Skip to main content
Research Spotlight

How Do Delusion-Prone Individuals Respond to Disconfirmatory Evidence?

Improving Comprehension of the Beads Task May Help

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000333

Abstract. Research employing the beads task suggests that people with delusional tendencies over-adjust to disconfirmatory evidence compared to low-delusion-prone individuals. This interpretation is in tension with studies using the bias against disconfirmatory evidence (BADE) task, which provide evidence that people with delusional tendencies are less receptive to disconfirmatory evidence. It has been suggested that over-adjustment on the beads task may be driven by miscomprehension of the task. The current preliminary study aimed to minimize miscomprehension on the beads task and determine how high-delusion-prone people respond to disconfirmatory evidence on both tasks. Fifty-one undergraduate participants completed the BADE task and an adapted version of the beads task. We expected that corrective feedback on the beads task would reduce miscomprehension, and that high-delusion-prone participants would be less receptive to disconfirmatory evidence on both tasks. Our results suggest this version of the beads task improved rates of comprehension relative to previous research. However, we found no evidence that the high-delusion-prone group demonstrated elevated over-adjustment or belief inflexibility in either task. The theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.

References

  • Balzan, R. P., Delfabbro, P. H., Galletly, C. A. & Woodward, T. S. (2012). Over-adjustment or miscomprehension? A re-examination of the jumping to conclusions bias. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 46, 532–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867411435291 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buchy, L., Woodward, T. S. & Liotti, M. (2007). A cognitive bias against disconfirmatory evidence (BADE) is associated with schizotypy. Schizophrenia Research, 90, 334–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2006.11.012 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fine, C., Gardner, M., Craigie, J. & Gold, I. (2007). Hopping, skipping or jumping to conclusions? Clarifying the role of the JTC bias in delusions. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 12, 46–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546800600750597 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Galbraith, N. & Manktelow, K. (2015). A psychological model of delusional belief: Integrating reasoning biases with perceptual, self-concept and emotional factors. In N. D. GalbraithEd., Aberrant beliefs and reasoning (pp. 7–33). Hove, UK: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Garety, P. A., Hemsley, D. R. & Wessely, S. (1991). Reasoning in deluded schizophrenic and paranoid patients. Biases in performance on a probabilistic inference task. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 179, 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199104000-00003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huq, S. F., Garety, P. A. & Hemsley, D. R. (1988). Probabilistic judgements in deluded and non-deluded subjects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 40, 801–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748808402300 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Khandaker, G. M., Barnett, J. H., White, I. R. & Jones, P. B. (2011). A quantitative meta-analysis of population based studies of premorbid intelligence and schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 132, 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2011.06.017 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McLean, B. F., Mattiske, J. K. & Balzan, R. P. (2017). Association of the jumping to conclusions and evidence integration biases with delusions in psychosis: A detailed meta-analytic approach. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 43, 344–354. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbw056 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McLean, B. F., Mattiske, J. K. & Balzan, R. P. (2018). Towards a reliable repeated-measures beads task. Manuscript submitted for publication. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Menon, M., Quilty, L. C., Zawadzki, J. A., Woodward, T. S., Sokolowski, H. M., Boon, H. S. & Wong, A. H. (2013). The role of cognitive biases and personality variables in subclinical delusional ideation. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 18, 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2012.692873 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moritz, S. & Woodward, T. S. (2005). Jumping to conclusions in delusional and non-delusional schizophrenic patients. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44(Pt 2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466505X35678 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peters, E., Joseph, S., Day, S. & Garety, P. (2004). Measuring delusional ideation: The 21-item Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI). Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30, 1005–1022. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007116 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ross, R. M., McKay, R., Coltheart, M. & Langdon, R. (2015). Jumping to conclusions about the beads task? A meta-analysis of delusional ideation and data-gathering. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 41, 1183–1191. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbu187 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sanford, N., Veckenstedt, R., Moritz, S., Balzan, R. P. & Woodward, T. S. (2014). Impaired integration of disambiguating evidence in delusional schizophrenia patients. Psychological Medicine, 44, 2729–2738. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714000397 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van der Leer, L., Hartig, B., Goldmanis, M. & McKay, R. (2015). Delusion proneness and “jumping to conclusions”: relative and absolute effects. Psychological Medicine, 45, 1253–1262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714002359 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Warman, D. M., Lysaker, P. H., Martin, J. M., Davis, L. & Haudenschield, S. L. (2007). Jumping to conclusions and the continuum of delusional beliefs. Behavior Research and Therapy, 45, 1255–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2006.09.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wechsler, D. (2001). Wechsler test for adult reading. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Woodward, T. S., Buchy, L., Moritz, S. & Liotti, M. (2007). A bias against disconfirmatory evidence is associated with delusion proneness in a nonclinical sample. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 33, 1023–1028. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbm013 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zawadzki, J. A., Woodward, T. S., Sokolowski, H. M., Boon, H. S., Wong, A. H. & Menon, M. (2012). Cognitive factors associated with subclinical delusional ideation in the general population. Psychiatry Research, 197, 345–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2012.01.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar