Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000351

Abstract. This research addresses the important issue of abortion, still controversial in Western countries. It provides a new perspective by examining attitudes not to abortion itself, but to women and their partners who decide to have an abortion. Through two experimental studies, we expected and found that the decision to abort increased moral outrage toward a woman (Study 1 and Study 2) and her male partner (Study 2). Moreover, we found that the decision to abort reduced a woman’s (Study 1 and Study 2) and man’s (Study 2) humanness through the mediation of elicited moral outrage. These findings clarify the continuing prevalence and perpetuation of disparaging attitudes toward those who seek an abortion, and suggest many directions for future research.

References

  • Abele, A. E. & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 751. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • APA Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion (2008). Report of the APA Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion. Washington, DC: Author. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P. & Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 1086–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arisi, E. (2003). Changing attitudes towards abortion in Europe. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 8, 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/ejc.8.2.109.121 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ashburn-Nardo, L. (2016). Parenthood as a moral imperative? Moral outrage and the stigmatization of voluntarily childfree women and men. Sex Roles, 76, 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0606-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bain, P. G.Vaes, J.Leyens, J. P. (Eds.). (2014). Humanness and dehumanization. New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bastian, B., Denson, T. F. & Haslam, N. (2013). The roles of dehumanization and moral outrage in retributive justice. PLoS one, 8, e61842. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061842 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bastian, B. & Haslam, N. (2010). Excluded from humanity: The dehumanizing effects of social ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.022 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bastian, B., Laham, S. M., Wilson, S., Haslam, N. & Koval, P. (2011). Blaming, praising, and protecting our humanity: The implications of everyday dehumanization for judgments of moral status. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X521383 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Benatar, D. (2008). Better never to have been: The harm of coming into existence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carlsmith, K. M. & Darley, J. M. (2008). Psychological aspects of retributive justice. Advances in experimental social psychology, 40, 193–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00004-4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cauffman, E. & Steinberg, L. (2000). (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 741–760. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.416 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chrisler, J. C., Gorman, J. A., Marván, M. L. & Johnston-Robledo, I. (2013). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward women in different stages of reproductive life: A semantic, cross-cultural approach. Health Care for Women International, 35, 634–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2012.740113 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cockrill, K. & Hessini, L. (2014). Introduction: Bringing abortion stigma into focus. Women & Health, 54, 593–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2014.947218 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Beauvoir, S. (1949). The second sex. New York, NY: Vintage Book. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Esposito, C. L. & Basow, S. A. (1995). College students’ attitudes toward abortion: The role of knowledge and demographic variables. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1996–2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01828.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G. & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garson, G.D. (2018). Instrumental variables and 2SLS regression. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gillespie, R. (2000). When no means no: Disbelief, disregard and deviance as discourses of voluntary childlessness. Women’s Studies International Forum, 23, 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(00)00076-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graham, M., Hill, E., Shelly, J. & Taket, A. (2013). Why are childless women childless? Findings from an exploratory study in Victoria, Australia. Journal of Social Inclusion, 4, 70–89. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gray, K. & Wegner, D. M. (2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013748 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hanschmidt, F., Linde, K., Hilbert, A., Riedel-Heller, S. G. & Kersting, A. (2016). Abortion stigma: A systematic review. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 48, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1363/48e8516 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haslam, N. (2012). Morality, mind, and humanness. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 172–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.655236 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haslam, N., Bastian, B., Laham, S. & Loughnan, S. (2012). Humanness, dehumanization, and moral psychology. The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil, 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/13091-011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haslam, N. & Loughnan, S. (2014). Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heilman, M. E. & Parks-Stamm, E. J. (2007). Gender stereotypes in the workplace: Obstacles to women’s career progress. In S. J. CorrellEd., Social psychology of gender (pp. 47–77). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heino, A., Gissler, M., Apter, D. & Fiala, C. (2013). Conscientious objection and induced abortion in Europe. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 18, 231–233. https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2013.819848 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hess, J. A. & Rueb, J. D. (2005). Attitudes toward abortion, religion, and party affiliation among college students. Current Psychology, 24, 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-005-1002-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hill, A. (2004). The relationship between attitudes about abortion and cognitive complexity. Journal of Undergraduate Research, VII. Retrieved from https://www.uwlax.edu/URC/JUR-online/PDF/2004/hill.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Huang, Y., Davies, P. G., Sibley, C. G. & Osborne, D. (2016). Benevolent sexism, attitudes toward motherhood, and reproductive rights a multi-study longitudinal examination of abortion attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 970–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216649607 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huang, Y., Osborne, D., Sibley, C. G. & Davies, P. G. (2014). The precious vessel: Ambivalent sexism and opposition to elective and traumatic abortion. Sex Roles, 71, 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0423-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jelen, T. G., Damore, D. F. & Lamatsch, T. (2002). Gender, employment status, and abortion: A longitudinal analysis. Sex Roles, 47, 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021427014047 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kumar, A., Hessini, L. & Mitchell, E. M. (2009). Conceptualising abortion stigma. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 11, 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050902842741 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Løkeland, M. (2004). Abortion: the legal right has been won, but not the moral right. Reproductive Health Matters, 12, 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(04)24016-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacInnis, C. C., MacLean, M. H. & Hodson, G. (2014). Does “humanization” of the preborn explain why conservatives (vs. liberals) oppose abortion? Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.11.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Major, B., Appelbaum, M., Beckman, L., Dutton, M. A., Russo, N. F. & West, C. (2009). Abortion and mental health: Evaluating the evidence. The American Psychologist, 64, 863–890. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017497 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Major, B. & Gramzow, R. H. (1999). Abortion as stigma: cognitive and emotional implications of concealment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 735–745. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.735 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mikołajczak, S. & Bilewicz, M. (2015). Foetus or child? Abortion discourse and attributions of humanness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 500–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12096 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Misra, R. & Hohman, S. (2000). Trends in abortion attitude among young adults: 1977–1993. American Journal of Health Studies, 16, 85–98. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mollen, D. (2006). Voluntarily childfree women: Experiences and counselling considerations. Journal of Mental Health Counselling, 28, 269–284. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.28.3.39w5h93mreb0mk4f First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Montada, L. & Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3, 313–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048081 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mynarska, M. (2010). Deadline for parenthood: Fertility postponement and age norms in Poland. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de démographie, 26, 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-009-9194-x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Norris, A., Bessett, D., Steinberg, J. R., Kavanaugh, M. L., De Zordo, S. & Becker, D. (2011). Abortion stigma: A reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences. Women’s Health Issues, 21, S49–S54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2011.02.010 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Okimoto, T. G. & Brescoll, V. L. (2010). The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 923–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210371949 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Osborne, D. & Davies, P. G. (2009). Social dominance orientation, ambivalent sexism, and abortion: Explaining pro-choice and pro-life attitudes. In L. B. PalcroftM. V. LopezEds., Personality assessment: New research (pp. 309–320). New York, NY: Nova Science. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Osborne, D. & Davies, P. G. (2012). When benevolence backfires: Benevolent sexists’ opposition to elective and traumatic abortion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00890.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pacilli, M. G., Roccato, M., Pagliaro, S. & Russo, S. (2016). From political opponents to enemies? The role of perceived moral distance in the animalistic dehumanization of the political outgroup. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215590490 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pagano, S. J. & Huo, Y. J. (2007). The role of moral emotions in predicting support for political actions in post‐war Iraq. Political Psychology, 28, 227–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00563.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pollit, K. (2014). Pro: Reclaiming abortion rights. New York, NY: Picador. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40, 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenheck, R. E., Feigal, C., Brown, N., Barcellos, T. & Bender, N. (2016). Attitudes on Abortion: A cross-sectional analysis of medical students in their preclinical years. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 127, 51S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000483858.56193.8d First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rudman, L. A. & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of social issues, 57(4), 743–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00239 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rudman, L. A. & Phelan, J. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 28, 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Salerno, J. M. & Peter-Hagene, L. C. (2013). The interactive effect of anger and disgust on moral outrage and judgments. Psychological Science, 24, 2069–2078. https://doi.org/10.1177/095679761348698 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Settersten, R. A. Jr. & Hägestad, G. O. (1996). What’s the latest? Cultural age deadlines for family transitions. The Gerontologist, 36, 178–188. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shellenberg, K. M., Hessini, L. & Levandowski, B. A. (2014). Developing a scale to measure stigmatizing attitudes and beliefs about women who have abortions: results from Ghana and Zambia. Women & Health, 54, 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2014.919982 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D. & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0956797611417632 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W. & Mullen, E. (2004). Political tolerance and coming to psychological closure following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks: An integrative approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204263968 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • StataCorp. (2013). Stata: Release 13. Statistical Software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Strickler, J. & Danigelis, N. L. (2002). Changing frameworks in attitudes toward abortion. Sociological Forum, 17, 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016033012225 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Turnbull, B., Graham, M. L. & Taket, A. R. (2016). Social exclusion of Australian childless women in their reproductive years. Social Inclusion, 4, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v4i1.489 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Bavel, J. & Nitsche, N. (2013). “The proper age for parenthood” and second birth rates in Europe. European Sociological Review, 29, 1149–1161. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jct003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, G. & Buffalo, M. D. (2004). Social and cultural determinants of attitudes toward abortion: A test of Reiss’ hypotheses. Social Science Journal, 41, 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2003.10.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weidner, G & Griffitt, W. (1984). Abortion as a stigma: In the eyes of the beholder. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(84)90020-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar