Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Nuancing Perspective

Feedback Shapes the Understanding of Another’s Emotions

Published Online:August 11, 2021https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000452

Abstract

Abstract. Two experiments manipulated participants’ familiarity with another person and examined their performance in future understanding of that person’s emotions. To gain familiarity, participants watched several videos of the target sharing experiences and rated her emotions. In the Feedback condition, perceivers learned about the actual emotions the target felt. In the Control condition, perceivers completed identical recognition tasks but did not know the target’s own emotion ratings. Studies (Ntotal = 398; one preregistered) found that the Feedback group was more accurate than the Control in future understanding of the target’s emotions. Results provide a proof-of-concept demonstration that brief preliminary learning about past emotional experiences of another person can give one a more accurate understanding of the person in the future.

References

  • Ansfield, M. E., DePaulo, B. M., & Bell, K. L. (1995). Familiarity effects in nonverbal understanding: Recognizing our own facial expressions and our friends’. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 19(3), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02175501 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Aviezer, H., Bentin, S., Dudarev, V., & Hassin, R. R. (2011). The automaticity of emotional face-context integration. Emotion, 11(6), 1406–1414. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023578 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “reading the mind in the eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00715 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barrett, L. F., Adolphs, R., Martinez, A., Marsella, S., & Pollak, S. (2019). Emotional expressions reconsidered: Challenges to inferring emotion in human facial movements. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 20, 1–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100619832930 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Batson, C. D., Sager, K., Garst, E., Kang, M., Rubchinsky, K., & Dawson, K. (1997). Is empathy-induced helping due to self–other merging? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 495–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.495 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bonferroni, C. (1936). Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilita [Statistical theory of classes and calculation of probabilities]. Pubblicazioni del R Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commericiali di Firenze, 8, 3–62. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Clarke, P., & Wheaton, B. (2007). Addressing data sparseness in contextual population research: Using cluster analysis to create synthetic neighborhoods. Sociological Methods & Research, 35(3), 311–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124106292362 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Davis, M. H., Soderlund, T., Cole, J., Gadol, E., Kute, M., Myers, M., & Weihing, J. (2004). Cognitions associated with attempts to empathize: How do we imagine the perspective of another? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1625–1635. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271183 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eckland, N. S., Leyro, T. M., Mendes, W. B., & Thompson, R. J. (2018). A multi-method investigation of the association between emotional clarity and empathy. Emotion, 18(5), 638–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000377 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap (Monographs on statistics and applied probability 57). Chapman & Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Epley, N., & Kardas, M. (in press). Understanding the minds of others: Activation, application, and accuracy of mind perception. In P. Van LangeT. HigginsEds., Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (3rd ed., pp. 1–42). The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eyal, T., Steffel, M., & Epley, N. (2018). Perspective mistaking: Accurately understanding the mind of another requires getting perspective, not taking perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(4), 547–571. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000115 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2016). Social functions of emotion and emotion regulation. In L. Feldman BarrettM. LewisJ. M. Haviland-JonesEds., Handbook of emotions (4th ed., pp. 424–439). The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.26613/esic.3.1.129 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fischer, A. H., Pauw, L. S., & Manstead, A. S. (2019). Emotion recognition as a social act: The role of the expresser–observer relationship in recognizing emotions. In U. HessS. HareliEds., The social nature of emotion expression (pp. 7–24). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32968-6_2 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Funder, D. C., & West, S. G. (1993). Consensus, self-other agreement, and accuracy in personality judgment: An introduction. Journal of Personality, 61(4), 457–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00778.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hall, J. A., & Schmid Mast, M. (2007). Sources of accuracy in the empathic accuracy paradigm. Emotion, 7(2), 438–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.438 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hertz, U., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. (2021). Adaptive empathy: A model for learning empathic responses based on feedback. https://psyarxiv.com/juc87/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hox, J. (1998). Multilevel modeling: When and why. In I. BalderjahnR. MatharM. SchaderEds., Classification, data analysis, and data highways (pp. 147–154). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72087-1_17 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Israelashvili, J., Hassin, R. R., & Aviezer, H. (2019). When emotions run high: A critical role for context in the unfolding of dynamic, real-life facial affect. Emotion, 19(3), 558–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000441 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Israelashvili, J., & Karniol, R. (2019). Feedback shapes snap judgments: Toward a dynamic model of making social judgments. https://psyarxiv.com/cbgtj/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Israelashvili, J., Oosterwijk, S., Sauter, D., & Fischer, A. (2019). Knowing me, knowing you: Emotion differentiation in oneself is associated with recognition of others’ emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 33(7), 1461–1471. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999312019.1577221 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Israelashvili, J., Pauw, L., Sauter, D., & Fischer, A. (2021). Emotion recognition from realistic dynamic emotional expressions cohere with established emotion recognition tests: A proof-of-concept validation of the Emotional Accuracy Test. Journal of Intelligence, 9(2), 25–39. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/9/2/25 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Israelashvili, J., Sauter, D., & Fischer, A. (2019). How well can we assess our ability to understand others’ feelings? Beliefs about taking others’ perspectives and actual understanding of others’ emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2475. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02475 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Israelashvili, J., Sauter, D. A., & Fischer, A. H. (2020). Different faces of empathy: Feelings of similarity disrupt recognition of negative emotions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87, Article 103912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103912 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jospe, K., Genzer, S., Klein Selle, N., Ong, D., Zaki, J., & Perry, A. (2020). The contribution of linguistic and visual cues to physiological synchrony and empathic accuracy. Cortex, 132, 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2017). Experiments with more than one random factor: Designs, analytic models, and statistical power. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 601–625. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033702 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mackes, N. K., Golm, D., O’Daly, O. G., Sarkar, S., Sonuga-Barke, E. J., Fairchild, G., & Mehta, M. A. (2018). Tracking emotions in the brain–revisiting the empathic accuracy task. NeuroImage, 178, 677–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.080 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marangoni, C., Garcia, S., Ickes, W., & Teng, G. (1995). Empathic accuracy in a clinically relevant setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 854–869. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.854 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McAuliffe, W. H., Carter, E. C., Berhane, J., Snihur, A. C., & McCullough, M. E. (2019). Is empathy the default response to suffering? A meta-analytic evaluation of perspective-taking’s effect on empathic concern. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24, 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868319887599 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Peter, J. P., Churchill, G. A. Jr., & Brown, T. J. (1993). Caution in the use of difference scores in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(4), 655–662. https://doi.org/10.1086/209329 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rauers, A., Blanke, E., & Riediger, M. (2013). Everyday empathic accuracy in younger and older couples: Do you need to see your partner to know his or her feelings? Psychological Science, 24(11), 2210–2217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613490747 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rimé, B., Mesquita, B., Boca, S., & Philippot, P. (1991). Beyond the emotional event: Six studies on the social sharing of emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 5(5–6), 435–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939108411052 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sened, H., Lavidor, M., Lazarus, G., Bar-Kalifa, E., Rafaeli, E., & Ickes, W. (2017). Empathic accuracy and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(6), 742–752. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000320 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stern, C., West, T. V., & Schoenthaler, A. (2013). The dynamic relationship between accuracy and bias in social perception research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12024 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sternglanz, R. W., & DePaulo, B. M. (2004). Reading nonverbal cues to emotions: The advantages and liabilities of relationship closeness. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28(4), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-004-4158-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thornton, M. A., Weaverdyck, M. E., & Tamir, D. I. (2019). The social brain automatically predicts others’ future mental states. The Journal of Neuroscience, 39(1), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1431-18.2018 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Welch, B. L. (1947). The generalization of “Student’s” problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika, 34, 28–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332510 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zaki, J., Bolger, N., & Ochsner, K. (2008). It takes two: The interpersonal nature of empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 19(4), 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02099.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zhou, H., Majka, E. A., & Epley, N. (2017). Inferring perspective versus getting perspective: Underestimating the value of being in another person’s shoes. Psychological Science, 28(4), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616687124 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar