Abstract
Abstract. The mere ownership effect is an increase in the subjective value of owned objects compared to identical but non-owned objects. We tested whether the effect differs in magnitude between material and immaterial objects (e.g., information). Three hundred participants played an incentivized detective game in which they had to connect clues to identify a murderer. Their task was to evaluate the usefulness of the clues they or their partners were endowed with. Despite the fact that the immaterial clues were rated as more useful than the material ones, we found the mere ownership effect to be similarly strong for the material and the immaterial clues.
References
1992). On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.229
(2020). Owning leads to valuing: Meta-analysis of the mere ownership effect. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13568.33287/2
(2019). How many words do we read per minute? A review and meta-analysis of reading rate. Journal of Memory and Language, 109, Article 104047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104047
(2003). The impact of information distribution, ownership, and discussion on group member judgment: The differential cue weighting model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00533-2
(2009). Influence: The psychology of persuasion. HarperCollins.
(2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(1), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307304092
(2005). The possessive self as a barrier to conflict resolution: Effects of mere ownership, process accountability, and self-concept clarity on competitive cognitions and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.345
(2002). A review of WTA/WTP studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44(3), 426–447. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2001.1215
(1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1325–1348.
(1989). The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves. The American Economic Review, 79(5), 1277–1284.
(2009). Bad riddance or good rubbish? Ownership and not loss aversion causes the endowment effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 947–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.014
(2019). Ownership matters: People possess a naïve theory of ownership. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(2), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.008
(2014). The preference effect in design concept evaluation. Design Studies, 35(5), 473–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2014.02.006
(1987). Affective consequences of mere ownership: The name letter effect in twelve European languages. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17(4), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420170402
(2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1086/598614
(2007). Possession, feelings of ownership and the endowment effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1086/598614
(2012). Children apply principles of physical ownership to ideas. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1383–1403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01265.x
(2021). Data and materials for “Mere ownership effect is equally pronounced in material and immaterial objects”. https://osf.io/sreyh/
(2021). jamovi. (Version 1.8) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org
. (2011). Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63(3), 107–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001
(2007). Mere exposure and the endowment effect on consumer decision making. The Journal of Psychology, 141, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.141.2.117-126
(2013). Because I’m worth it! (more than others.): Cooperation, competition, and ownership bias in group decision-making. Social Psychology, 44(4), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000109
(2009). Hidden profiles and concealed information: Strategic information sharing and use in group decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(6), 793–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209333176
(1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt. 2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848
(