Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Communication

Are Some Rabbits More Competent and Warm Than Others?

The Lay Epistemologist Is Interested in Object Value, Not in Descriptive Parameters

Published Online:May 02, 2011https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000040

Abstract

Two theories are compared with respect to their ability to explain the emergence of two dimensions in psychological descriptions of human beings. For psychological realism, the two dimensions are assumed to be two realities existing in a descriptive (quasiscientific) psychology. Psychological descriptions are considered to be real descriptions of people’s personality; for the evaluative approach, the two dimensions are seen as two aspects of people’s social value. The psychological descriptions are considered direct expressions of a person’s social value. The results of three studies in which students were asked to give psychological descriptions of pet rabbits supported the evaluative approach. They showed (1) that a human psychological reality is not a prerequisite for the emergence of either dimension, and (2) that information about the social value of rabbits (social desirability and social utility) is enough to make the two dimensions appear.

References

  • Abele, A. E., Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bachelard, G. (1938). La formation de l’esprit scientifique [The formation of the scientific mind]. Paris, France: Vrin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bachelard, G. (1953). Le matérialisme rationnel [Rational materialism]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beauvois, J.-L. (1976). Problématique des conduites sociales d’évaluation [The epistemology of social evaluation]. Connexions, 19, 7–30. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beauvois, J.-L. (1995). La connaissance des utilités sociales [The knowledge of social utilities]. Psychologie Française, 40, 375–387. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beauvois, J.-L. (2005). Les illusions libérales, individualisme et pouvoir social [Liberal illusions, individualism, and social power]. Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beauvois, J.-L., Dépret, E. (2008). What about social value? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23, 493–500. doi: 10.1007/BF03172755 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beauvois, J.-L., Dubois, N. (1992). Traits as evaluative categories. Current Psychology of Cognition, 12, 253–270. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beauvois, J.-L., Dubois, N. (2000). Affordances in social judgment: Experimental proof of why it is a mistake to ignore how others behave toward a target and look solely at how the target behaves. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 59, 16–33. doi:10.1024/ 1421–0185.59.1.16 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Beauvois, J.-L., Dubois, N. (2008). Deux dimensions du jugement personnologique: approche évaluative versus approche psychologique [Two dimensions of personnological judgment: Evaluative approach versus descriptive approach]. Psychologia Sociala, 21, 105–119. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beauvois, J.-L., Dubois, N. (2009). Lay psychology and the social value of persons. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 1082–1095. doi: 10.1111/j.1751–9004.2009.00225.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bourne, E. (1977). Can we describe an individual’s personality? Agreement on stereotype versus individual attributes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 863–872. doi.org/ 10.1037/0022–3514.35.12.863 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cambon, L. (2004). La désirabilité sociale et l’utilité sociale des professions et des professionnels [Social desirability and social utility of jobs and professionals]. In J.-L. Beauvois, R.-V. Joule, J.-M. Monteil (Eds.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales volume (Vol. 9, pp. 187–212). Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cambon, L. (2006). Désirabilité sociale et utilité sociale, deux dimensions de la valeur communiquée par les adjectifs de personnalité [Social desirability and social utility, two dimensions of value given by personality traits]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 19, 125–151. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cambon, L. (2007, April). Désirabilité et utilité sociale: Deux dimensions du jugement social [Social desirability and social utility: Two dimensions of social judgment]. Paper presented at the meeting “35 ans de psychologie sociale avec Jean-Léon Beauvois,” Paris, France. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cambon, L., Djouari, A., Beauvois, J.-L. (2006). Social judgment norms and social utility: When it is more valuable to be useful than desirable. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 167–180. doi: 10.1024/1421–0185.65.3.167 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Cassignol-Bertrand, F., Baldet, S., Louche, C., Papet, J. (2006). Norme de motivation intrinsèque et utilité sociale: Recherches dans le champ organizationnel [Intrinsic motivation norm and social utility: Studies in organizations]. Psychologie du Travail et des Organizations, 12, 339–349. doi: org/10.1016/j.pto. 2006.09.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cattell, R. B. (1957). Personality and motivation: Structure and measurement. New York: World Book. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cislak, A., Wojciszke, B. (2008). Agency and communion are inferred from actions serving interests of self or others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1103–1110. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.554 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Darnon, C., Dompnier, B., Delmas, F., Pulfrey, C., Butera, F. (2009). Achievement goal promotion at university: Social desirability and social utility of mastery and performance goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 119–134. doi: 10.1037/a0012824 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Devos-Comby, L., Devos, T. (2001). Social norms and judgments of responsibility. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 60, 35–58. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Dompnier, B., Pansu, P., Bressoux, P. (2007). Social utility, social desirability, and scholastic judgments: Toward a personological model of academic evaluation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 333–350. doi: 10.1007/BF03173572 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dubois, N. (2005). Normes sociales de jugement et valeur: Ancrage sur l’utilité et ancrage sur la désirabilité [Social judgment norms and value: Anchoring in utility and anchoring in desirability]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 18, 43–79. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dubois, N. (2006). La valeur sociale des personnes [The social value of persons]. In R.-V. Joule, P. Huguet (Eds.), Bilan et perspectives en psychologie sociale (Vol. 1, pp. 81–115). Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dubois, N. (2010). Theory of the social value of persons applied to organizations: Typologies of “good” leaders and recruitment. European Review of Applied Psychology, 60, 255–266. doi: 10.1016/j.erap.2010.01.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dubois, N., Beauvois, J.-L. (2001). Désirabilité et utilité: Deux composantes de la valeur des personnes dans l’évaluation sociale [Desirability and utility: Two components of value in social evaluation]. Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 30, 391–405. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dubois, N., Beauvois, J.-L. (2005). Normativeness and individualism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 123–146. doi:10.1002/ejsp.236 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C. (2006). Stereotype content and relative group status across cultures. In S. Guimond (Ed.), Social comparison processes and levels of analysis: Understanding culture, intergroup relations, and cognition (pp. 249–263). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social perception: Warmth, then competence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 77–83. doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T., Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fromm, E. (1956). The sane society. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gosling, S. D. (2001). From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychological Bulletin, 127, 45–86. doi: 10.I037//0033–2909.I27.1.45 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gosling, S. D., Bonnenburg, A. V. (1998). An integrative approach to personality research in anthrozoology: Ratings of six species of pets and their owners. Anthrozoös, 11, 148–156. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gosling, S. D., John, O. P. (1999). Personality dimensions in nonhuman animals: A cross-species review. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 69–75. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Grusec, J. E. (1983). The internalization of altruistic dispositions: Cognitive analysis. In E. T. Higgins, D. N. Ruble, W. W. Hartup (Eds.), Social cognition and social development (pp. 275–293). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L. J., Yzerbyt, V., Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899–913. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.89.6.899 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Laborin, M.-C., Lecourvoisier, A. (1986). Le rôle des traits centraux dans la formation des impressions [The role of central traits in impression formation]. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 6, 95–102. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Le Barbenchon, E., Milhabet, I. (2005). L’optimisme: Réponse désirable et/ou socialement utile? [Optimism: A desirable and/or a socially useful response?] Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 18, 153–181. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R.-R., Costa, P. T. (2006). A five-factor theory perspective on traits and culture. Psychologie Française, 51, 227–244. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Osgood, C. E. (1962). Studies of the generality of affective meaning systems. American Psychologist, 17, 10–28. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Peabody, D. (1967). Trait inferences: Evaluative and descriptive aspects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7 (entire issue). doi.org/10.1037/h0025230 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Peeters, G. (1986). Good and evil as softwares of the brain: On psychological “immediates” underlying the metaphysical “ultimates”: A contribution from social psychology and semantic differential research. Ultimate Reality and Meaning: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Philosophy of Understanding, 9, 210–231. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Peeters, G. (1992). Evaluative meanings of adjectives in vitro and in context: Some theoretical implications and practical consequences of positive-negative asymmetry and behavioral-adaptive concepts of evaluation. Psychologica Belgica, 32, 211–231. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Peeters, G., Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negative effects. In W. Stroebe, M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 33–60). London, UK: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ricardo, D. (1817). The principles of political economy and taxation. London, UK: John Murray. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenberg, S., Sedlack, A. (1972). Structural representations of implicit personality theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 235–297). New York: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schiffler, F., Dubois, N., Mollaret, P. (2010, August). Modes de connaissances des objets sociaux: Leur induction et leur généralisation [Two ways in knowing social objects: Their induction and generalization]. Paper presented at the 8th Congrès International de Psychologie Sociale en Langue Française, Nice, France. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Scholer, A. A., Higgins, E. T. (2008). People as resources: Exploring the functionality of warm and cold . European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1111–1120. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.509 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shweder, R. A. (1975). How relevant is an individual difference theory of personality? Journal of Personality, 43, 455–484. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shweder, R. A., D’Andrade, R. G. (1979). Accurate reflection or systematic distortions? A reply to Block, Weiss, and Thorne. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1075–1084. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.1075 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Srull, P. K., Wyer, R. S. (1989). Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96, 58–63. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Suitner, C., Maass, A. (2008). The role of valence in the perception of agency and communion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1073–1082. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.525 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wojciszke, B. (1994). Multiple meanings of behavior: Construing actions in terms of competence and morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 222–232. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and competence in person and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155–188. doi: 10.1080/10463280500229619 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., Kervyn, N., Judd, C. (2008). Compensation versus halo: The unique relation between the fundamental dimensions of social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1110–1123. doi: 10.1177/0146167208318602 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar