Skip to main content
Review Article

Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How?

A Specification-Curve and Multiverse-Analysis Approach to Meta-Analysis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357

Abstract. Which data to analyze, and how, are fundamental questions of all empirical research. As there are always numerous flexibilities in data-analytic decisions (a “garden of forking paths”), this poses perennial problems to all empirical research. Specification-curve analysis and multiverse analysis have recently been proposed as solutions to these issues. Building on the structural analogies between primary data analysis and meta-analysis, we transform and adapt these approaches to the meta-analytic level, in tandem with combinatorial meta-analysis. We explain the rationale of this idea, suggest descriptive and inferential statistical procedures, as well as graphical displays, provide code for meta-analytic practitioners to generate and use these, and present a fully worked real example from digit ratio (2D:4D) research, totaling 1,592 meta-analytic specifications. Specification-curve and multiverse meta-analysis holds promise to resolve conflicting meta-analyses, contested evidence, controversial empirical literatures, and polarized research, and to mitigate the associated detrimental effects of these phenomena on research progress.

References

  • Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2001). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science, 12, 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00366 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, C. A., Shibuya, A., Ihori, N., Swing, E. L., Bushman, B. J., Sakamoto, A., … Saleem, M. (2010). Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in Eastern and Western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018251 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Babková Durdiaková, J., Celec, P., Koborová, I., Sedláčková, T., Minárik, G., & Ostatníková, D. (2017). How do we love? Romantic love style in men is related to lower testosterone levels. Physiological Research, 66, 695–703. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bakkensen, L. A., & Larson, W. D. (2014). Population matters when modeling hurricane fatalities [Letter to the editor]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, E5331–E5332. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1417030111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berenbaum, S. A., & Beltz, A. M. (2011). Sexual differentiation of human behavior: Effects of prenatal and pubertal organizational hormones. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 32, 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2011.03.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Breedlove, S. M. (2010). Organizational hypothesis: Instances of the fingerpost. Endocrinology, 151, 4116–4122. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2010-0041 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, G. R., Cross, C. P., Street, S. E., & Brand, C. O. (2014). Comment: Beyond “evolutionary versus social”: Moving the cycle shift debate forward. Emotion Review, 6, 250–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914523050 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Butovskaya, M. L., Vasilyev, V. A., Lazebny, O. E., Burkova, V. N., Kulikov, A. M., Mabulla, A., … Ryskov, A. P. (2012). Aggression, digit ratio, and variation in the androgen receptor, serotonin transporter, and dopamine D4 receptor genes in African foragers: The Hadza. Behavior Genetics, 42, 647–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-012-9533-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chang, S., Skakkebæk, A., Trolle, C., Bojesen, A., Hertz, J. M., Cohen, A., … Gravholt, C. H. (2015). Anthropometry in Klinefelter syndrome: Multifactorial influences due to CAG length, testosterone treatment and possibly intrauterine hypogonadism. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 100, E508–E517. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-2834 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cheng, F., Zhao, J., Lu, H., Liu, D., & Liu, L. (2016). The association of the digit ratio and androgen receptor gene CAG polymorphism in patients with premature ovarian failure [in Chinese]. Journal of Ningxia Medical University, 38, 856–859, 867. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Christensen, B., & Christensen, S. (2014). Are female hurricanes really deadlier than male hurricanes? [Letter to the editor]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, E3497–E3498. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1410910111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen-Bendahan, C. C. C., van de Beek, C., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2005). Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behavior: Methods and findings. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 29, 353–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.11.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Naeyer, H., Bogaert, V., De Spaey, A., Roef, G., Vandewalle, S., Derave, W., … Kaufman, J. M. (2014). Genetic variations in the androgen receptor are associated with steroid concentrations and anthropometrics but not with muscle mass in healthy young men. PLoS One, 9, e86235. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086235 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Durdiaková, J., Celec, P., Laznibatová, J., Minárik, G., Lakatošová, S., Kubranská, A., & Ostatníková, D. (2015). Differences in salivary testosterone, digit ratio and empathy between intellectually gifted and control boys. Intelligence, 48, 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.11.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Durdiaková, J., Celec, P., Laznibatová, J., Minárik, G., & Ostatníková, D. (2016). Testosterone metabolism: A possible biological underpinning of non-verbal IQ in intellectually gifted girls. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 76, 66–74. https://doi.org/10.21307/ane-2017-006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Durdiaková, J., Lakatošová, S., Kubranská, A., Laznibatová, J., Ficek, A., Ostatníková, D., & Celec, P. (2013). Mental rotation in intellectually gifted boys is affected by the androgen receptor CAG repeat polymorphism. Neuropsychologia, 94, 1693–1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.05.016 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ferguson, C. J. (2007a). Evidence for publication bias in video game violence effects literature: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 470–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2007.01.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ferguson, C. J. (2007b). The good, the bad and the ugly: A meta-analytic review of positive and negative effects of violent video games. Psychiatric Quarterly, 78, 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-007-9056-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ferguson, C. J. (2014). Comment: Why meta-analyses rarely resolve ideological debates. Emotion Review, 6, 251–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914523046 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ferguson, C. J. (2015). Do angry birds make for angry children? A meta-analysis of video game influences on children’s and adolescents’ aggression, mental health, prosocial behavior, and academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 646–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615592234 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Folland, J. P., McCauley, T. M., Phypers, C., Hanson, B., & Mastana, S. S. (2012). Relationship of 2D:4D finger ratio with muscle strength, testosterone, and androgen receptor CAG repeat genotype. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 148, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22044 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (2014). The statistical crisis in science. American Scientist, 102, 460–465. https://doi.org/10.1511/2014.111.460 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gignac, G. E., & Bates, T. C. (2017). Brain volume and intelligence: The moderating role of intelligence measurement quality. Intelligence, 64, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.06.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014a). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1205–1259. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035438 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014b). Meta-analyses and p-curves support robust cycle shifts in women’s mate preferences: Reply to Wood and Carden (2014) and Harris, Pashler, and Mickes (2014). Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1272–1280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037714 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goodyear-Smith, F. A., van Driel, M. L., Arroll, B., & Del Mar, C. (2012). Analysis of decisions made in meta-analyses of depression screening and the risk of confirmation bias: A case study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12, 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-76 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greitemeyer, T., & Mügge, D. O. (2014). Video games do affect social outcomes: A meta-analytic review of the effects of violent and prosocial video game play. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 578–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213520459 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Habre, C., Tramèr, M. R., Pöpping, D. M., & Elia, N. (2014). Ability of a meta-analysis to prevent redundant research: Systematic review of studies on pain from propofol injection. British Medical Journal, 349, g5219. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g5219 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hampson, E., & Sankar, J. S. (2012). Re-examining the Manning hypothesis: Androgen receptor polymorphism and the 2D:4D digit ratio. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 557–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.02.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harris, C. R., Pashler, H., & Mickes, L. (2014). Elastic analysis procedures: An incurable (but preventable) problem in the fertility effect literature. Comment on Gildersleeve, Haselton, and Fales (2014). Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1260–1264. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036478 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hennig, J., & Rammsayer, T. (2007). Research on 2D:4D: A promising challenge for the study of individual differences [Editorial]. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 53–54. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.28.2.53 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Hines, M. (2010). Sex-related variation in human behavior and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 448–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.07.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hines, M. (2011). Gender development and the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34, 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113654 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, B. (2018). Fake facts and alternative truths in medical research. BMC Medical Ethics, 19, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0243-z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hönekopp, J. (2013). No evidence that 2D:4D is related to the number of CAG repeats in the androgen receptor gene. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 4, 185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2013.00185 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hönekopp, J., & Watson, S. (2010). Meta-analysis of digit ratio 2D:4D shows greater sex difference in the right hand. American Journal of Human Biology, 22, 619–630. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hurd, P. L., Vaillancourt, K. L., & Dinsdale, N. L. (2011). Aggression, digit ratio and variation in androgen receptor and monoamine oxidase A genes in men. Behavior Genetics, 41, 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-010-9404-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hyde, J. S., & Salk, R. H. (2014). Comment: Menstrual cycle fluctuations in women’s mate preferences. Emotion Review, 6, 253–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914523049 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta‐analyses. Milbank Quarterly, 94, 485–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12210 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, B. C. (2014). Comment: Alternatives to Wood et al.’s conclusions. Emotion Review, 6, 254–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914523048 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jung, K., Shavitt, S., Viswanathan, M., & Hilbe, J. M. (2014a). Female hurricanes are deadlier than male hurricanes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 8782–8787. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1402786111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jung, K., Shavitt, S., Viswanathan, M., & Hilbe, J. M. (2014b). Reply to Bakkensen and Larson: Population may matter but does not alter conclusions [Letter to the editor]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, E5333. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419330111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jung, K., Shavitt, S., Viswanathan, M., & Hilbe, J. M. (2014c). Reply to Christensen and Christensen and to Malter: Pitfalls of erroneous analyses of hurricanes names [Letter to the editor]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,111, E3499–E3500. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411652111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jung, K., Shavitt, S., Viswanathan, M., & Hilbe, J. M. (2014d). Reply to Maley: Yes, appropriate modeling of fatality counts confirms female hurricanes are deadlier [Letter to the editor]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, E3835. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414111111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kahneman, D. (2003). Experiences of collaborative research. American Psychologist, 58, 723–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.723 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Knickmeyer, R. C., Woolson, S., Hamer, R. M., Konneker, T., & Gilmore, J. H. (2011). 2D:4D ratios in the first 2 years of life: Stability and relation to testosterone exposure and sensitivity. Hormones and Behavior, 60, 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.05.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kubranská, A., Lakatošová, S., Schmidtová, E., Durdiaková, J., Celec, P., & Ostatníková, D. (2014). Spatial abilities are not related to testosterone levels and variation in the androgen receptor in healthy young men. General Physiology and Biophysics, 33, 311–319. https://doi.org/10.4149/gpb_2014005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kühberger, A., Scherndl, T., Ludwig, B., & Simon, D. M. (2016). Comparative evaluation of narrative reviews and meta-analyses: A case study. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224, 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000250 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Latourelle, S. M., Elwess, N. L., & Elwess, J. M. (2008). Finger forecasting: A pointer to athletic prowess in women – a preliminary investigation by an undergraduate biology class. American Biology Teacher, 70, 411–414. https://doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685(2008)70[411:FFAPTA]2.0.CO;2 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Loehlin, J. C., Medland, S. E., & Martin, N. G. (2012). Is CAG sequence length in the androgen receptor gene correlated with finger-length ratio? Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 224–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.09.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maley, S. (2014). Statistics show no evidence of gender bias in the public’s hurricane preparedness [Letter to the editor]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, E3834. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1413079111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Malter, D. (2014). Female hurricanes are not deadlier than male hurricanes [Letter to the editor]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, E3496. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411428111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manning, J. T., Bundred, P. E., Newton, D. J., & Flanagan, B. F. (2003). The second to fourth digit ratio and variation in the androgen receptor gene. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 399–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00052-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Wilson, J., & Lewis-Jones, D. I. (1998). The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: A predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Human Reproduction, 13, 3000–3004. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.11.3000 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mas, M., Alonso, C., Hernandez, P., Fernandez, M., Gutierrez, P., Salido, E., & Baez, D. (2009). Androgen receptor CAG and GGN polymorphisms and 2D:4D finger ratio in male to female transsexuals [Abstract]. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6(Suppl. 5), 419–420. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McDaniel, M. A. (2005). Big-brained people are smarter: A meta-analysis of the relationship between in vivo brain volume and intelligence. Intelligence, 33, 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2004.11.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Naudet, F., Schuit, E., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). Overlapping network meta-analyses on the same topic: Survey of published studies. International Journal of Epidemiology, 46, 1999–2008. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyx138 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J., & Simonsohn, U. (2018). Psychology’s renaissance. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 511–534. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011836 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Olkin, I., Dahabreh, I. J., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2012). GOSH: A graphical display of study heterogeneity. Research Synthesis Methods, 3, 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1053 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Patel, C. J., Burford, B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2015). Assessment of vibration of effects due to model specification can demonstrate the instability of observational associations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68, 1046–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.029 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pietschnig, J., Penke, L., Wicherts, J. M., Zeiler, M., & Voracek, M. (2015). Meta-analysis of associations between human brain volume and intelligence differences: How strong are they and what do they mean? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 57, 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.09.017 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rohrer, J. M., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2017). Probing birth-order effects on narrow traits using specification-curve analysis. Psychological Science, 28, 1821–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617723726 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schild, A. H. E., & Voracek, M. (2015). Finding your way out of the forest without a trail of breadcrumbs: Development and evaluation of two novel displays of forest plots. Research Synthesis Methods, 6, 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1125 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E. C., … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many analysts, one dataset: Making transparent how variations in analytical choices affect results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). A 21 word solution. Dialogue, 26, 4–7. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2160588 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. Retrieved from http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, G. (2016). Hurricane names: A bunch of hot air? Weather and Climate Extremes, 12, 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2015.11.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing transparency through a multiverse analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, A. E., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Triangulating meta-analyses: The example of the serotonin transporter gene, stressful life events and major depression. BMC Psychology, 4, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0129-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tsuji, S., Bergmann, C., & Cristia, A. (2014). Community-augmented meta-analyses: Toward cumulative data assessment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 661–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614552498 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Anders, S. M. (2014). Comment: The social neuroendocrinology example: Incorporating culture resolves biobehavioral evolutionary paradoxes. Emotion Review, 6, 256–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914523047 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Voracek, M. (2011). Special issue preamble: Digit ratio (2D:4D) and individual differences research. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 367–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.018 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Voracek, M. (2014). No effects of androgen receptor gene CAG and GGC repeat polymorphisms on digit ratio (2D:4D): A comprehensive meta-analysis and critical evaluation of research. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 430–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.05.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Voracek, M., Kaden, A., Kossmeier, M., Pietschnig, J., & Tran, U. S. (2018). Meta-analysis shows associations of digit ratio (2D:4D) and transgender identity are small at best. Endocrine Practice, 24, 386–390. https://doi.org/10.4158/EP-2017-0024 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Voracek, M., & Loibl, L. M. (2009). Scientometric analysis and bibliography of digit ratio (2D:4D) research, 1998–2008. Psychological Reports, 104, 922–956. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.104.3.922-956 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Voracek, M., Pietschnig, J., Nader, I. W., & Stieger, S. (2011). Digit ratio (2D:4D) and sex-role orientation: Further evidence and meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Voracek, M., Tran, U. S., & Dressler, S. G. (2010). Digit ratio (2D:4D) and sensation seeking: New data and meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.019 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Warrington, N. M., Shevroja, E., Hemani, G., Hysi, P. G., Jiang, Y., Auton, A., … Evans, D. M. (2018). Genome-wide association study identifies nine novel loci for 2D:4D finger ratio, a putative retrospective biomarker of testosterone exposure in utero. Human Molecular Genetics, 27, 2025–2038. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddy121 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & Bouwman, J. (2016). The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wood, W. (2014). Author reply: Once again, menstrual cycles and mate preferences. Emotion Review, 6, 258–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914523053 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wood, W., & Carden, L. (2014). Elusiveness of menstrual cycle effects on mate preferences: Comment on Gildersleeve, Haselton, and Fales (2014). Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1265–1271. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036722 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wood, W., Kressel, L., Joshi, P. D., & Louie, B. (2014). Meta-analysis of menstrual cycle effects on women’s mate preferences. Emotion Review, 6, 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914523073 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Young, C. (2018). Model uncertainty and the crisis in science. Socius. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117737206 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Young, C., & Holsteen, K. (2017). Model uncertainty and robustness: A computational framework for multimodel analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 46, 3–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115610347 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang, C., Dang, J., Pei, L., Guo, M., Zhu, H., Qu, L., … Huo, Z. (2013). Relationship of 2D:4D finger ratio with androgen receptor CAG and GGN repeat polymorphism. American Journal of Human Biology, 25, 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.22347 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang, C., Lu, H., Hao, S., Yan, Y., Dang, J., Zheng, L., … Huo, Z. (2016). Relationship between androgen receptor CAG/GGN repeat polymorphisms and the ratio of 2D:4D [in Chinese]. Acta Anatomica Sinica, 47, 409–414. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang, K., Yang, X., Yang, Y., Xue, M., Fang, P., Wang, B., … Gong, P. (2018). Revisiting the relation of ratio of 2D:4D with the androgen receptor (AR) gene and the circulating testosterone levels: Cross-sectional study and meta-analyses. Manuscript submitted for publication First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang, Z., Kossmeier, M., Tran, U. S., Voracek, M., & Zhang, H. (2017). Rainforest plots for the presentation of patient-subgroup analysis in clinical trials. Annals of Translational Medicine, 5, 24. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.10.07 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar