Elective Abortion Predicts the Dehumanization of Women and Men Through the Mediation of Moral Outrage
Abstract
Abstract. This research addresses the important issue of abortion, still controversial in Western countries. It provides a new perspective by examining attitudes not to abortion itself, but to women and their partners who decide to have an abortion. Through two experimental studies, we expected and found that the decision to abort increased moral outrage toward a woman (Study 1 and Study 2) and her male partner (Study 2). Moreover, we found that the decision to abort reduced a woman’s (Study 1 and Study 2) and man’s (Study 2) humanness through the mediation of elicited moral outrage. These findings clarify the continuing prevalence and perpetuation of disparaging attitudes toward those who seek an abortion, and suggest many directions for future research.
References
2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 751. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
(2008). Report of the APA Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion. Washington, DC: Author.
(2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 1086–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010
(2003). Changing attitudes towards abortion in Europe. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 8, 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/ejc.8.2.109.121
(2016). Parenthood as a moral imperative? Moral outrage and the stigmatization of voluntarily childfree women and men. Sex Roles, 76, 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0606-1
(Bain, P. G.Vaes, J.Leyens, J. P. (Eds.). (2014). Humanness and dehumanization. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
2013). The roles of dehumanization and moral outrage in retributive justice. PLoS one, 8, e61842. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061842
(2010). Excluded from humanity: The dehumanizing effects of social ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.022
(2011). Blaming, praising, and protecting our humanity: The implications of everyday dehumanization for judgments of moral status. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X521383
(1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215
(2008). Better never to have been: The harm of coming into existence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(2008). Psychological aspects of retributive justice. Advances in experimental social psychology, 40, 193–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00004-4
(2000). (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 741–760. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.416
(2013). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward women in different stages of reproductive life: A semantic, cross-cultural approach. Health Care for Women International, 35, 634–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2012.740113
(2014). Introduction: Bringing abortion stigma into focus. Women & Health, 54, 593–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2014.947218
(1949). The second sex. New York, NY: Vintage Book.
(1995). College students’ attitudes toward abortion: The role of knowledge and demographic variables. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1996–2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01828.x
(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
(2018). Instrumental variables and 2SLS regression. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates.
(2000). When no means no: Disbelief, disregard and deviance as discourses of voluntary childlessness. Women’s Studies International Forum, 23, 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(00)00076-5
(2013). Why are childless women childless? Findings from an exploratory study in Victoria, Australia. Journal of Social Inclusion, 4, 70–89.
(2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013748
(2016). Abortion stigma: A systematic review. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 48, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1363/48e8516
(2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
(2012). Morality, mind, and humanness. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 172–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.655236
(2012). Humanness, dehumanization, and moral psychology. The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil, 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/13091-011
(2014). Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045
(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2007).
(Gender stereotypes in the workplace: Obstacles to women’s career progress . In S. J. CorrellEd., Social psychology of gender (pp. 47–77). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.2013). Conscientious objection and induced abortion in Europe. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 18, 231–233. https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2013.819848
(2005). Attitudes toward abortion, religion, and party affiliation among college students. Current Psychology, 24, 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-005-1002-0
(2004). The relationship between attitudes about abortion and cognitive complexity. Journal of Undergraduate Research, VII. Retrieved from https://www.uwlax.edu/URC/JUR-online/PDF/2004/hill.pdf
(2016). Benevolent sexism, attitudes toward motherhood, and reproductive rights a multi-study longitudinal examination of abortion attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 970–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216649607
(2014). The precious vessel: Ambivalent sexism and opposition to elective and traumatic abortion. Sex Roles, 71, 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0423-3
(2002). Gender, employment status, and abortion: A longitudinal analysis. Sex Roles, 47, 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021427014047
(2009). Conceptualising abortion stigma. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 11, 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050902842741
(2004). Abortion: the legal right has been won, but not the moral right. Reproductive Health Matters, 12, 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(04)24016-2
(2014). Does “humanization” of the preborn explain why conservatives (vs. liberals) oppose abortion? Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.11.009
(2009). Abortion and mental health: Evaluating the evidence. The American Psychologist, 64, 863–890. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017497
(1999). Abortion as stigma: cognitive and emotional implications of concealment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 735–745. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.735
(2015). Foetus or child? Abortion discourse and attributions of humanness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 500–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12096
(2000). Trends in abortion attitude among young adults: 1977–1993. American Journal of Health Studies, 16, 85–98.
(2006). Voluntarily childfree women: Experiences and counselling considerations. Journal of Mental Health Counselling, 28, 269–284. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.28.3.39w5h93mreb0mk4f
(1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3, 313–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048081
(2010). Deadline for parenthood: Fertility postponement and age norms in Poland. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de démographie, 26, 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-009-9194-x
(2011). Abortion stigma: A reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences. Women’s Health Issues, 21, S49–S54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2011.02.010
(2010). The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 923–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210371949
(2009).
(Social dominance orientation, ambivalent sexism, and abortion: Explaining pro-choice and pro-life attitudes . In L. B. PalcroftM. V. LopezEds., Personality assessment: New research (pp. 309–320). New York, NY: Nova Science.2012). When benevolence backfires: Benevolent sexists’ opposition to elective and traumatic abortion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00890.x
(2016). From political opponents to enemies? The role of perceived moral distance in the animalistic dehumanization of the political outgroup. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215590490
(2007). The role of moral emotions in predicting support for political actions in post‐war Iraq. Political Psychology, 28, 227–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00563.x
(2014). Pro: Reclaiming abortion rights. New York, NY: Picador.
(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40, 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
(2016). Attitudes on Abortion: A cross-sectional analysis of medical students in their preclinical years. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 127, 51S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000483858.56193.8d
(2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of social issues, 57(4), 743–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00239
(2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 28, 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003
(2013). The interactive effect of anger and disgust on moral outrage and judgments. Psychological Science, 24, 2069–2078. https://doi.org/10.1177/095679761348698
(1996). What’s the latest? Cultural age deadlines for family transitions. The Gerontologist, 36, 178–188.
(2014). Developing a scale to measure stigmatizing attitudes and beliefs about women who have abortions: results from Ghana and Zambia. Women & Health, 54, 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2014.919982
(2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0956797611417632
(2004). Political tolerance and coming to psychological closure following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks: An integrative approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204263968
(2013). Stata: Release 13. Statistical Software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
. (2002). Changing frameworks in attitudes toward abortion. Sociological Forum, 17, 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016033012225
(2016). Social exclusion of Australian childless women in their reproductive years. Social Inclusion, 4, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v4i1.489
(2013). “The proper age for parenthood” and second birth rates in Europe. European Sociological Review, 29, 1149–1161. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jct003
(2004). Social and cultural determinants of attitudes toward abortion: A test of Reiss’ hypotheses. Social Science Journal, 41, 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2003.10.008
(1984). Abortion as a stigma: In the eyes of the beholder. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(84)90020-5
(