Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Review Article

Understanding the Distributed Practice Effect

Strong Effects on Weak Theoretical Grounds

Published Online:February 28, 2015https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000168

Abstract

The distributed practice effect is one of the most researched memory effects in cognitive psychology. Beneficial distributed practice effects for long-term retention have been demonstrated in different domains and they are remarkably large in size, too. However, despite strong effects, this research field still lacks a unified theory offering explanations for a wide range of findings. This article reviews empirical studies on the distributed practice effect that have immediate relevance for educational settings. Against the backdrop of this review, the article discusses theory candidates and ways of specifying them for empirical tests using nonstandard statistical methods. I conclude that future studies will have to fine-tune theories to strengthen the significance of empirical results and to allow for better recommendations to educators. This promises to increase the enthusiasm to systematically implement distributed practice in instruction routines and bridge psychological research and educational practice.

References

  • Ambridge, B. , Theakston, A. L. , Lieven, E. V. , Tomasello, M. (2006). The distributed learning effect for children’s acquisition of an abstract syntactic construction. Cognitive Development, 21, 174–193. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.09.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Appleton-Knapp, S. L. , Bjork, R. A. , Wickens, T. D. (2005). Examining the spacing effect in advertising: Encoding variability, retrieval processes, and their interaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 266–276. doi: 10.1086/432236 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Austin, S. D. M. (1921). A study in logical memory. The American Journal of Psychology, 32, 370–403. doi: 10.2307/1414001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ausubel, D. P. (1966). Early versus delayed review in meaningful learning. Psychology in the Schools, 3, 195–198. doi: 10.1002/1520-6807(196607)3:3<195::AID-PITS2310030302>3.0.CO;2-X First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bahrick, H. P. (1979). Maintenance of knowledge: Questions about memory we forgot to ask. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 296–308. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.108.3.296 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bahrick, H. P. , Bahrick, L. E. , Bahrick, A. S. , Bahrick, P. E. (1993). Maintenance of foreign language vocabulary and the spacing effect. Psychological Science, 4, 316–321. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00571.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bahrick, H. P. , Hall, L. K. (2005). The importance of retrieval failures to long-term retention: A metacognitive explanation of the spacing effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 566–577. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.012 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bahrick, H. P. , Phelps, E. (1987). Retention of Spanish vocabulary over 8 years. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 344–349. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.13.2.344 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bellezza, F. S. , Young, D. R. (1989). Chunking of repeated events in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 990–997. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.990 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Benjamin, A. S. , Tullis, J. (2010). What makes distributed practice effective? Cognitive Psychology, 61, 228–247. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.05.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bird, S. (2010). Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of second language English syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 635–650. doi: 10.1017/S0142716410000172 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bloom, K. C. , Shuell, T. J. (1981). Effects of massed and distributed practice on the learning and retention of second-language vocabulary. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 245–248. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Braun, K. , & Rubin, D. C. (1998). The spacing effect depends on an encoding deficit, retrieval, and time in working memory: Evidence from once-presented words. Memory, 6, 37–65. doi: 10.1080/741941599 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carpenter, S. K. , Pashler, H. , Cepeda, N. J. (2009). Using tests to enhance 8th grade students retention of U.S. history facts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 760–771. doi: 10.1002/acp.1507 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carpenter, S. , Cepeda, N. , Rohrer, D. , Kang, S. K. , Pashler, H. (2012). Using spacing to enhance diverse forms of learning: Review of recent research and implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 369–378. doi: 10.1007/s10648-012-9205-z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carrier, M. , Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20, 633–642. doi: 10.3758/BF03202713 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Castillo, M. (2013, January 10). What’s the best way to learn? Psychologists tackle studying techniques. CBS News. Retrieved from www.cbsnews.com/news/whats-the-best-way-to-learn-psychologists-tackle-studying-techniques/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cepeda, N. J. , Coburn, N. , Rohrer, D. , Wixted, J. T. , Mozer, M. C. , Pashler, H. (2009). Optimizing distributed practice: Theoretical analysis and practical implications. Experimental Psychology, 56, 236–246. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.236 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Cepeda, N. J. , Pashler, H. , Vul, E. , Wixted, J. T. , Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354–380. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cepeda, N. J. , Vul, E. , Rohrer, D. , Wixted, J. T. , Pashler, H. (2008). Spacing effects in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 19, 1095–1102. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02209.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cohen, M. S. , Yan, V. X. , Halamish, V. , Bjork, R. A. (2013). Do students think that difficult or valuable materials should be restudied sooner rather than later? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1682–1696. doi: 10.1037/a0032425 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cook, T. W. (1934). Massed and distributed practice in puzzle solving. Psychological Review, 41, 330–355. doi: 10.1037/h0074350 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cull, W. L. (2000). Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 215–235. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(200005/06)14:3<215::AID-ACP640>3.0.CO;2-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Delaney, P. F. , Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L. , Spirgel, A. (2010). Spacing and testing effects: A deeply critical, lengthy, and at times discursive review of the literature. In B. H. Ross, (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 63–147). London, UK: Academic Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dempster, F. N. (1987). Effects of variable encoding and spaced presentations on vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 162–170. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.79.2.162 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dempster, F. N. (1988). The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. American Psychologist, 43, 627–634. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.43.8.627 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dunlosky, J. , Rawson, K. A. , Marsh, E. J. , Nathan, M. J. , Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4–58. doi: 10.1177/1529100612453266 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Durgunoglu, A. Y. , Mir, M. , Arino-Marti, S. (1993). Effects of repeated readings on bilingual and monolingual memory for text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 294–317. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1993.1022 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Oxford, UK: Dover. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Erdfelder, E. , Auer, T.-S. , Hilbig, B. E. , Aßfalg, A. , Moshagen, M. , Nadarevic, L. (2009). Multinomial processing tree models. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 217, 108–124. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.3.108 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Estes, W. K. (1955). Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. Psychological Review, 62, 369–377. doi: 10.1037/h0046888 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gay, L. R. (1973). Temporal position of reviews and its effect on the retention of mathematical rules. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 171–182. doi: 10.1037/h0034595 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gerbier, E. , Koenig, O. (2012). Influence of multiple-day temporal distribution of repetitions on memory: A comparison of uniform, expanding, and contracting schedules. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 514–525. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.600806 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Glenberg, A. M. (1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 7, 95–112. doi: 10.3758/BF03197590 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Glenberg, A. M. , Lehmann, T. S. (1980). Spacing repetitions over 1 week. Memory & Cognition, 8, 528–538. doi: 10.3758/BF03213772 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Glover, J. A. , Corkill, A. J. (1987). Influence of paraphrased repetitions on the spacing effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 198–199. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.79.2.198 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gordon, K. (1925). Class results with spaced and unspaced memorizing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 8, 337–343. doi: 10.1037/h0064623 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Grote, M. G. (1995). Distributed versus massed practice in high school physics. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 97–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15736.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Helsdingen, A. S. , van Gog, T. , van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2011). The effects of practice schedule on learning a complex judgment task. Learning and Instruction, 21, 126–136. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.12.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hintzman, D. L. (1974). Theoretical implications of the spacing effect. Oxford, UK: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Koedinger, K. R. , Booth, J. L. , Klahr, D. (2013). Instructional complexity and the science to constrain it. Science, 342, 935–937. doi: 10.1126/science.1238056 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kornell, N. (2009). Optimising learning using flashcards: Spacing is more effective than cramming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1297–1317. doi: 10.1002/acp.1537 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kornell, N. , Metcalfe, J. (2006). Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 609–622. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.609 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Krug, D. , Davis, T. , & Glover, J. A. (1990). Massed versus distributed repeated reading: A case of forgetting helping recall? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 366–371. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.366 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Küpper-Tetzel, C. E. , Erdfelder, E. (2012). Encoding, maintenance, and retrieval processes in the lag effect: A multinomial processing tree analysis. Memory, 20, 37–47. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2011.631550 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Küpper-Tetzel, C. E. , Erdfelder, E. , Dickhäuser, O. (2013). The lag effect in secondary school classrooms: Enhancing students’ memory for vocabulary. Instructional Science. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s11251-013-9285-2 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Küpper-Tetzel, C. E. , Kapler, I. V. , Wiseheart, M. (2014). Expanding, contracting, and equal learning schedules? The optimal distribution of learning sessions depends on retention interval. Memory & Cognition. Advance online publication. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0394-1 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lawton, T. W. , Cronin, J. B. , Lindsell, R. P. (2006). Effect of interrepetition rest intervals on weight training repetition power output. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 20, 172–176. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lindsey, R. , Mozer, M. C. , Cepeda, N. J. , Pashler, H. (2009). Optimizing memory retention with cognitive models. In A. Howes, D. Peebles, R. Cooper, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (ICCM 2009). Manchester, UK: ICCM. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lindsey, R. V. , Shroyer, J. D. , Pashler, H. , Mozer, M. C. (2014). Improving students’ long-term knowledge retention through personalized review. Psychological Science. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0956797613504302 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Magliero, A. (1983). Pupil dilations following pairs of identical and related to-be-remembered words. Memory & Cognition, 11, 609–615. doi: 10.3758/BF03198285 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Maki, R. H. , Hasher, L. (1975). Encoding variability: A role in immediate and long-term memory? The American Journal of Psychology, 88, 217–231. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mayfield, K. H. , Chase, P. N. (2002). The effects of cumulative practice on mathematics problem solving. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 105–123. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-105 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moulton, C.-A. E. , Dubrowski, A. , Macrae, H. , Graham, B. , Grober, E. , Reznick, R. (2006). Teaching surgical skills: What kind of practice makes perfect? A randomized, controlled trial. Annals of Surgery, 244, 400–409. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000234808.85789.6a First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mozer, M. C. , Pashler, H. , Cepeda, N. J. , Lindsey, R. , Vul, E. (2009). Predicting the optimal spacing of study: A multiscale context model of memory. In Y. Bengio, D. Schuurmans, J. Lafferty, C. K. I. Williams, A. Culotta, (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 1321–1329). La Jolla, CA: NIPS Foundation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Paul, A. M. (2011, September 11). The trouble with homework The New York Times p. SR6 Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2011/09/11/opinion/sunday/quality-homework-a-smart-idea.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Postman, L. , Knecht, K. (1983). Encoding variability and retention. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 133–152. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90101-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pyc, M. A. , & Rawson, K. A. (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 437–447. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.004 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Raaijmakers, J. G. (2003). Spacing and repetition effects in human memory: Application of the SAM model. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27, 431–452. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2703_5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rawson, K. A. , Kintsch, W. (2005). Rereading effects depend on time of test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 70–80. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.70 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reynolds, J. H. , Glaser, R. (1964). Effects of repetition and spaced review upon retention of a complex learning task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 297–308. doi: 10.1037/h0040734 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Riefer, D. M. , Batchelder, W. H. (1995). A multinomial modeling analysis of the recognition-failure paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 23, 611–630. doi: 10.3758/BF03197263 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Riefer, D. M. , Rouder, J. N. (1992). A multinomial modeling analysis of the mnemonic benefits of bizarre imagery. Memory & Cognition, 20, 601–611. doi: 10.3758/BF03202710 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roediger, H. L. , Pyc, M. A. (2012). Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 242–248. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.09.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roediger, H. L. , Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rohrer, D. , & Taylor, K. (2006). The effects of overlearning and distributed practise on the retention of mathematics knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1209–1224. doi: 10.1002/acp.1266 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rohrer, D. , & Taylor, K. (2007). The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning. Instructional Science, 35, 481–498. doi: 10.1007/s11251-007-9015-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Seabrook, R. , Brown, G. D. , Solity, J. E. (2005). Distributed and massed practice: From laboratory to classroom. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 107–122. doi: 10.1002/acp.1066 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shea, C. H. , Lai, Q. , Black, C. , Park, J.-H. (2000). Spacing practice sessions across days benefits the learning of motor skills. Human Movement Science, 19, 737–760. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9457(00)00021-X First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Simmons, A. L. (2012). Distributed practice and procedural memory consolidation in musicians’ skill learning. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 357–368. doi: 10.1177/0022429411424798 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Simone, P. M. , Bell, M. C. , Cepeda, N. J. (2012). Diminished but not forgotten: Effects of aging on magnitude of spacing effect benefits. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68, 674–680. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs096 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sobel, H. S. , Cepeda, N. J. , Kapler, I. V. (2011). Spacing effects in real-world classroom vocabulary learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 763–767. doi: 10.1002/acp.1747 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Son, L. K. (2010). Metacognitive control and the spacing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 255–262. doi: 10.1037/a0017892 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Staddon, J. E. R. , Chelaru, I. M. , Higa, J. J. (2002). Habituation, memory and the brain: The dynamics of interval timing. Behavioural Processes, 57, 71–88. doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00006-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Taylor, K. , & Rohrer, D. (2010). The effects of interleaved practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 837–848. doi: 10.1002/acp.1598 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thios, S. J. , D’Agostino, P. R. (1976). Effects of repetition as a function of study-phase retrieval. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15, 529–536. doi: 10.1016/0022-5371(76)90047-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Toppino, T. C. , Hara, Y. , Hackman, J. (2002). The spacing effect in the free recall of homogeneous lists: Present and accounted for. Memory & Cognition, 30, 601–606. doi: 10.3758/BF03194961 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tsai, L. S. (1927). The relation of retention to the distribution of relearning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 10, 30–39. doi: 10.1037/h0071614 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L. , Rikers, R. M. J. P. , Özsoy, B. (2008). Distributed rereading can hurt the spacing effect in text memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 685–695. doi: 10.1002/acp.1388 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L. , Rikers, R. M. J. P. , Schmidt, H. G. (2004). Detrimental influence of contextual change on spacing effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 796–800. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.796 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L. , Rikers, R. M. J. P. , Schmidt, H. G. (2005). Limitations to the spacing effect: Demonstration of an inverted u-shaped relationship between interrepetition spacing and free recall. Experimental Psychology, 52, 257–263. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.4.257 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Vlach, H. A. , Sandhofer, C. M. (2012). Distributing learning over time: The spacing effect in children’s acquisition and generalization of science concepts. Child Development, 83, 1137–1144. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01781.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wahlheim, C. N. , Maddox, G. B. , Jacoby, L. L. (2014). The role of reminding in the effects of spaced repetitions on cued recall: Sufficient but not necessary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 94–105. doi: 10.1037/a0034055 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yazdani, M. A. , Zebrowski, E. (2006). Spaced reinforcement: An effective approach to enhance the achievement in plane geometry. Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Mathematics Education, 1, 37–43. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Young, D. R. , Bellezza, F. S. (1982). Encoding variability, memory organization, and the repetition effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 545–559. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.8.6.545 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar