Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Next article
Original Article

Conformity Within the Campbell Paradigm

Proposing a New Measurement Instrument

Published Online:February 27, 2019https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000366

Abstract

Abstract. Conformity – people’s propensity to comply with the norms and expectations of others – is an important driver of behavior. In this research, we develop a measure of people’s level of conformity which is grounded in an innovative paradigm from attitude research. By relying on relatively easy-to-answer questions about past activities, the new scale addresses some of the conceptual and methodical shortcomings of existing conformity measures. Using a sample of 1,398 people, we calibrated individuals’ claims about how they have conformed with norms, conventions, and the expectations of others in the past. Even though some conformity items seem somewhat gender sensitive, all 33 of them nevertheless form a fairly reliable Rasch scale (rel = .67). Convergent and discriminant validity were corroborated with substantial overlaps with traditional conformity, social desirability, and conscientiousness measures, and with a moderate negative correspondence with people’s desire for uniqueness. Incremental and explanatory validity was provided in a quasi-experiment (n = 152) on evaluations of commercials.

References

  • Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70, 1–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093718 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bègue, L., Beauvois, J.-L., Courbet, D., Oberlé, D., Lepage, J., & Duke, A. A. (2015). Personality predicts obedience in a Milgram paradigm. Journal of Personality, 83, 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12104 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bilsky, W., & Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Values and personality. European Journal of Personality, 8, 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410080303 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brügger, A., Kaiser, F. G., & Roczen, N. (2011). One for all? Connectedness to nature, inclusion of nature, environmental identity, and implicit association with nature. European Psychologist, 16, 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000032 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Burger, J. M. (2009). Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? American Psychologist, 64, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0010932 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Byrka, K. (2009). Attitude-behavior consistency: Campbell’s paradigm in environmental and health domains. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Byrka, K., & Kaiser, F. G. (2013). Health performance of individuals within the Campbell paradigm. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 986–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.702215 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Byrka, K., Kaiser, F. G., & Olko, J. (2017). Understanding the acceptance of nature-preservation-related restrictions as the result of the compensatory effects of environmental attitude and behavioral costs. Environment and Behavior, 49, 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516653638 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Campbell, D. T. (1963). Social attitudes and other acquired behavioral dispositions. In S. KochEd., Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 6, pp. 94–172). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Charles, E. P. (2005). The correction for attenuation due to measurement error: Clarifying concepts and creating confidence sets. Psychological Methods, 10, 206–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.2.206 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chudek, M., & Henrich, J. (2011). Culture–gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Comrey, A. L. (1970). Manual for the Comrey Personality Scales. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Comrey, A. L. (2008). The Comrey Personality Scales. In G. J. BoyleG. MatthewsD. H. SaklofskeEds., The Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment (pp. 113–134). London, UK: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047358 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeCoster, J., Iselin, A. M., & Gallucci, M. (2009). A conceptual and empirical examination of justifications for dichotomization. Psychological Methods, 14, 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016956 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dillman, D. A. (2001). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Feldman, S. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24, 41–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00316 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • García-Pérez, M. A., Alcalá-Quintana, R., & García-Cueto, E. (2010). A comparison of anchor-item designs for the concurrent calibration of large banks of Likert-type items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 580–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621609351259 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 472–482. https://doi.org/10.1086/586910 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Haun, D. B. M., Rekers, Y., & Tomasello, M. (2012). Majority-biased transmission in chimpanzees and human children, but not orangutans. Current Biology, 22, 727–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kaiser, F. G. (1998). A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01712.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kaiser, F. G., Byrka, K., & Hartig, T. (2010). Reviving Campbell’s Paradigm for attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310366452 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kaiser, F. G., Doka, G., Hofstetter, P., & Ranney, M. A. (2003). Ecological behavior and its environmental consequences: A life cycle assessment of a self-report measure. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00075-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kaiser, F. G., Schultz, P. W., Berenguer, J., Corral-Verdugo, V., & Tankha, G. (2008). Extending planned environmentalism: Anticipated guilt and embarrassment across cultures. European Psychologist, 13, 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.288 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2000). Assessing people’s general ecological behavior: A cross-cultural measure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 952–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02505.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1531–1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2017). The Campbell paradigm as a behavior-predictive reinterpretation of the classical tripartite model of attitudes. Manuscript submitted for publication. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Neuberg, S. L., & Schaller, M. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 292–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369469 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2008). The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages. Journal of Personality, 76, 1001–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00512.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Ogunfowora, B., Bourdage, J. S., & Shin, K.-H. (2010). The personality bases of socio-political attitudes: The role of Honesty–Humility and Openness to Experience. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.08.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Liu, X. (2010). Using and developing measurement instruments in science education: A Rasch modeling approach. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mair, P., Hatzinger, R., Maier, M. J., & Rusch, T. (2018). eRm: Extended Rasch modeling (Version 0.16-1). Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/eRm/index.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Manning, K. C., Bearden, W. O., & Madden, T. J. (1995). Consumer innovativeness and the adoption process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4, 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0404_02 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Maslach, C., Stapp, J., & Santee, R. T. (1985). Individuation: Conceptual analysis and assessment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 729–738. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.729 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Matell, M. S., & Jacoby, J. (1971). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert scale items? Study I: Reliability and validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 657–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447103100307 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mehrabian, A., & Stefl, C. A. (1995). Basic temperament components of loneliness, shyness, and conformity. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 23, 253–263. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1995.23.3.253 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Milgram, S. (1964). Group pressure and action against a person. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047759 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Milgram, S., Bickman, L., & Berkowitz, L. (1969). Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028070 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 913–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208316691 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Peabody, D. (1962). Two components in bipolar scales: Direction and extremeness. Psychological Review, 69, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0039737 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (Version 3.5.1). Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Roberts, B. W., Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 58, 103–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00301.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Knafo, A. (2002). The big five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 789–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1966). Teachers’ expectancies: Determinants of pupils’ IQ gains. Psychological Reports, 19, 115–118. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.115 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • RStudio Team. (2018). RStudio: Integrated development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, Inc. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Santor, D. A., Messervey, D., & Kusumakar, V. (2000). Measuring peer pressure, popularity, and conformity in adolescent boys and girls: Predicting school performance, sexual attitudes, and substance abuse. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005152515264 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54, 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.2.93 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Şimşek, Ö. F., & Yalınçetin, B. (2010). I feel unique, therefore I am: The development and preliminary validation of the personal sense of uniqueness (PSU) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 576–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference. New York, NY: Plenum Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stöber, J. (2001). The Social Desirability Scale-17 (SDS-17): Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and relationship with age. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.17.3.222 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Tomasello, M. (2014). The ultra-social animal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2015 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tugendhat, E. (1994). Vorlesungen über Ethik [Lectures on ethics] (2nd ed.). Frankfurt a. M., Germany: Suhrkamp. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wickham, H. (2018). ggplot2: Create elegant data visualisations using the grammar of graphics (Version 2.2.1). Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggplot2/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wilke, C. O. (2018). cowplot: Streamlined plot theme and plot annotations for “ggplot2” (Version 0.9.3). Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/cowplot/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wittenbrink, B., & Schwarz, N. (2007). Implicit measures of attitudes. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wright, B., & Stone, M. (1999). Measurement essentials (2nd ed.). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zhu, X., & Lu, C. (2017). Re-evaluation of the New Ecological Paradigm scale using item response theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.10.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar