Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Replication

The Relationship Between Immorality and Cleansing

A Meta-Analysis of the Macbeth Effect

Published Online:September 03, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000349

Abstract

Abstract. In a widely publicized set of studies, participants who were primed to consider unethical events preferred cleansing products more than did those primed with ethical events (Zhong & Liljenquist, 2006). This tendency to respond to moral threat with physical cleansing is known as the Macbeth Effect. Several subsequent efforts, however, did not replicate this relationship. The present manuscript reports the results of a meta-analysis of 15 studies testing this relationship. The weighted mean effect size was small across all studies (g = 0.17, 95% CI [0.04, 0.31]), and nonsignificant across studies conducted in independent laboratories (g = 0.07, 95% CI [−0.04, 0.19]). We conclude that there is little evidence for an overall Macbeth Effect; however, there may be a Macbeth Effect under certain conditions.

References References marked with an asterisk (*) indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.

  • Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., … van ‘t Veer, A. (2014). The Replication Recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Denke, C., Rotte, M., Heinze, H.-J. & Schaefer, M. (2016). Lying and the subsequent desire for toothpaste: Activity in the somatosensory cortex predicts embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu170 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • DerSimonian, R. & Laird, N. (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 7, 177–188. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • D’Olimpio, F. & Mancini, F. (2014). Role of deontological guilt in obsessive-compulsive disorder-like checking and washing behavior. Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 727–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702614529549 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Doyen, S., Klein, O., Simons, D. J. & Cleeremans, A. (2014). On the other side of the mirror: Priming in cognitive and social psychology. Social Cognition, 32, 12–32. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.supp.12 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Earp, B. D. (2017). The need for reporting negative results– A 90 year update. Journal of Clinical and Translational Research, 3(S2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.18053/jctres.03.2017S2.001 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Earp, B. D., Everett, J. A. C., Madva, E. N. & Hamlin, J. K. (2014). Out, damned spot: Can the “Macbeth Effect” be replicated? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2013.856792 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Earp, B. D., Jarudi, I., Hamlin, J. K. & Madva, E. N. (2008). Unexpected failure to replicate Zhong & Liljenquist (2006): Results from a pilot study. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Earp, B. D. & Trafimow, D. (2015). Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 621. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00621 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Fayard, J. V., Bassi, A. K., Bernstein, D. M. & Roberts, B. W. (2009). Is cleanliness next to godliness? Dispelling old wives’ tales: Failure to replicate Zhong and Liljenquist (2006). Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 6, 1539–8714. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Gamez, E., Diaz, J. M. & Marrero, H. (2011). The uncertain universality of the Macbeth Effect with a Spanish sample. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14, 156–162. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n1.13 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gollwitzer, M. & Melzer, A. (2012). Macbeth and the joystick: Evidence for moral cleansing after playing a violent video game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1356–1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hedges, L. V. & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Higgins, J. P. T. & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F. & Botella, J. (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? Psychological Methods, 11, 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2008). Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology, 19, 640–648. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818131e7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kalanthroff, E., Aslan, C. & Dar, R. (2017). Washing away your sins will set your mind free: Physical cleansing modulates the effect of threatened morality on executive control. Cognition and Emotion, 31, 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1086313 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Landau, M. J., Meier, B. P. & Keefer, L. A. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1045–1067. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020970 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Lee, S. W. S. & Schwarz, N. (2010). Dirty hands and dirty mouths: Embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor is specific to the motor modality involved in moral transgression. Psychological Science, 21, 1423–1425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610382788 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Levine, T., Asada, K. J. & Carpenter, C. (2009). Sample sizes and effect sizes are negatively correlated in meta-analysis: Evidence and implications of a publication bias against non-significant findings. Communication Monographs, 76, 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903074685 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Loersch, C. & Payne, B. K. (2011). The situated inference model: An integrative account of the effects of primes on perception, behavior, and motivation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 234–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406921 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R. & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Protzko, J. & Schooler, J. W. (2017). Decline effects: Types, mechanisms, and personal reflections. In S. O. LilienfeldI. W. WaldmanEds., Psychological science under scrutiny: Recent challenges and proposed solutions (pp. 85–107). Chichester, UK: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reuven, O., Liberman, N. & Dar, R. (2014). The effect of physical cleaning on threatened morality in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 224–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702613485565 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rothschild, Z. K., Landau, M. J., Keefer, L. A. & Sullivan, D. (2015). Another’s punishment cleanses the self: Evidence for a moral cleansing function of punishing transgressors. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 722–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9487-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Schaefer, M. (in press). Morality and soap in engineers and social scientists: The Macbeth effect interacts with pro1fessions. Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0937-8 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schaefer, M., Rotte, M., Heinze, H.-J. & Denke, C. (2015). Dirty deeds and dirty bodies: Embodiment of the Macbeth effect is mapped topographically onto the somatosensory cortex. Scientific Reports, 5, 18051. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18051 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schnall, S., Benton, J. & Harvey, S. (2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19, 1219–1222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02227.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Siev, J. (2008). Unpublished raw data, First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Simons, D. J. (2014). The value of direct replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613514755 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thomas, J., Grey, I. & Al-Romaithi, S. (2018). Macbeth Arabia: Moral threat and cleansing-related construct accessibility in Arab women. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 21, 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2017.1381675 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Zhong, C.-B. (2007). Unpublished raw data, First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Zhong, C.-B. & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451–1452. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130726 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar