Das Konfliktlösungsstil-Inventar für Paare (KSIP)
Psychometrische Eigenschaften und Validierung der autorisierten deutschsprachigen Übersetzung
Abstract
Zusammenfassung. Vorgestellt wird eine deutsche Übersetzung des „Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory” (CRSI, Kurdek, 1994). Der Fragebogen erfasst mit 32 Items vier Dimensionen von Konfliktlösungsstilen: Kämpferischer Konfliktstil, Positive Konfliktlösung, Rückzug und Nachgiebigkeit jeweils in der Selbst- und Partnerbeurteilung. Die faktorielle Struktur und die Messinvarianz für Frauen und Männer sowie die Messäquivalenz zur amerikanischen Originalversion wurden mittels konfirmatorischer Faktoranalyse geprüft. Die Ergebnisse bestätigen die postulierte vierfaktorielle Struktur des Fragenbogens und deren Messinvarianz und Messäquivalenz. Die psychometrischen Eigenschaften der Skalen sind gut. Die konvergente und diskriminante Validität wurde an den globalen Faktoren der Persönlichkeit, der Partnerschaftszufriedenheit sowie der selbst- und fremdwahrgenommenen Belastung untersucht und belegt eine theoretisch fundierte Einbettung in das nomologische Netzwerk von Konfliktlösungsstilen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass mit der deutschsprachigen Übersetzung des CRSI eine reliable, ökonomische und valide Erfassung von Konfliktlösungsstilen in der Selbst- und Partnerbeurteilung geleistet werden kann.
Abstract. The paper presents a German version of the Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory (CRSI; Kurdek, 1994). The questionnaire uses 32 items to assess four dimensions of conflict resolution styles in couples (conflict engagement, positive problem solving, withdrawal, and compliance), each by self- and partner report. The factor structure and measurement invariance across sex as well as the measurement equivalence with the original CRSI were tested using confirmatory factor analysis. Results confirmed the postulated four-factor structure and indicated that the German CRSI exhibited high convergence with the original scale and comparable internal consistency. Convergent as well as discriminant validity was tested in relation to personality, measures of relationship satisfaction, and perceived stress. Results support the reliability and validity of the German CRSI.
Literatur
(1993). Perceptions of conflict in the first year of marriage: How important are similarity and understanding? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 5–19.
(1995). The managing affect and differences scale (MADS): A self-report measure assessing conflict management in couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 319–344.
(2008). Three-year follow-up of same-sex couples who had civil unions in vermont, same-sex couples not in civil unions, and heterosexual married couples. Developmental Psychology, 44, 102–116.
(2006). On the performance of Maximum Likelihood versus Means and Variance Adjusted Weighted Least Squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 186–203.
(2001). Psychologische Risikofaktoren für Scheidung: Ein Überblick. Psychologische Rundschau, 52, 85–95.
(2007). Dyadisches Coping Inventar (DCI). Testmanual. Göttingen: Hogrefe .
(1993). Neo-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI) nach Costa und McCrae. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(1990). Coping efforts and marital satisfaction – Measuring Marital coping and its correlates. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 463–474.
(2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 964–980.
(2001). Reconsidering the role of conflict in marriage. In , Couples in conflict (pp. 59–81). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1993). Paardiagnostik mit dem Gießen-Test. Bern: Huber.
(2006). When is being known or adored by romantic partners most beneficial? Self-perceptions, relationship length, and responses to partner’s verifying and enhancing appraisals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1283–1294.
(2002). A contextual analysis of the association between demand/withdraw and marital satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 9, 95–119.
(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2 ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3 ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396.
(2000). Relationship satisfaction and conflict style in romantic relationships. Journal of Psychology, 134, 337–341.
(1988). Dysfunctional interactional patterns in couples. In , Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 31–52). Clevedon, Avon, England: Multilingual Matters.
(2005). An evaluation of the German Relationship Assessment Scale. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 64, 259–263.
(2002). Demand-withdraw communication during couple conflict: A review and analysis. In , Understanding Marriage: Developments in the Study of Couple Interaction (pp. 289–322). Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
(1999). Conflict in marriage: Implications for working with couples. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 47–77.
(2003). Marital conflict: Correlates, structure, and context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 23–27.
(1993). The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: A longitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 6–15.
(1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1999). The marriage clinic. New York: W. W. Norton.
(1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction – A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 47–52.
(1991). Berner Fragebogen zum Wohlbefinden Jugendlicher (BFW). Diagnostica, 37, 66–75.
(1992). Zur Erfassung der Ehequalität: Ein Vergleich der „Dyadic Adjustment Scale” (DAS) und des „Partnerschaftsfragebogens” (PFB). Diagnostica, 38, 312–327.
(1993). Translating achievement tests for use in cross-national studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9, 57–68.
(1993). Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction – A replication and extension. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 16–27.
(1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98.
(2002). Zur psychometrischen Optimierung einer Reaktanzskala mittels klassischer und IRT-basierter Analysemethoden. Diagnostica, 48, 163–171.
(2003). Hostile, volatile, avoiding, and validating couple-conflict types: An investigation of Gottman’s couple-conflict types. Personal Relationships, 10, 267–282.
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteriea versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
(1996). Are self-report measures of dyadic relationships influenced by impression management biases? Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 322–330.
(2006). LISREL 8.80. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
. (2000). Partnerschaft und Paartherapie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(2002). Zorn in Partnerschaften: Ein Vergleich des Ärger- und Konfliktverhaltens bei zufriedenen und unzufriedenen Paaren unter Berücksichtigung Subjektiver Theorien.
Unveröffentliche Dissertation . Universität Heidelberg.(1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability – A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34.
(2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(1994). Conflict-Resolution Styles in Gay, Lesbian, Heterosexual Nonparent, and Heterosexual Parent Couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 705–722.
(1995). Predicting Change in Marital Satisfaction from Husbands and Wives Conflict-Resolution Styles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 153–164.
(2003). Methodological issues in growth-curve analyses with married couples. Personal Relationships, 10, 235–266.
(2005). Coping with interpersonal stress: Role of Big Five Traits. Journal of Personality, 73 (5), 1141–1180.
(1995). A two-stage estimation of structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 339–358.
(1998). Testaufbau und Testanalyse (6. Aufl.). Weinheim: Beltz.
(2004). Husbands’ and wives’ marital quality: The role of adult attachment orientations, depressive symptoms, and conflict resolution behaviors. Attachment & Human Development, 6, 99–112.
(2001). Fighting for your marriage. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
(1994). The five-factor model of personality as a framework for personality-health research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 278–286.
(1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In , Handbook of personality theory and research (pp. 139–153). New York: Guilford Press.
(2007). Adolescents’ romantic attachment style, conflict goals and strategies: A mediational analysis. Bowling Green State University.
(1998). Zum Umgang mit dyadischen Daten: Neue Methoden für die Sozialpsychologie. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 29, 291–306.
(1993). Die deutsche Form der Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS): Eine kurze Skala zur Messung der Zufriedenheit in einer Partnerschaft. Diagnostica, 39, 55–62.
(2007). Richtlinien für die Übersetzung fremdsprachlicher Messinstrumente. Diagnostica, 53, 1–2.
(2002). Relationship personality, conflict resolution, and marital satisfaction in the first 5 years of marriage. Family Relations, 51, 63–71.
(1982). A psychometric evaluation of the Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 739–741.
(1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.
(2004). Understanding marriage and stress: Essential questions and challenges. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1139–1162.
(1976). Conflict and conflict management. In , Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 889–935). Chicago: Rand McNally College.
(1999). Reliability and validity of the Relationship Assessment Scale. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 27, 137–147.
(2001). Kooperation und Konfliktlösung bei Scheidungspaaren in Mediation. Eine theoretische und empirische Untersuchung von Geschlechtsunterschieden und Effekten. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.
(1995). Associations of stressful life events and marital quality. Psychological Reports, 76, 1115–1122.
(1987). Grundlagen erfolgreicher Forschung in der Psychologie: Multimodale Diagnostik, Multiplismus, multivariate Reliabilitäts- und Validitätstheorie. Diagnostica, 33, 209–226.
