Skip to main content
Originalarbeit

Psychometrische Eigenschaften der deutschsprachigen Version des Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000239

Zusammenfassung. Prozessen der Emotionsregulation wird in den letzten Jahren im Rahmen psychologischer Forschung große Bedeutung beigemessen. Während im Kontext dieser Forschung mehrere Fragebogen zur Erhebung von intrapersonellen Emotionsregulationsprozessen entwickelt und validiert wurden, gibt es nur wenige Messinstrumente zur Erfassung von Emotionsregulation in interpersonellen Kontexten. In der vorliegenden Studie wurde deshalb eine deutschsprachige Version des Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (IERQ) von Hofmann, Carpenter und Curtiss (2016) entwickelt und in 2 Stichproben mit N = 206 und N = 729 Probanden im Hinblick auf ihre psychometrischen Eigenschaften untersucht. Faktorenanalytisch konnte die dimensionale Struktur des englischsprachigen IERQ mit 4 Faktoren bestätigt werden. Cronbachs α-Werte lagen für die 4 ermittelten Skalen zwischen .81 und .91, für die Retest-Reliabilitäten ergaben sich Werte zwischen .72 und .74. Hinsichtlich der Validität zeigten sich sehr ähnliche Zusammenhänge zu Maßen der intrapersonellen Emotionsregulation, wie sie mit der Originalversion ermittelt wurden. In Bezug zu anderen Konstrukten wie z. B. Depressivität wichen die hier erhobenen Korrelationen von der englischsprachigen Version ab. Weitere Analysen zur konvergenten und diskriminanten Validität bestätigten jedoch die Güte des Instrumentes, sodass bei der deutschen Version des IERQ von einem reliablen und validen Instrument zur Erfassung Interpersoneller Emotionsregulation auszugehen ist.


Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire

Abstract. Emotion regulation processes have gained increasing importance in psychological science. While a number of questionnaires have been developed to measure intrapersonal emotion regulation, there is a scarcity of measures assessing interpersonal emotion regulation. Therefore, we developed a German version of the Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (IERQ) by Hofmann, Carpenter, and Curtiss (2016) and examined the psychometric properties based on two samples including N = 206 and N = 729 participants. The factor analytic structure confirmed the four factors of the original IERQ. Cronbach’s α values for the four subscales ranged between .81 and .91, and the test–retest reliability ranged between .72 and .74. Regarding validity, the relationship with intrapersonal emotion regulation measures showed results that were comparable to the original version. Compared with other constructs, such as depression, correlations differed from the English version. However, additional analyses provided support for the convergent and discriminant validity of the instrument. Therefore, we conclude that the German version of the IERQ is also a reliable and valid instrument to assess interpersonal emotion regulation.

Literatur

  • Abler, B. & Kessler, H. (2009). Emotion Regulation Questionnaire – Eine deutschsprachige Fassung des ERQ von Gross und John. Diagnostica, 55, 144 – 152. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.55.3.144 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Aldao, A., Gee, D. G., De Los Reyes, A. & Seager, I. (2016). Emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic factor in the development of internalizing and externalizing psychopathology: Current and future directions. Development and Psychopathology, 28, 927 – 946. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579416000638 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Backenstrass, M., Joest, K., Gehrig, N., Pfeiffer, N., Mearns, J. & Catanzaro, S. J. (2010). The German version of the generalized expectancies for negative mood regulation scale: A construct validity study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 28 – 38. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.54.1.43 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Backenstrass, M. & Pfeiffer, N., Marin (2012). Emotionale Dysregulation bei affektiven Störungen. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 60, 195 – 204. https://doi.org/10.1024/1661-4747/a000116 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Backenstrass, M., Pfeiffer, N., Schwarz, T., Mearns, J. & Catanzaro, S. J. (2008). Reliabilität und Validität der deutsprachigen Version der Generalized Expectancies for Negative Mood Regulation (NMR) Scale. Diagnostica, 54, 43 – 51. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.54.1.43 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Barnow, S., Aldinger, M., Ulrich, I. & Stopsack, M. (2013). Emotionsregulation bei Depression: Ein multimethodaler Überblick. Psychologische Rundschau, 64, 235 – 243. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000172 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Catanzaro, S. J. & Mearns, J. (1990). Measuring generalized expectancies for negative mood regulation: Initial scale development and implications. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 546 – 563. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5403&4_11 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Deighton, R. M. & Traue, H. C. (2006). Emotionale Ambivalenz, Körperbeschwerden, Depressivität und soziale Interaktion: Untersuchungen zur deutschen Version des „Ambivalence over Emotional Expressiveness Questionnaire“ (AEQ-G18). Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 14, 158 – 170. https://doi.org/10.1026/0943-8149.14.4.158 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Dixon-Gordon, K. L., Haliczer, L. A., Conkey, L. C. & Whalen, D. J. (2018). Difficulties in interpersonal emotion regulation: Initial development and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 40, 528 – 549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-018-9647-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ehring, T., Fischer, S., Schnülle, J., Bösterling, A. & Tuschen-Caffier, B. (2008). Characteristics of emotion regulation in recovered depressed versus never depressed individuals. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1574 – 1584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.013 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Endler, N.S. & Parker, J.D.A. (1990). Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Graser, J., Bohn, C., Kelava, A., Schreiber, F., Hofmann, S. G. & Stangier, U. (2012). Der „Affective Style Questionnaire (ASQ)“: Deutsche Adaption und Validitäten. Diagnostica, 58, 100 – 111. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000056 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Gratz, K. L. & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41 – 54. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gross, J. J. (2001). Emotion regulation in adulthood: Timing is everything. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 214 – 219. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00152 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39, 281 – 291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577201393198 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26 (1), 1 – 26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gross, J. J. & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348 – 362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hautzinger, M., Bailer, M., Hofmeister, D. & Keller, F. (2012). Allgemeine Depressionsskala (2., überarb. und neu norm. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, S. G. (2014). Interpersonal emotion regulation model of mood and anxiety disorders. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38, 483 – 492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9620-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, S. G. (2016). Emotion in therapy: From science to practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, S. G., Carpenter, J. K. & Curtiss, J. (2016). Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (IERQ): Scale development and psychometric characteristics. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 40, 341 – 356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-016-9756-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, S. G. & Kashdan, T. B. (2010). The Affective Style Questionnaire: Development and psychometric properties. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32, 255 – 263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-009-9142-4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Fang, A. & Asnaani, A. (2012). Emotion dysregulation model of mood and anxiety disorders. Depression and Anxiety, 29, 409 – 416. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.21888 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holodynski, M., Hermann, S. & Kromm, H. (2013). Entwicklungspsychologische Grundlagen der Emotionsregulation. Psychologische Rundschau, 64, 196 – 207. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000174 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, D. P. & Whisman, M. A. (2013). Gender differences in rumination: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 367 – 374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.019 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kälin, W. (1995). Deutsche 24-Item Kurzform des Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) von N.S. Endler und J.D.A. Parker. Basierend auf der Übersetzung von N. Semmer, F. Tschan und V. Schade (unveröffentlichter Fragebogen). Bern: Institut für Psychologie, Universität Bern. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • King, L. A. & Emmons, R. A. (1990). Conflict over expressing emotion: Physical and psychological correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 864 – 877. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.864 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, K.-W. & Tausch, A. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der „Positive and Negative Affect Schedule“ (PANAS). Diagnostica, 42, 139 – 156. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leiner, D. J. (2013). Too Straight, Too Weird: Post Hoc Identification of Meaningless Data in Internet Surveys. Working Paper. Verfügbar unter https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258997762 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Levy-Gigi, E. & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2017). Help me if you can: Evaluating the effectiveness of interpersonal compared to intrapersonal emotion regulation in reducing distress. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 55, 33 – 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.11.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Niven, K. (2017). The four key characteristics of interpersonal emotion regulation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 17, 89 – 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.015 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Niven, K., Totterdell, P., Stride, C. B. & Holman, D. (2011). Emotion Regulation of Others and Self (EROS): The development and validation of a new individual difference measure. Current Psychology, 30, 53 – 73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-011-9099-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S. & Aldao, A. (2011). Gender and age differences in emotion regulation strategies and their relationship to depressive symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 704 – 708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.012 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SoSciSurveyGmbH (2015). Fragebogen online erstellen. Befragung im Internet durchführen. Verfügbar unter https://www.soscisurvey.de. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van de Vijver, F. & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89 – 99. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Rindermann, H. (2009). Emotionale-Kompetenz-Fragebogen (EKF). Ein Verfahren zur Einschätzung emotionaler Kompetenzen und emotionaler Intelligenz aus Selbst- und Fremdsicht. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A. & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1 063 – 1 070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, W. C., Morelli, S. A., Ong, D. C. & Zaki, J. (2018). Interpersonal emotion regulation: Implications for affiliation, perceived support, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115, 224 – 254. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000132.supp First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zaki, J. & Williams, W. C. (2013). Interpersonal emotion regulation. Emotion, 13, 803 – 810. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033839 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar