Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Communication

Handwriting Fluency in Children

Impact and Correlates

Published Online:March 20, 2014https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000127

Abstract

This cross-sectional study aimed to (1) construct a model of handwriting fluency in children and (2) explore the impact of fluent handwriting and visual-motor integration on orthographic skills. In a Swiss sample of 93 fourth graders (mean age = 10 years, 7 months; SD = 6.58 months), handwriting speed and legibility were assessed by means of a copying task. Furthermore, automaticity of handwriting, stroke pressure, and stroke frequency were measured on a digitizing tablet, while visual-motor integration and orthographic skills were assessed by means of standardized tests. SEM modeling revealed that automaticity of handwriting, which is associated with both stroke frequency and stroke pressure, predicts handwriting speed as well as orthographic skills. The latter association remained significant even when visual-motor integration, which also proved to be a predictor of orthographic skills, was included in the model. The results are discussed with respect to theories that assume that the automaticity of handwriting is associated with saving cognitive resources.

References

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2007). Amos 16.0 user’s guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beery, K. E., Beery, N. A. (2006). The Beery-Buktenica developmental test of visual motor integration: Beery VMI. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Berninger, V., Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flowers’ model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In J. S. Carlson, E. C. Butterfly (Eds.), Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing. Advances in cognition and educational practice (Vol. 2, pp. 57–81). Greenwich, CT: JAI. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bourdin, B., Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach. International Journal of Psychology, 29, 591–620. doi 10.1080/00207599408248175 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bourdin, B., Fayol, M. (2000). Is graphic activity cognitively costly? A developmental approach. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13, 183–196. doi 10.1023/ A:1026458102685 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Christensen, C. A. (2005). The role of orthographic-motor integration in the production of creative and well-structured written text for students in secondary school. Educational Psychology, 22, 441–453. doi 10.1080/01443410500042076 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Connelly, V., Dockrell, J. E., Barnett, J. (2005). The slow handwriting of undergraduate students constrains overall performance in exam essays. Educational Psychology, 25, 99–107. doi 10.1080/0144341042000294912 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ehri, L. C., Rosenthal, J. (2007). Spelling of words: A neglected facilitator of vocabulary learning. Journal of Literacy Research, 39, 389–409. doi 10.1080/10862960701675341 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goyen, T. A., Duff, S. (2005). Discriminant validity of the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration in relation to children with handwriting dysfunction. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52, 109–115. doi 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2005.00488.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Grabowski, J. (2010). Speaking, writing, and memory span in children: Output modality affects cognitive performance. International Journal of Psychology, 45, 28–39. doi 10.1080/ 00207590902914051 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Graham, S. (1990). The role of production factors in learning disabled students’ compositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 781–791. doi 10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.781 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Graham, S., Berninger, V., Weintraub, N., Schafer, W. (1998). Development of handwriting speed and legibility in grades 1–9. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 42–52. doi 10.1080/00220679809597574 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Fink, B. (2000). Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 620–633. doi 10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.620 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hill, D. S., Gladden, M. A., Porter, J. T., Cooper, J. O. (1982). Variables affecting transition from wide-spaced to normal-spaced paper for manuscript handwriting. The Journal of Educational Research, 76, 50–53. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hoyle, R. H. (2011). Structural equation modeling for social and personality psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hurschler, S., Saxer, A., Wicki, W. (2008). Schreibmotorische Leistungen im frühen Primarschulalter in Abhängigkeit vom unterrichteten Schrifttyp. Forschungsbericht Nr. 18 der Pädagogischen Hochschule Zentralschweiz [Impact of handwriting style on graphomotor skills among children in early primary school. Research report No. 18 at the University of Teacher Education, Lucerne Switzerland]. Lucerne, Switzerland: PHZ Luzern. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hurschler, S., Saxer, A., Wicki, W. (2010). Schreibmotorische Leistungen im Primarschulalter in Abhängigkeit vom unterrichteten Schrifttyp. Forschungsbericht Nr. 24 der Pädagogischen Hochschule Zentralschweiz [Impact of handwriting style on graphomotor skills among children in primary school. Research report No. 24 at the University of Teacher Education, Lucerne Switzerland]. Lucerne, Switzerland: PHZ Luzern. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, D., Christensen, C. A. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and student’s ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 44–49. doi 10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.44 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kandel, S., Álvarez, C. J., Vallée, N. (2006). Syllables as processing units in handwriting production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 18–31. doi 10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.18 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kandel, S., Peereman, R., Grosjacques, G., Fayol, M. (2011). For a psycholinguistic model of handwriting production: Testing the syllable-bigram controversy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1310–1322. doi 10.1037/a0023094 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kulp, M. T. (1999). Relationship between visual motor integration skill and academic performance in kindergarten through third grade. Optometry and Vision Science, 76, 159–163. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mahrhofer, C. (2004). Schreibenlernen mit graphomotorisch vereinfachten Schreibvorgaben: Eine experimentelle Studie zum Erwerb der verbundenen Ausgangsschrift in der 1. und 2. Jahrgangsstufe [Learning to write with graphomotorically simplified writing instructions: An experimental study on the acquisition of cursive writing in the first and second grades]. Bad Heilbrunn, Germany: Klinkhardt. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mai, N., Marquardt, C. (1995). Analysis and therapy of disturbed handwriting movements. Psychologische Beiträge, 37, 538–582. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mai, N., Marquardt, C. (1999). Schreibtraining in der neurologischen Rehabilitation (2nd ed.) [Handwriting training in neurological rehabilitation]. Dortmund, Germany: Borgmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marquardt, C., Mai, N. (1994). A computational procedure for movement analysis in handwriting. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 52, 39–45. doi 10.1016/0165-0270(94)90053-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marquardt, C., Mai, N. (2007). CSWin Version 2007: Bedienungshandbuch [CSWin Version 2007: Manual]. Munich, Germany: MedCom. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marr, D., Cermak, S. (2002). Predicting handwriting performance of early elementary students with the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 661–669. doi 10.2466/pms.2002.95.2.661 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • May, P. (2002). HSP 1–9: Diagnose orthografischer Kompetenz – Handbuch [HSP 1–9: Analysis of orthographic ability – Manual]. Hamburg, Germany: Verlag für pädagogische Medien. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Medwell, J., Wray, D. (2007). Handwriting: What do we know and what do we need to know?. Literacy, 41, 10–15. doi 10.1111/j.1467-9345.2007.00453.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meulenbroek, R. G. J., Van Galen, G. P. (1986). Movement analysis of repetitive writing behavior of first, second and third grade primary school children. Advances in Psychology, 37, 71–92. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meulenbroek, R. G. J., Van Galen, G. P. (1988). The acquisition of skilled handwriting: Discontinuous trends in kinematic variables. In A. M. Colley, J. R. Beechs (Eds.), Cognition and action in skilled behavior (pp. 273–281). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meulenbroek, R. G. J., Van Galen, G. P. (1989). The production of connecting strokes in cursive writing: Developing co-articulation in 8- to 12-year-old children. In R. Plamondon, C. Y. Suen, M. L. Simner (Eds.), Computer recognition and human production of handwriting (pp. 273–286). Singapore: World Scientific. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mojet, J. W. (1991). Characteristics of the developing handwriting skill in elementary education. In J. Wann, A. M. Wing, N. Sovik (Eds.), Development of graphic skills: Research, perspectives and educational implications (pp. 53–75). London, UK: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Peters, M., McGrory, J. (1987). The writing performance of inverted and noninverted right- and left-handers. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 20–32. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sortor, J. M., Kulp, M. T. (2003). Are the results of the Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration and its subtests related to achievement test scores?. Optometry and Vision Science, 80, 758–763. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thomassen, A. J. W. M. (2003). Die grapho-motorische Analyse der handschriftlichen Sprachproduktion [The graphomotoric analysis of handwritten speech production]. In T. Herrmann, J. Grabowski (Eds.), Sprachproduktion. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, C/III/1 (pp. 177–217). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tseng, M. H., Murray, E. A. (1994). Differences in perceptual-motor measures in children with good and poor handwriting. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 14, 19–36. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tucha, O., Tucha, L., Lange, K. W. (2008). Graphonomics, automaticity and handwriting assessment. Literacy, 42, 145–155. doi 10.1111/j.1741-4369.2008.00494.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Valtin, R., Badel, I., Löffler, I., Meyer-Schepers, U., Voss, A. (2003). Orthografische Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern der vierten Klasse [The orthographic ability of fourth graders]. In W. Bos, E. Lankes, M. Prenzel, K. Schwippert, G. Walther, R. Valtin (Eds.), Erste Ergebnisse aus IGLU: Schülerleistungen am Ende der vierten Jahrgangsstufe im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 227–264). Münster, Germany: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Galen, G. P. (1991). Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory. Human Movement Science, 10, 165–191. doi 10.1016/0167-9457(91)90003-G First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Galen, G. P., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., Hylkema, H. (1986). On the simultaneous monitoring of words, letter and strokes in handwriting: Evidence for a mixed linear and parallel model. In H. S. R. Kao, G. P. V. Galen, R. Hoosain (Eds.), Graphonomics: Contemporary research in handwriting (pp. 5–20). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vlachos, F., Bonoti, F. (2006). Explaining age and sex differences in children’s handwriting: A neurobiological approach. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 113–123. doi 10.1080/17405620500371455 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Volman, M. J. M., van Schendel, B. M., Jongmans, M. J. (2006). Handwriting difficulties in primary school children: A search for underlying mechanisms. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 451–460. doi 10.5014/ajot.60.4.451 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wimmer, H. (1995). From the perspective of a more regular orthography. Issues in Education, 1, 101–104. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zesiger, P., Mounoud, P., Hauert, C.-A. (1993). Effects of lexicality and trigram frequency on handwriting production in children and adults. Acta Psychologica, 82, 353–365. doi 10.1016/0001-6918(93)90020-R First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ziviani, J. (1984). Some elaborations on handwriting speed in 7- to 14-year-olds. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 535–539. doi 10.2466/pms.1984.58.2.535 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar