Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637.36.1.19

Zusammenfassung. Die Charakterisierung von Opfern und Tätern, die Beschreibung ihrer Beziehungen und die Erfassung möglicher Konsequenzen von systematischer, wiederholter Aggression gegen Schwächere reichen nicht aus, um die Dynamik von Bullying als Problem von Schulklassen darzustellen. Auf Basis des von Salmivalli entwickelten “Participant role“ Ansatzes (Salmivalli, Lagerspetz, Björkqvist, Österman & Kaukiainen, 1996) untersuchten wir 104 Schülern aus vier sechsten Klassen an zwei Hauptschulen und können neun von zehn Schülern eine distinkte Rolle im Bullyingprozess zuordnen. Anhand der sozialen Positionen im Klassengefüge (soziale Präferenz/sozialer Einfluss) und anhand reziproker Beziehungen (Freundschaften) lassen sich Opfer, Verteidiger des Opfers, außenstehende, Täter, Assistent oder Verstärker des Täters unterscheiden. Freundschaften verbinden im Wesentlichen Schüler ohne aggressive Verhaltenstendenzen einerseits und die, die aktiv daran beteiligt sind, dass jemand schikaniert wird andererseits. Implikationen für einen kontextzentrierten Blick auf den Bullyingprozess werden diskutiert.


Bullying as group phenomenon: An adaptation of the “participant role” approach

Abstract. Research on characteristics of victims and bullies, descriptions of their relationships, and on the consequences of systematic, repeated aggression within an asymmetric power relationship prove insufficient to uncover bullying dynamics due to peer involvement. Based on Salmivallis “participant role approach” (Salmivalli, Lagerspetz, Björkqvist, Österman, & Kaukiainen, 1996) we investigated 104 6th graders from four classes of two different schools and identified participant roles for nine out of ten pupils. Social position (social preference/social impact) and reciprocal relationships (friendship) differentiated victims, defenders, outsiders, bullies, their assistants, and their reinforcers. Friendship links those with a non-aggressive behavioural style on one side and those who are actively involved in bullying on the other side. Implications for a group-centered view on the bullying process are discussed.

Literatur

  • Boivin, M. , Dodge, K. A. , Coie, J. D. (1995). Individual group behavioral similarity and peer status in experimental play groups of boys: The social misfit revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 2 269– 279 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boulton, M. J. , Hawker, D. S. (1997). Non-physical forms of bullying among school pupils: A cause for concern. Health Education, 97, 61– 64 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boulton, M. J. , Smith, P. K. (1994). Bully/victim problems in middle-school children: Stability, self-perceived competence, peer perceptions and peer acceptance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 315– 329 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boulton, M. J. , Underwood, K. (1992). Bully/victim problems among middle school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 73– 87 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coie, J. D. (1990). Towards a theory of peer rejection. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 356-401). New York: Cambridge University Press . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Coie, J. D. , Dodge, K. A. (1988). Multiple sources of data on social behavior and social status in the school: Across-age comparisons. Child Development, 59, 815– 829 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coie, J. D. , Dodge, K. A. , Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557– 570 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Craig, W. M. , Pepler, D. J. (1995). Peer processes in bullying and victimization: An observational study. Exceptionality Education Canada, 5, 81– 91 . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Crick, N. R. , Werner, N. E. , Casas, J. F. , O’Brien, K. M. , Nelson, D. A. , Grotpeter, J. K. , Markon, K. (1999). Childhood aggression and gender: A new look at an old problem. In D. Berstein (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 45, pp. 75-141). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • DeRosier, M. E. , Cillessen, A. H. N. , Coie, J. D. , Dodge, K. A. (1994). Group social context and children’s aggressive behavior. Child Development, 65, 4 1068– 1079 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frey, D. , Schäfer, M. , Neumann, R. (1999). Zivilcourage und aktives Handeln bei Gewalt: Wann werden Menschen aktiv?. In M. Schäfer & D. Frey (Hrsg.), Aggression und Gewalt unter Kindern und Jugendlichen (S. 265-284). Hogrefe: Göttingen . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hodges, E. V. E. , Boivin, M. , Vitaro, F. , Bukowski, W. M. (1999). The power of friendship: Protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1 94– 101 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lagerspetz, K. M. , Björkqvist, K. , Berts, M. , King, E. (1982). Group aggression among school children in three schools. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23, 45– 52 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lowenstein, L. F. (1995). Perception and accuracy of perception by bullying children of potential victims. Education Today, 45, 28– 31 . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Menesini, E. , Eslea, M. , Smith, P. K. , Genta, M. L. , Giannetti, E. , Fonzi, A. , Costabile, A. (1997). Cross-national comparison of children’s attitudes towards bully/victim problems in school. Aggressive Behavior, 23, 245– 257 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Östermann, K. , Björkqvist, K. , Lagerspetz, K. M. J. , Kaukiainen, A. , Huesmann, L. R. , Fraczek, A. (1994). Peer and self-estimated aggression and victimization in 8-year-old children from five ethnic groups. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 411– 428 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Olweus, D. (1991). Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. In D. J. Pepler & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411-448). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Olweus, D. (1999). Sweden. In P. K Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano & P. Slee (Eds.), The Nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective (pp. 7-27). London: Routledge . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pellegrini, A. D. , Bartini, M. , Brooks, F. (1999). School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: Factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 216– 224 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perry, D. G. , Willard, J. C. , Perry, L. C. (1990). Peers’ perceptions of the consequences that victimized children provide aggressors. Child Development, 61, 1310– 1325 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Salmivalli, C. , Lagerspetz, K. M. J. , Björkqvist, K. , Österman, K. , Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1– 15 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Salmivalli, C. , Lappalainen, M. , Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1998). Stability and change of behavior in connection with bullying in schools: A two-year follow-up. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 205– 218 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schäfer, M. , Korn, S. (2001). Bullying - eine Definition (PEU-Stichwort). Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 48, 3 236– 237 . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schäfer, M. , Korn, S. , Wolke, D. F. , Schulz, H. (2002). Bullying roles in changing contexts: The stability of victim and bully roles from primary to secondary school . Manuscript submitted for publication . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schäfer, M. , Werner, N. (1999). Offene Aggression und Beziehungsaggression als geschlechtstypische Formen von Aggression unter Schülern (Bullying) . (Forschungsbericht Nr. 122). Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München: Department Psychologie, Institut für Pädagogische Psychologie . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schäfer, M. , Werner, N. E. , Crick, N. R. (2002). A comparison of two approaches to the study of negative peer treatment: General victimization and bully/victim problems among German school children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 281– 306 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, P. K. , Cowie, H. , Olafsson, R. , Liefooghe, A. D. (2002). Definitions of Bullying: a Comparison of Terms Used, and Age and Gender Differences, in a Fourteen-Country International Comparison. Child Development, 73, 4 1119– 1133 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sutton, J. , Smith, P. K. (1999). Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participant role approach. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 97– 111 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sutton, J. , Smith, P. K. , Swettenham, J. (1999). Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation?. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 435– 450 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • TMR (2000). Nature and prevention of bullying . Verfügbar unter: http://www.gold.ac.uk/tmr/reports/aim2_seville1. html#SEV2 [Feb. 2000] . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wright, J. C. , Giammarino, M. , Parad, H. W. (1986). Social status in small groups: Individual group similarity and the social “misfit”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 3 523– 536 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar