Effects of Facial Attractiveness, Gender, and Competence of Applicants on Job Recruitment
Abstract
Many studies have shown that physical appearance has a strong effect on hiring decisions, but they have not simultaneously taken into account the applicant’s competence, the hierarchical status, and job sex type. Recruiters rated the hireability, utility, and desirability of eight applicants based on their resumes, which varied according to a 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 design with four within-subject variables (Gender × Attractiveness × High/Moderate Competence, Male/Female Sex-Typed Jobs) and one between-subjects variable (hierarchical status of the job: managerial/nonmanagerial). An univariate, repeated-measures analysis conducted on the composite score showed a main effect of attractiveness and competence. Globally, decision-makers gave more favorable ratings for male sex-typed jobs than for female sex-typed jobs and for low-status jobs than for high-status jobs. Attractiveness and competence had a more disadvantageous effect for female than for male sex-typed jobs.
References
Ahearne, M., Gueren, T., Burke-Jarvis, C. (1999). If looks could sell: Moderation and mediation of the attractiveness effect on salesperson performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16, 269– 284Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., Wesman, A. G. (1990). Differential aptitude test. (5th ed). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological CorporationCambon, L. (2006). Social desirability and social utility: Two evaluative dimensions of personality traits. International Review of Social Psychology, 19, 125– 149Cash, T. F., Gillen, B., Burns, D. S. (1977). Sexism and “beautyism” in personnel consultant decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 301– 311Cash, T. F., Kilcullen, R. N. (1985). The eyes of the beholder: Susceptibility to sexism and beautyism in the evaluation of managerial applicants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 591– 605Desrumaux, P. (2005). Normative and stereotypic pieces of information: Effects of internality/externality, gender, physical appearance, and position level and sex-type of the job on hiring decisions. International Review of Social Psychology, 18, 165– 199Desrumaux-Zagrodnicki, P. (2001). Recrutement, critères valides et norme d’internalité: Effet de l’expérience professionnelle, de l’essai professionnel, de l’aptitude et du mode d’explications des candidats sur les décisions d’embauche [Recruitment, valid criteria, and internality norm: The effects of applicants’ experience, professional trying, aptitude and causal explanations on hiring decisions]. Le Travail Humain, 64, 343– 362Desrumaux-Zagrodnicki, P., Léoni, V., Masclet, G. (2003). Effets de l’internalité/externalité et de l’apparence physique de candidats masculins pour des postes subalternes et supérieurs. [Effects of internality/externality and physical appearance of male applicants on hiring decisions for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs]. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 59, 30– 39Desrumaux-Zagrodnicki, P., Masclet, G., Poignet, H., Sterckeman, L. (2000). Influence de l’apparence physique et des explications causales des candidats sur les décisions de recruteurs pour des postes de statuts supérieurs et subalternes [Effects of applicants’ physical appearance and causal explanations on hiring decisions for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs]. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 48, 131– 142Desrumaux-Zagrodnicki, P., Rainis, N. (2000). Recruitment for a manager position by regard to applicants’ causal explanations and applicants’ aptitudes. International Review of Social Psychology, 13, 203– 224Dion, K. K., Berscheid, E., Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285– 290Dipboye, R. L., Arvey, R. D., Terpstra, D. E. (1977). Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resume evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 288– 294Drogosz, L. M., Lévy, P. E. (1996). Another look at the effects of appearance, gender, and job type on performance-based decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 437– 445Dubois, M., Pansu, P. (2004). Facial attractiveness, applicants’ qualifications, and judges’ expertise about decisions in pre-selective recruitment. Psychological Reports, 95, 1129– 1134Dubois, N. (2005). Social judgment norms and value: Anchoring in utility and anchoring to desirability. International Review of Social Psychology, 18, 43– 79Dubois, N., Beauvois, J.-L. (2001). Désirabilité et utilité: Deux composantes de la valeur des personnes dans l’évaluation sociale. [Utility and desirability: Two components of the person’s value in social evaluation]. L’Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 30, 391– 405Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but...: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109– 128Gillen, B., Sherman, R. C. (1980). Physical attractiveness and sex as determinants of trait attributions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 15, 423– 437Glick, P., Larsen, S., Johnson, C., Branstiter, H. (2005). Evaluations of sexy women in low- and high-status jobs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 389– 395Heilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269– 298Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., Martell, R. F., Simon, M. C. (1989). Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 935– 942Heilman, M. E., Saruwatari, L. R. (1979). When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 360– 372Heilman, M. E., Stopeck, M. H. (1985). Being attractive: Advantage or disadvantage? Performance-based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of appearance, sex and job type. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 35, 202– 215Jackson, L. A., Hunter, J. E., Hodge, C. N. (1995). Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence: A meta-analytic review. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 108– 122Jawahar, I. M., Mattsson, J. (2005). Sexism and beautyism effects in selection as function of self-monitoring level of decision maker. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 563– 573Landy, D., Sigall, H. (1974). Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer’s physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 299– 304Maisonneuve, J., Bruchon-Schweitzer, M. (1999). Le corps et la beauté. [The body and the beauty]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de FranceMarlowe, C. M., Schneider, S. L., Nelson, C. E. (1996). Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring decisions: Are more experienced managers less biased?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 11– 21Marshall, G. W., Stamps, M. B., Moore, J. N. (1998). Preinterview biases: The impact of race, physical attractiveness, and sales job type on preinterview impressions of sales job applicants. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 18, 21– 38Moore, J. N. (1998). An investigation of sales managers’ preinterview biases: The impact of sales job type and applicants’ race, gender, and physical attractiveness on preinterview impressions. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58 (8-A), 3221–Morrow, P. C., McElroy, J. C., Stamper, B. G., Wilson, M. A. (1990). The effects of physical attractiveness and other demographic characteristics on promotion decisions. Journal of Management, 16, 723– 736Pansu, P., Dubois, M. (2002). The effects of face attractiveness on pre-selective recruitment. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 61, 15– 20Polinko, N. K. (2000). An examination of person-job fit: The effects of physical attractiveness and job type on organizational selection. Dissertation Abstracts International: The Sciences and Engineering, 60, 4946–Rosenkrantz, P. S., Vogel, S. R., Bee, H., Broverman, I. K., Broverman, D. M. (1968). Sex-roles stereotypes and self concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32, 287– 295Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262– 274Webster, M., Driskell, J. E. (1983). Beauty as status. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 140– 165Zelditch, M. (1985). Three questions about status. In J. Berger and M. Zelditch (Eds.), Status, rewards, and influence (pp. 73-107). San Francisco: Jossey-BassZuckerman, M., Miyake, K., Elkin, C. S. (1995). Effects of attractiveness and maturity of face and voice on interpersonal impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 253– 272