Skip to main content
Original Article

Is Beauty Beastly?

Gender-Specific Effects of Leader Attractiveness and Leadership Style on Followers’ Trust and Loyalty

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000101

While attractiveness has many positive effects in everyday life, it has been shown to negatively affect selection of female leaders, the so-called “beauty is beastly” effect. Yet, an impact on more profound variables, such as followers’ trust in and loyalty toward female leaders, remains unclear, as does its interaction with different leadership styles: transformational (characterized by charismatic behavior aimed at inspiring and motivating followers) versus transactional (characterized by a strong focus on task completion and respective rewards or punishments). We have therefore made the first empirical attempt to test the interaction effects of leader gender, leader attractiveness, and leadership style on followers’ trust and loyalty. Results from a laboratory experiment provide clear empirical support for the negative effects of attractiveness for female (but not male) leaders with a transformational leadership style. Attractiveness did not influence trust and loyalty toward male and female leaders with a transactional leadership style. The negative influence of leader attractiveness on trust and loyalty toward female transformational leaders was mediated by ascribed leader communion.

References

  • Abele, A. E. , Bruckmüller, S. (2011). The bigger one of the “Big Two”? Preferential processing of communal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 935–948. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.028 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Abele, A. E. , Uchronski, M. , Suitner, C. , & Wojciszke, B. (2008). Towards an operationalization of fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1202–1217. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.575 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arnold, K. A. , Barling, J. , Kelloway, E. K. (2001). Transformational leadership or the iron cage: Which predicts trust, commitment and team efficacy? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22, 315–320. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000006162 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bass, B. M. , Avolio, B. J. (2000). Technical report, leader form, rater form, and scoring key for the MLQ Form 5x-short. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bass, B. M. , Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bligh, M. C. , Kohles, J. C. , Pillai, R. (2011). Romancing leadership: Past, present, and future. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 1058–1077. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bosak, J. , Sczesny, S. (2011). Gender bias in leader selection? Evidence from a hiring simulation study. Sex Roles, 65, 234–242. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0012-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brief, A. P. , Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710–725. doi: 10.2307/258391 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Casimir, G. , Waldman, D. A. , Bartran, T. , Yang, S. (2006). Trust and the relationship between leadership and follower performance: Opening the black box in Australia and China. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 12, 68–84. doi: 10.1177/107179190601200305 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, Z. X. , Tsui, A. S. , Farh, J.-L. (2002). Loyalty to supervisor vs. organizational commitment: Relationships to employee performance in China. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 339–356. doi: 10.1348/096317902320369749 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cherulnik, P. D. (1995). Physical appearance, social skill, and performance as a leadership candidate. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 287–295. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp1603_2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. , Cohen, P. , West, S. G. , Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dirks, K. T. , Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12, 450–467. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dirks, K. T. , Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611–628. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duehr, E. E. , Bono, J. E. (2006). Men, women, and managers: Are stereotypes finally changing? Personnel Psychology, 59, 815–846. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00055.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H. (2003). The rise of female leaders. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 34, 123–132. doi: 10.1024//0044-3514.34.3.123 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H. (2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 1–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00326.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H. , Carli, L. L. (2003a). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807–834. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H. , Carli, L. L. (2003b). Finding gender advantage and disadvantage: Systematic research integration is the solution. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 851–859. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H. , Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. , van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569–591. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H. , Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H. , Karau, S. J. , Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125–145. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gooty, J. , Gavin, M. , Johnson, P. D. , Frazier, M. L. , Snow, D. B. (2009). In the eyes of the beholder: Transformational leadership, positive psychological capital, and performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15, 353–367. doi: 10.1177/1548051809332021 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haslam, S. A. , Ryan, M. K. (2008). The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 530–546. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.07.011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269–298. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00234 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heilman, M. E. , Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 81–92. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heilman, M. E. , Saruwatari, L. R. (1979). When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 360–372. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heilman, M. E. , Stopeck, M. H. (1985). Being attractive, advantage or disadvantage? Performance-based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of appearance, sex, and job type. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 202–215. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hosoda, M. , Stone-Romero, E. F. , Coats, G. (2003). The effects of physical attractiveness on job related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 56, 431–462. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00157.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huberty, C. J. , Morris, J. D. (1989). Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 302–308. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, S. K. , Murphy, S. E. , Zewdie, S. , Reichard, R. J. (2008). The strong, sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106, 39–60. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.12.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, S. K. , Podratz, K. E. , Dipboye, R. L. , Gibbons, E. (2010). Physical attractiveness biases in ratings of employment suitability: Tracking down the ‘beauty is beastly’ effect. Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 301–318. doi: 10.1080/00224540903365414 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Judge, T. A. , Hurst, C. , & Simon, L. S. (2009). Does it pay to be smart, attractive, or confident (or all three)? Relationships among general mental ability, physical attractiveness, core self-evaluations, and income. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 742–755. doi: 10.1037/a0015497 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Judge, T. A. , Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Judge, T. A. , Woolf, E. F. , Hurst, C. , Livingston, B. (2006). Charismatische und transformationale Führung: Ein Überblick und eine Agenda für zukünftige Forschungsarbeiten [Charismatic and transformational leadership: A review and an agenda for future research]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 50, 203–214. doi: 10.1026/0932-4089.50.4.203 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Jung, D. I. , Yammarino, F. J. , Lee, J. K. (2009). Moderating role of subordinates’ attitudes on transformational leadership and effectiveness: A multi-cultural and multi-level perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 586–603. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Madera, J. M. , Hebl, M. R. , & Martin, R. C. (2009). Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1591–1599. doi: 10.1037/a0016539 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59. doi: 10.2307/256727 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muller, D. , Judd, C. M. , Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852–863. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peus, C. , Kerschreiter, R. , Frey, D. , Traut-Mattausch, E. (2010). What is the value? Economic effects of ethically-oriented leadership. Journal of Psychology, 218, 198–212. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409/a000030 First citation in articleAbstractGoogle Scholar

  • Pillai, R. , Schriesheim, C. A. , Williams, E. S. (1999). Fairness perceptions and trust as mediators for transformational and transactional leadership: A two-sample study. Journal of Management, 25, 897–933. doi: 10.1177/014920639902500606 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M. , MacKenzie, S. B. , Bommer, W. H. (1996). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 22, 259–298. doi: 10.1177/014920639602200204 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reinhard, M.-A. , Schindler, S. , Stahlberg, D. , Messner, M. , & Mucha, N. (2011). “I don’t know anything about soccer”: How personal weaknesses and strengths guide inferences about women’s qualification in sex-typed jobs. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 70, 149–154. doi: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000050 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Rudman, L. A. , Ashmore, R. D. , Gary, M. L. (2001). ‘Unlearning’ automatic biases: The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 856–868. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.856 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schaubroeck, J. , Lam, S. S. K. , Cha, S. E. (2007). Embracing transformational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1020–1030. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1020 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schyns, B. , Schilling, J. (2011). Implicit leadership theories: Think leader, think effective? Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 141–150. doi: 10.1177/1056492610375989 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sczesny, S. , Spreemann, S. , Stahlberg, D. (2006). Masculine = competent? Physical appearance and sex as sources of gender-stereotypic attributions. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 15–23. doi: 10.1024/1421-0185.65.1.15 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Stahlberg, D. , Sczesny, S. (2001). Effekte des generischen Maskulinums und alternativer Sprachformen auf den gedanklichen Einbezug von Frauen [Effects of the generic use of the masculine pronoun and alternative forms of speech on the cognitive visibility of women]. Psychologische Rundschau, 52, 131–140. doi: 10.1026//0033-3042.52.3.131 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Vinkenburg, C. J. , Van Engen, M. L. , Eagly, A. H. , Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2011). An exploration of stereotypical beliefs about leadership styles: Is transformational leadership a route to women’s promotion? Leadership Quarterly, 22, 10–21. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watkins, L. M. , Johnston, L. (2000). Screening job applicants: The impact of physical attractiveness and application quality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 76–84. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00135 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wells, G. L. , Windschitl, P. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115–1125. doi: 10.1177/01461672992512005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wojciszke, B. , Abele, A. E. (2008). The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1139–1147. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.549 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wojciszke, B. , Abele, A. E. , Baryla, W. (2009). Two dimensions of interpersonal attitudes: Liking depends on communion, respect depends on agency. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 973–990. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.595 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yoder, J. D. (2001). Making leadership work more effectively for women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 815–828. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00243 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zhu, W. , Avolio, B. J. , Walumbwa, F. O. (2009). Moderating role of follower characteristics with transformational leadership and follower work engagement. Group and Organization Management, 34, 590–619. doi: 10.1177/1059601108331242 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar