Exchanging the Generic Masculine for Gender- Balanced Forms - The Impact of Context Valence
Abstract
Research on the generic masculine (i.e., male nouns used in gender-overlapping or gender-abstracting way) and its alternatives has repeatedly revealed that in German the generic masculine is more strongly associated with male persons than other types of generic. As research has only been done in positive or neutral contexts we extended a study by Stahlberg et al. (2001, Experiment 1) to test whether the results can be generalized across valences. The experiment (N = 156) revealed that gender-balancing forms are more frequently associated with women than the generic masculine. This held especially true for male participants. With reference to the valence manipulation female participants tended to show asymmetric ingroup favoritism whereas male participants’ preference for same sex associations was indifferent to the valence manipulation. Results are discussed in light of cognitive and motivational consequences of the different generics.
References
Braun, F. (1996). Das große I und seine Schwestern - eine kritische Bewertung [The capital I and its sisters - a critical evaluation]. Deutschunterricht, 48(1), 54– 62Braun, F. , Gottburgsen, A. , Sczesny, S. , Stahlberg, D. (1998). Können Geophysiker Frauen sein? Generische Personenbezeichnungen im Deutschen [Can geophysicians be women? Generic terms in German]. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 26, 265– 283Brown, R. (2000). Social Identity Theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745– 778Eagly, A. H. , Mladinic, A. (1993). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes and judgments of competence. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 5), (1-35). New York: WileyGlick, P. , Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491– 512Heise, E. (2000). Sind Frauen mitgemeint? Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Verständnis des generischen Maskulinums und seiner Alternativen [Are women included? An empirical study of the generic masculine and its alternatives]. Sprache & Kognition, 19(1-2), 3– 13Heise, E. (2003). Auch einfühlsame Studenten sind Männer: Das generische Maskulinum und die mentale Repräsentation von Personen [Sensitive students are men too: The generic masculine and the mental representation of persons]. Verhaltenstherapie und psychosoziale Praxis, 35(2), 285– 291Irmen, L. , Köhncke, A. (1996). Zur Psychologie des “generischen“ Maskulinums [The psychology of the “generic“ masculine]. Sprache & Kognition, 15(3), 152– 166Mummendey, A. (1992). Categorization is not enough: Intergroup discrimination in negative outcome allocation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28(2), 125– 144Otten, S. , Mummendey, A. , Blanz, M. (1996). Intergroup discrimination in positive and negative outcome allocations: Impact of stimulus valence, relative group status, and relative group size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(6), 568– 581Otten, S. , Wentura, D. (2001). Self-anchoring and ingroup favoritism: An individual profile analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 525– 532Peyer, A. , Wyss, E. L. (1998). “JazzmusikerInnen - weder Asketen noch Müesli-Fifis”. Feministische Sprachkritik in der Schweiz, ein Überblick [“Jazz-musicians - neither ascetics nor cereals-picker“ - Feministic language critic in Switzerland, a review]. Germanistische Linguistik, 139-140, 117– 154Rothermund, K. (1998). Automatische geschlechtsspezifische Assoziationen beim Lesen von Texten mit geschlechtseindeutigen und generisch maskulinen Text-Subjekten [Automatic gender-specific associations to texts containing gender-specific and masculine generic text subjects]. Sprache & Kognition, 17(4), 183– 198Rothmund, J. , Scheele, B. (2004). Personenbezeichnungsmodelle auf dem Prüfstand. Lösungsmöglichkeiten für das Genus-Sexus-Problem auf Textebene [Putting gender-neutral reference terms to the test: Constructive solutions to the problem of grammatical vs. referential gender on the textual level]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 212(1), 40– 54Scheele, B. , Gauler, E. (1993). Wählen Wissenschaftler ihre Probleme anders aus als WissenschaftlerInnen? Das Genus-Sexus-Problem als paradigmatischer Fall der linguistischen Relativitätsthese [Do male and female scientists differ in their selection of research problems? The problem of gender-sex bias as a paradigmatic example of linguistic relativity]. Sprache & Kognition, 12(2), 59– 72Stahlberg, D. , Sczesny, S. (2001). Effekte des generischen Maskulinums und alternativer Sprachformen auf den gedanklichen Einbezug von Frauen [Effects of the generic use of the masculine pronoun and alternative forms of speech on the cognitive visibility of women]. Psychologische Rundschau, 52(3), 131– 140Stahlberg, D. , Sczesny, S. , Braun, F. (2001). Name your favourite musician: Effects of masculine generics and of their alternatives in German. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20(4), 464– 469Steffens, M. C. , Mecklenbräuker, S. , Buchner, A. , Mehl, B. (2004). On the bounded rationality of gender stereotyping in fame judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 397– 406Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1– 39
