Is Beauty Beastly?
Gender-Specific Effects of Leader Attractiveness and Leadership Style on Followers’ Trust and Loyalty
Abstract
While attractiveness has many positive effects in everyday life, it has been shown to negatively affect selection of female leaders, the so-called “beauty is beastly” effect. Yet, an impact on more profound variables, such as followers’ trust in and loyalty toward female leaders, remains unclear, as does its interaction with different leadership styles: transformational (characterized by charismatic behavior aimed at inspiring and motivating followers) versus transactional (characterized by a strong focus on task completion and respective rewards or punishments). We have therefore made the first empirical attempt to test the interaction effects of leader gender, leader attractiveness, and leadership style on followers’ trust and loyalty. Results from a laboratory experiment provide clear empirical support for the negative effects of attractiveness for female (but not male) leaders with a transformational leadership style. Attractiveness did not influence trust and loyalty toward male and female leaders with a transactional leadership style. The negative influence of leader attractiveness on trust and loyalty toward female transformational leaders was mediated by ascribed leader communion.
References
2011). The bigger one of the “Big Two”? Preferential processing of communal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 935–948. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.028
(2008). Towards an operationalization of fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1202–1217. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.575
(2001). Transformational leadership or the iron cage: Which predicts trust, commitment and team efficacy? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22, 315–320. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000006162
(1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
(2000). Technical report, leader form, rater form, and scoring key for the MLQ Form 5x-short. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
(1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2011). Romancing leadership: Past, present, and future. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 1058–1077. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.003
(2011). Gender bias in leader selection? Evidence from a hiring simulation study. Sex Roles, 65, 234–242. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0012-7
(1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710–725. doi: 10.2307/258391
(2006). Trust and the relationship between leadership and follower performance: Opening the black box in Australia and China. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 12, 68–84. doi: 10.1177/107179190601200305
(2002). Loyalty to supervisor vs. organizational commitment: Relationships to employee performance in China. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 339–356. doi: 10.1348/096317902320369749
(1995). Physical appearance, social skill, and performance as a leadership candidate. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 287–295. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp1603_2
(2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12, 450–467. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640
(2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611–628. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611
(2006). Men, women, and managers: Are stereotypes finally changing? Personnel Psychology, 59, 815–846. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00055.x
(2003). The rise of female leaders. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 34, 123–132. doi: 10.1024//0044-3514.34.3.123
(2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 1–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00326.x
(2003a). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807–834. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004
(2003b). Finding gender advantage and disadvantage: Systematic research integration is the solution. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 851–859. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.003
(2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569–591. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569
(2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573
(1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125–145.
(2009). In the eyes of the beholder: Transformational leadership, positive psychological capital, and performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15, 353–367. doi: 10.1177/1548051809332021
(2008). The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 530–546. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.07.011
(1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269–298.
(2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00234
(2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 81–92. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81
(1979). When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 360–372.
(1985). Being attractive, advantage or disadvantage? Performance-based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of appearance, sex, and job type. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 202–215.
(2003). The effects of physical attractiveness on job related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 56, 431–462. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00157.x
(1989). Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 302–308.
(2008). The strong, sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106, 39–60. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.12.002
(2010). Physical attractiveness biases in ratings of employment suitability: Tracking down the ‘beauty is beastly’ effect. Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 301–318. doi: 10.1080/00224540903365414
(2009). Does it pay to be smart, attractive, or confident (or all three)? Relationships among general mental ability, physical attractiveness, core self-evaluations, and income. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 742–755. doi: 10.1037/a0015497
(2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755
(2006). Charismatische und transformationale Führung: Ein Überblick und eine Agenda für zukünftige Forschungsarbeiten
([Charismatic and transformational leadership: A review and an agenda for future research] . Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 50, 203–214. doi: 10.1026/0932-4089.50.4.2032009). Moderating role of subordinates’ attitudes on transformational leadership and effectiveness: A multi-cultural and multi-level perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 586–603. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.011
(2009). Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1591–1599. doi: 10.1037/a0016539
(1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59. doi: 10.2307/256727
(2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852–863. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852
(2010). What is the value? Economic effects of ethically-oriented leadership. Journal of Psychology, 218, 198–212. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409/a000030
(1999). Fairness perceptions and trust as mediators for transformational and transactional leadership: A two-sample study. Journal of Management, 25, 897–933. doi: 10.1177/014920639902500606
(1996). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 22, 259–298. doi: 10.1177/014920639602200204
(2011). “I don’t know anything about soccer”: How personal weaknesses and strengths guide inferences about women’s qualification in sex-typed jobs. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 70, 149–154. doi: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000050
(2001). ‘Unlearning’ automatic biases: The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 856–868. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.856
(2007). Embracing transformational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1020–1030. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1020
(2011). Implicit leadership theories: Think leader, think effective? Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 141–150. doi: 10.1177/1056492610375989
(2006). Masculine = competent? Physical appearance and sex as sources of gender-stereotypic attributions. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 15–23. doi: 10.1024/1421-0185.65.1.15
(2001). Effekte des generischen Maskulinums und alternativer Sprachformen auf den gedanklichen Einbezug von Frauen
([Effects of the generic use of the masculine pronoun and alternative forms of speech on the cognitive visibility of women] . Psychologische Rundschau, 52, 131–140. doi: 10.1026//0033-3042.52.3.1312011). An exploration of stereotypical beliefs about leadership styles: Is transformational leadership a route to women’s promotion? Leadership Quarterly, 22, 10–21. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.003
(2000). Screening job applicants: The impact of physical attractiveness and application quality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 76–84. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00135
(1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115–1125. doi: 10.1177/01461672992512005
(2008). The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1139–1147. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.549
(2009). Two dimensions of interpersonal attitudes: Liking depends on communion, respect depends on agency. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 973–990. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.595
(2001). Making leadership work more effectively for women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 815–828. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00243
(2009). Moderating role of follower characteristics with transformational leadership and follower work engagement. Group and Organization Management, 34, 590–619. doi: 10.1177/1059601108331242
(