Abstract
This study explored the experiences of work–life balance (WLB) of development nongovernment organization (NGO) workers in the Philippines. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to make sense of the data gathered from semistructured interviews with 6 NGO fieldworkers. Findings surfaced 3 superordinate themes arising from the WLB experiences of NGO workers as (a) work–life synthesis (WLS) rather than WLB characterized by perceiving that work is life, living out one’s calling, and having integrated relationships; (b) challenges disrupting WLS such as heavy and unpredictable workload, unintended spillover, and fatigue; and (c) the presence of both internal and external factors enabling WLS. This study contributes to psychological literature by introducing a new conception of WLB as WLS outside its conventionally associated corporate interpretation. Practical implications of this study include the identification of several enabling and hindering factors affecting the WLS of NGO workers that could be addressed by organizational leaders and/or human resource management units of NGOs.
Impact and Implications
This study looked into the experiences of work–life balance (WLB) among national, nongovernment organization (NGO) development workers in the Philippines. NGOs are private, voluntary social organizations that contribute to social change by empowering the marginalized (Lampauog, 1996). These organizations contribute to the attainment of most, if not all, of the United Nations sustainable development goals at the global and local levels. The sustainable development goals highlight the importance of decent and sustainable work opportunities and conditions as well as the promotion of good health and well-being. However, the wellness of NGO workers seems to take a back seat as resources and efforts of these organizations are directed toward the communities and sectors that they serve (Batti, 2014). This research ascribes to Giri and Ufford’s (2003) notion of the “care of the self” where caring for other people is deemed to be more effectively complemented by caring for the self. It specifically examines the experiences of balancing work and nonwork aspects of an NGO worker’s life as well as the barriers and enablers of achieving WLB. Findings of the study will hopefully orient people management programs that promote workers’ wellness in NGOs.
References
2002). Who cares? The personal and professional problems of NGO fieldworkers in Bangladesh. Development in Practice, 12(2), 177–191. 10.1080/09614520220127694
(2018). Development NGOs: Basic facts. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 89(1), 125–155. 10.1111/apce.12188
(2006).
(The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective . In W. W. PowellR. Steinberg (Eds.), The non-profit sector: A research handbook (pp. 89–114). Yale.2007). Overview of NGOs and civil society: Philippines. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/publications/overview-ngos-and-civil-society-philippines
. (2001). Integrating work and family life: A holistic approach: A report of the Sloan work-family policy network. MIT, Sloan School of Management.
. (2014). Human resource management challenges facing local NGOs. Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(4), 87–95. 10.11648/j.hss.20140204.11
(2003). Mission attachment and satisfaction as factors in employee retention. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 14(1), 5–18. 10.1002/nml.18
(2007). Work and personal life boundary management: Boundary strength, work/personal life balance, and the segmentation-integration continuum. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(4), 365–375. 10.1037/1076-8998.12.4.365
(2018). Executive chefs’ calling: Effect on engagement, work-life balance and life satisfaction. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(5), 2287–2307. 10.1108/IJCHM-02-2017-0105
(2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/life balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747–770. 10.1177/0018726700536001
(2010). Meaningful work? Nonprofit marketization and work/life imbalance in popular autobiographies of social entrepreneurship. Organization, 17(4), 437–459. 10.1177/1350508410364198
(2012). The personal and the professional: Aid workers’ relationships and values in the development process. Third World Quarterly, 33(8), 1387–1404. 10.1080/01436597.2012.698104
(2003).
(Work-family balance . In J. C. QuickL. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (pp. 143–162). American Psychological Association. 10.1037/10474-0072008).
(Phenomenology . In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 26–52). Sage.2003).
(Reconstituting development as a shared responsibility: Ethics, aesthetics and a creative shaping of human possibilities . In P. Q. van UffordA. K. Giri (Eds.), A moral critique of development (pp. 253–278). Routledge.1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. The Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88. 10.5465/amr.1985.4277352
(2003). The relation between work–family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 510–531. 10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00042-8
(2000). Reconceptualizing the work–family interface: An ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 111–126. 10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.111
(2002). Perspectives on the study of work-life balance. Social Sciences Information Information Sur les Sciences Sociales, 41(2), 255–279. 10.1177/0539018402041002005
(2014). Outcomes of work–life balance on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and mental health: A study across seven cultures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 361–373. 10.1016/j.jvb.2014.08.010
(2007). Local democracy under siege: Activism, public interests, and private politics. New York University Press.
(2010). Negotiating the boundaries of voluntarism: Values in the Indian NGO sector. Voluntas, 21(4), 546–568. 10.1007/s11266-010-9154-4
(2008). Work–life balance: A review of the meaning of the balance construct. Journal of Management and Organization, 14(3), 323–327. 10.5172/jmo.837.14.3.323
(2014).
(The sustainable workforce: Organizational strategies for promoting work-life balance and well-being . In C. CooperP. Chen (Eds.), Work and wellbeing (pp. 295–318). Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118539415.wbwell0302009). Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 704–730. 10.5465/amj.2009.43669916
(1996). Philippine development NGO characteristics and their implications on the practice of organization development in NGOs: An exploratory study (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines.
(2016). Work, life and personality: The relationship between the big five personality traits and work-life conflict. South Asian Journal of Management, 23(4), 31–53.
(2007). The constraints of a ‘work–life balance’ approach: An international perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(3), 360–373. 10.1080/09585190601165577
(2015). A longitudinal analysis of work-life balance perspectives of future business professionals. International Journal of Business Excellence, 8(5), 601–631. 10.1504/IJBEX.2015.071273
(2007). Analysing qualitative data in psychology. Sage. 10.4135/9781446207536
(2007). Advancing work—Life integration in individuals, organizations, and communities. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(4), 439–454. 10.1177/1523422307305486
(2017). Perceptions of women academics regarding work–life balance: A Pakistan case. Management in Education, 31(2), 88–93. 10.1177/0892020617696633
(2007). The human organization: Challenges in NGOs and development programmes. Development in Practice, 17(1), 65–77. 10.1080/09614520601092543
(2000). A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(3), 255–277. 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0403_4
(2005). Managing multiple roles: Work–family policies and individuals’ desires for segmentation. Organization Science, 16(3), 243–258. 10.1287/orsc.1050.0124
(1998).
(Introduction . In G. S. SillimanL. G. Noble (Eds.), Organizing for democracy: NGOs, civil society and the Philippine state (pp. 3–18). University of Hawaii Press.1997). NGOS and development assistance: A change in mind-set? Third World Quarterly, 18(3), 563–578. 10.1080/01436599714876
(2007).
(Interpretative phenomenological analysis . In E. LyonsA. Coyle (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology (pp. 35–50). Sage. 10.4135/9781446207536.d102007).
(Interpretative phenomenological analysis . In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53–80). Sage.2001).
(Role theory . In J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 233–254). Springer. 10.1007/0-387-36274-6_122017). Dimensions of work-life balance as predictors of anxiety among a sample of Nigerian bankers. IFE Psychologia, 25(1), 148–168.
(2001). The selfish altruist: Relief work in famine and war. Earthscan.
(2016). Work-life balance among humanitarian aid workers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(6), 1191–1213. 10.1177/0899764016634890
(2014). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method. Open University Press.
(2003).
(Finding positive meaning in work . In K. S. CameronJ. E. DuttonR. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 296–308). Berrett-Koehler.2012).
(Callings . In K. S. CameronG. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 45–55). Oxford University Press.