Yılmaz, O., Sarıbay, S. A., Bahçekapılı, H. G. & Harma, M. (2016). Political orientations, ideological self-categorizations, party preferences, and moral foundations of young Turkish voters. Turkish Studies, 17, 544–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2016.1221312 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yilmaz, O. & Saribay, S. A. (2017a). Analytic thought training promotes liberalism on contextualized (but not stable) political opinions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 789–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616687092 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yilmaz, O. & Saribay, S. A. (2017b). The relationship between cognitive style and political orientation depends on the measures used. Judgment and Decision Making, 12, 140–147. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Yilmaz, O. & Saribay, S. A. (2017c). Activating analytic thinking enhances the value given to individualizing moral foundations. Cognition, 165, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zitek, E. M. & Tiedens, L. Z. (2011). The fluency of social hierarchy: The ease with which hierarchical relations are seen, remembered, learned, and liked. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 98–115. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar