Skip to main content
Originalarbeit

Eine Normierung unterschiedlicher Aspekte der emotionalen Bewertung von Persönlichkeitsattributen

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000290

Zusammenfassung. Die emotionale Bewertung von Eigenschaftsbegriffen und Persönlichkeitsattributen ist in vielen Forschungsbereichen und für viele Forschungszwecke von Bedeutung. Diese Untersuchung liefert eine neue Datenbank für emotionale Bewertungen von 140 Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen. Die Bewertungen von N = 701 Teilnehmenden wurden erhoben. In Erweiterung der bisher veröffentlichten Listen unterscheidet die vorliegende Datenbank neben der positiven und negativen Valenz und Erregung, die von den Merkmalen vermittelt wird, zwischen 5 Emotionen (Freude, Ärger, Ekel, Traurigkeit und Angst) sowie subjektiven Annäherungs- und Vermeidungstendenzen. Die Ergebnisse der Normierung sind unter https://osf.io/gbcq2 abrufbar.


Norms for Various Aspects of the Emotional Evaluation of Personality Traits

Abstract. The emotional evaluation of traits and personality attributes is important in many research areas and for many research purposes. This research provides a new database for emotional ratings of 140 personality traits. This data were obtained from N = 701 participants. By extending previously published lists, the present database differentiates, in addition to positive and negative valence and arousal conveyed by the traits, between five emotions (happiness, anger, disgust, sadness, and fear) as well as subjective approach- and avoidance tendencies. The complete wordlist including the scores on all dimensions may be retrieved from https://osf.io/gbcq2

Literatur

  • Alexopoulos, T. & Ric, F. (2007). The evaluation-behavior link: Direct and beyond valence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 1010 – 1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.017 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alloy, L. B. & Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 441 – 485. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.108.4.441 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y. & Viscusi, D. (1981). Induced mood and the illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1129 – 1140. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.6.1129 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, N. H. (1968). Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 272 – 279. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025907 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Angie, A. D., Connelly, S., Waples, E. P. & Kligyte, V. (2011). The influence of discrete emotions on judgement and decision-making: A meta-analytic review. Cognition & Emotion, 25, 1393 – 1422. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.550751 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bargh, J. A. & Pietromonaco, P. (1982). Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 437 – 449. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.437 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bradley, M. M. & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Gainesville, FL: Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Briesemeister, B. B., Kuchinke, L. & Jacobs, A. M. (2011a). Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times. PloS one, 6 (8), e23743. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023743 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Briesemeister, B. B., Kuchinke, L. & Jacobs, A. M. (2011b). Discrete emotion norms for nouns: Berlin affective word list (DENN-BAWL). Behavior research methods, 43, 441 – 448. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0059-y First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L. & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1 (1), 3 – 25. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carver, C. S. & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 183 – 204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013965 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V. & Niknafs, A. (2014). NbClust: An R package for determining the relevant number of clusters in a data set. Journal of Statistical Software, 61 (6), 1 – 36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v061.i06 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, M. & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215 – 224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025002007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Delgado, M. R., Frank, R. H. & Phelps, E. A. (2005). Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1611 – 1618. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1575 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eder, A. B. & Rothermund, K. (2008). When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 262 – 281. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.262 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eilola, T. M. & Havelka, J. (2010). Affective norms for 210 British English and Finnish nouns. Behavior Research Methods, 42 (1), 134 – 140. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.134 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6(3 – 4), 169 – 200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ekman, P., Sorenson, E. R. & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotion. Science, 164 (3875), 86 – 88. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.164.3875.86 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Estes, Z. & Adelman, J. S. (2008). Automatic vigilance for negative words is categorical and general. Emotion, 8, 453 – 457. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012887 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ferré, P., Guasch, M., Martínez-García, N., Fraga, I. & Hinojosa, J. A. (2017). Moved by words: Affective ratings for a set of 2,266 Spanish words in five discrete emotion categories. Behavior research methods, 49, 1082 – 1094. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0768-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T. (1993). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 155 – 194. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.001103 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in cognitive sciences, 11 (2), 77 – 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gable, S. L. & Gosnell, C. L. (2013). Approach and avoidance behavior in interpersonal relationships. Emotion Review, 5, 269 – 274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913477513 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grandy, T. H., Lindenberger, U. & Schmiedek, F. (2020). Vampires and nurses are rated differently by younger and older adults – Age-comparative norms of imageability and emotionality for about 2500 German nouns. Behavior Research Methods, 52, 980 – 989. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01294-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hager, W. & Hasselhorn, M. (1994). Handbuch deutschsprachiger Wortnormen. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hager, W., Mecklenbräuker, S., Möller, H. & Westermann, R. (1985). Emotionsgehalt, Bildhaftigkeit, Konkretheit und Bedeutungshaltigkeit von 580 Adjektiven: Ein Beitrag zur Normierung und zur Prüfung einiger Zusammenhangshypothesen. Archiv für Psychologie, 137, 75 – 97. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hinojosa, J.A., Martínez-García, N., Villalba-García, C., Fernández-Folgueiras, U., Sánchez-Carmona, A., Pozo, M. A. et al. (2016). Affective norms of 875 Spanish words for five discrete emotional categories and two emotional dimensions. Behavior Research Methods, 48,, 272 – 284. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0572-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, E. E. & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: the attribution process in social psychology. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219 – 266). , New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60107-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kanske, P. & Kotz, S. A. (2010). Leipzig Affective Norms for German: A reliability study. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 987 – 991. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.987 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kapucu, A., Kılıç, A., Özkılıç, Y. & Sarıbaz, B. (2018). Turkish emotional word norms for arousal, valence, and discrete emotion categories. Psychological reports, 124, 188 – 209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118814722 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Keltner, D. & Gross, J. J. (1999). Functional accounts of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 467 – 480. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999399379140 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Keuleers, E. & Brysbaert, M. (2011). Detecting inherent bias in lexical decision experiments with the LD1NN algorithm. The Mental Lexicon, 6 (1), 34 – 52. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.6.1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klauer, K. C. & Musch, J. (1999). Eine Normierung unterschiedlicher Aspekte der evaluativen Bewertung von 92 Substantiven [A standardization of various aspects of the evaluation of 92 nouns]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 30 (1), 1 – 11. https://doi.org/10.1024/0044-3514.30.1.1 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Kousta, S. T., Vinson, D. P. & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112 (3), 473 – 481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kuperman, V., Estes, Z., Brysbaert, M. & Warriner, A. B. (2014). Emotion and language: Valence and arousal affect word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1065 – 1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035669 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lahl, O., Göritz, A. S., Pietrowsky, R. & Rosenberg, J. (2009). Using the World-Wide Web to obtain large-scale word norms: 190,212 ratings on a set of 2,654 German nouns. Behavior Research Methods, 41 (1), 13 – 19. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.1.13 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lerner, J. S., Gonzalez, R. M., Small, D. A. & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14 (2), 144 – 150. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01433 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lerner, J. S. & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 473 – 493. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402763 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levenson, R. W. (1999). The intrapersonal functions of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 481 – 504. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999399379159 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Redondo, J., Fraga, I., Padrón, I. & Comesaña, M. (2007). The Spanish adaptation of ANEW (Affective Norms for English Words). Behavior Research Methods, 39, 600 – 605. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193031 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ric, F., Alexopoulos, T., Muller, D. & Aubé, B. (2013). Emotional norms for 524 French personality trait words. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 414 – 421. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0276-z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C. & Vivekananthan, P. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283 – 294. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026086 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161 – 1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Russell, J. A. & Barrett, L. F. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 805 – 819. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.805 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scherer, K. R. (2003). Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms. Speech Communication, 40, 227 – 256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00084-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scherer, K.R. & Ekman, P. (1984). Approaches to emotion. New York, NY: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315798806 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Scherer, K. R. & Wallbott, H. G. (1994). Evidence for universality and cultural variation of differential emotion response patterning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 310 – 328. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.310 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidtke, D. S., Schröder, T., Jacobs, A. M. & Conrad, M. (2014). ANGST: Affective norms for German sentiment terms, derived from the affective norms for English words. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 1108 – 1118. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0426-y First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schönbach, P. (1972). Likableness ratings of 100 German personality-trait words corresponding to a subset of Anderson’s 555 trait words. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 327 – 333. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420020309 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwibbe, M., Räder, K., Schwibbe, G., Borchardt, M. & Geiken-Pophanken, G. (1981). Zum emotionalen Gehalt von Substantiven, Adjektiven und Verben. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 28, 486 – 501. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shrout, P. E. & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420 – 428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science (New York, N.Y.), 236(4 799), 280 – 285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E. & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1333 – 1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, E. R. & Semin, G. R. (2004). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 53 – 117). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36002-8 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stevenson, R., Mikels, J. & James, T. (2007). Characterization of the affective norms for English words by discrete emotional categories. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 1020 – 1024. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192999 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tamir, M. & Diener, E. (2008). Approach-avoidance goals and well-being: One size does not fit all. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 415 – 430). New York, NY: Psychology Press / Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203888148 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van der Eijk, C. (2001). Measuring agreement in ordered rating scales. Quality & Quantity, 35, 325 – 341. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010374114305 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Võ, M. L., Conrad, M., Kuchinke, L., Urton, K., Hofmann, M. J. & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). The Berlin Affective Word List Reloaded (BAWL-R). Behavior Research Methods, 41, 534 – 538. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.534 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Võ, M. L., Jacobs, A. M. & Conrad, M. (2006). Cross-validating the Berlin Affective Word List. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 606 – 609. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193892 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wentura, D., Rothermund, K. & Bak, P. (2000). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1024 – 1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1024 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilkowski, B. M. & Meier, B. P. (2010). Bring it on: Angry facial expressions potentiate approach-motivated motor behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 201 – 210. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017992 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar